Grantee Research Project Results
Final Report: Toxicological Evaluation of Realistic Emission Source Aerosol (TERESA): Investigation of Vehicular Emissions
EPA Grant Number: R832416C005Subproject: this is subproject number 005 , established and managed by the Center Director under grant R832416
(EPA does not fund or establish subprojects; EPA awards and manages the overall grant for this center).
Center: Health Effects Institute (2015 - 2020)
Center Director: Greenbaum, Daniel S.
Title: Toxicological Evaluation of Realistic Emission Source Aerosol (TERESA): Investigation of Vehicular Emissions
Investigators: Koutrakis, Petros , Godleski, John J.
Institution: Harvard University
EPA Project Officer: Chung, Serena
Project Period: October 1, 2005 through September 30, 2010 (Extended to September 30, 2011)
RFA: Particulate Matter Research Centers (2004) RFA Text | Recipients Lists
Research Category: Human Health , Air
Objective:
Summary/Accomplishments (Outputs/Outcomes):
|
Species or Diagnostic Ratio
|
EXPOSURE ATMOSPHERE TYPE
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Aged Primary + Secondary (P+SOA)
|
Secondary Aerosol Only (SOA)
|
Primary (P)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Baseline
|
Plus O3
|
Lights
|
Baseline
|
Plus O3
|
Lights
|
no O3 or light
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
PM
|
6.50
|
5.10
|
22.60
|
0.40
|
1.69
|
50.27
|
47.00
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EC
|
1.68
|
1.00
|
1.20
|
0.00*
|
0.00*
|
0.00*
|
12.26
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
OC
|
1.57
|
3.62
|
8.82
|
2.91
|
3.90
|
22.85
|
10.87
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
OC1
|
0.04
|
0.05
|
0.06
|
0.02
|
0.12
|
0.25
|
0.23
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
OC2
|
0.79
|
1.73
|
2.59
|
1.45
|
1.79
|
6.88
|
5.30
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
OC3
|
0.62
|
1.30
|
3.35
|
0.85
|
1.16
|
8.54
|
4.29
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
OC4
|
0.16
|
0.37
|
1.16
|
0.23
|
0.32
|
2.49
|
1.23
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Pyrol C
|
0.00
|
0.16
|
1.66
|
0.36
|
0.51
|
4.69
|
0.19
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NO3-
|
0.33
|
1.18
|
2.73
|
0.10
|
1.08
|
3.84
|
0.52
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
SO42-
|
0.50
|
0.41
|
4.00
|
0.11
|
0.16
|
7.15
|
2.59
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EC/PM
|
0.26
|
0.20
|
0.05
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.26
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
OC/EC
|
0.93
|
3.62
|
7.35
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
0.89
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
OC1/OC
|
0.03
|
Conclusions (to date). We developed and utilized an exposure system that forms stable and reproducible amounts of SOA from photochemically oxidized primary gas-phase precursors in traffic emissions found in an urban highway tunnel in the northeastern United States, at concentrations that are adequate for inhalation toxicity studies. Our methods allowed us to generate and characterize reproducible exposure atmospheres of: a) primary particles; b) aged primary particles plus secondary particles, and; c) secondary particles only.
In this study, it is clear that the formation of secondary aerosol is influenced significantly by reaction with ∙OH, because secondary aerosol formation for PM, OC, SO42- and NO3- are substantially increased by irradiation and not by the presence of only O3 and ∙NO3. Overall, the P+SOA particles are comparable in terms of the relative composition of major species to those reported in studies of ambient particle matter, especially for northeastern U.S. sites.
All of the exposures produced respiratory changes compared to filtered air, but more prominent respiratory toxicity was found in animals exposed to P+SOA. Overall, P+SOA>P>SOA for respiratory outcomes. The effect was greater in animals with repeated exposures. Significant breathing pattern changes were associated with the different exposure types. These changes were internally consistent, with patterns that indicate an irritative response to exposure. This response is mediated by local (respiratory effort) and central (respiratory drive) components and is augmented with repeated exposure to fresh and aged vehicular emissions. Four day exposures to P+SOA produced the most significant and complex response in breathing pattern, with decreases in volumes, flows, respiratory drive and respiratory effort. This suggests that photochemical oxidation and formation of secondary particle mass enhanced the toxicity of primary traffic derived particles.
The observed inflammatory responses were mild, but more evident in the aged primary plus SOA exposure. The time of the biological measurement (acute response) indicates that this is most likely an initial phase of response to the exposure.
Both primary and secondary traffic-related aerosols can substantially increase SBP and DBP. Initial increases up to 15 mmHg in diastolic blood pressure were recorded for the P exposure. This is a greater blood pressure change than has previously been reported in the literature in animal or human studies for either similar or substantially higher PM2.5 concentrations. The responses are sustained with repeated primary aerosol exposures, but not with secondary aerosols. Animals exposed to secondary aerosols showed a gradual decrease in the magnitude of response with repeated exposures, and subsequently show compensatory decreases in both SBP and DBP after the 3 week protocol. This unexpected but significant compensatory response suggests a biological protective effect with repeated exposures that cannot be explained by simple autonomic nervous system activation. These results confirm the adverse health effects associated with inhalation of fine particles in previous studies and give insight into a potential biological adaptation to maintain blood pressure in response to repeated and anticipated pollutant exposure. Greater limitation in the BP response in animals exposed to secondary particles requires further investigation to define the interaction of this exposure with blood pressure control mechanisms. No exposure had a significant effect on heart rate.
Conclusions from the TERESA Power Plant study. This work shows that statistically significant, but relatively mild, health effects were produced by inhalation exposure experiments using coal-fired power plant emissions that were photochemically aged in a manner that simulated atmospheric oxidation in a power plant plume. Health effect outcomes included mild but significant changes in: breathing pattern; pulmonary inflammation (e.g., BAL total cell count and macrophages); and oxidative stress in the lung and heart (in vivo chemiluminescence). The observed health effects tended to result from scenarios that had more reactants added and more complex chemical reactions (POS, PONS). Sulfate, which is not associated with serious toxicological effect at moderate exposure levels, was (as expected) a large component of the exposure atmospheres.
One of the difficulties with this study was that the primary particle concentrations were exceedingly low. This meant that the P exposures were conducted at much lower levels than the PO, POS and PONS exposures, which were within the same range and comparable to studies using CAPs. This made it very difficult to assess the comparative toxicity of the primary particles. For this reason, the mobile source TERESA study conducted exposures to the three types of aerosol (P, P+SOA, and SOA) at consistent concentrations.
This project defined both the absolute and relative toxicity of secondary particles formed from coal-fired power plants compared to laboratory studies of ambient particles or CAPs. In general, secondary particles formed from power plant emissions were less toxic than inhaled CAPs, though the most complex scenarios approached (but did not equal) the reported toxicity of inhaled CAPs. The project also modeled and provided insight into the formation of secondary particles formed from the gaseous emissions of the power plants, clearly demonstrating that these transformations could be produced in a field laboratory.
References:
Allen JO, Mayo PR, Hughes LS, Salmon LG, Cass GR. Emissions of size segregated aerosols from on-road vehicles in the Caldecott tunnel. Environ Sci Technol 2001;35:4189-4197.
Bartoli CR, Wellenius GA, Diaz EA, Lawrence J, Coull BA, Akiyama I, Lee LM, Okabe K, Verrier RL, Godleski JJ. Mechanisms of inhaled fine particulate air pollution-induced arterial blood pressure changes. Environ Health Perspect 2009;117:361-366.
Cohn JN, Mcinnes GT, Shepherd AM. Direct-acting vasodilators. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2011;13:690-692.
Cotes JE, Chinn DJ, Miller M. Lung function in relation to general anesthesia and artificial ventilation. In: Khan M (ed.). Lung Function: Physiology, Measurement and Application in Medicine. Sixth edition. Blackwell Publishing, 2006.
Fraser MP, Cass GR, Simoneit BRT. Particulate organic compounds emitted from motor vehicle exhaust and in the urban atmosphere. Atmos Environ 1999;33:2715-2724.
Gianetti J, Bevilacqua S, De Caterina R. Inhaled nitric oxide: more than a selective pulmonary vasodilator. Eur J Clin Invest 2002;32:628-635.
Hagler GSW, Baldauf RW, Thoma ED, Long TR, Snow RF, Kinsey JS, Oudejans L, Gullet B. Ultrafine particles near a major roadway in Raleigh, North Carolina: Downwind attenuation and correlation with traffic-related pollutants. Atmos Environ 2009;43:1229-1234.
Hatakeyama S, Kobayashi H, Akimoto H. Gas-phase oxidation of SO2 in the ozone-olefin reactions. J Phys Chem 1984;88:4736-4739.
Kirchstetter TW, Harley RA, Kreisberg NM, Stolzenburg MR, Hering SV. On-road measurement of fine particulate and nitrogen oxide emissions from light- and heavy-duty motor vehicles. Atmos Environ 1999;33:2955-2968.
Otterbein LE, Mantell LL, Choi AM. Carbon monoxide provides protection against hyperoxic lung injury. Am J Physiol 1999;276:L688-L694.
Ruiz PA, Lawrence JE, Ferguson S, Wolfson JM, Koutrakis P. A counter-current parallel-plate membrane denuder for the non-specific removal of trace gases. Environ Sci Technol 2006, 40:5058-5063.
Ryter SW, Morse D, Choi AM. Carbon monoxide: to boldly go where NO has gone before. Sci STKE 2004;230:RE6.
Smith PE, Edwards RH, Calverley PM. Ventilation and breathing pattern during sleep in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Chest 1989;96:1346-1351.
Urch B, Silverman F, Corey P, Brook JR, Lukic KZ, Rajagopalan S, Brook RD. Acute blood pressure responses in healthy adults during controlled air pollution exposures. Environ Health Perspect 2005;113:1052-1055.
Journal Articles on this Report : 4 Displayed | Download in RIS Format
Supplemental Keywords:RFA, Health, Air, Scientific Discipline, Health Risk Assessment, Risk Assessments, particulate matter, Environmental Chemistry, Toxicology, biological mechanisms, chemical characteristics, autonomic dysfunction, biological mechanism , airborne particulate matter, cardiovascular vulnerability, chemical composition, animal model, oxidative stress, ambient particle health effects, PM, atmospheric particulate matter, automobile exhaust, ambient air quality, concentrated ambient particulates (CAPs), human health effects, traffic related particulate matterProgress and Final Reports:Original AbstractMain Center Abstract and Reports:R832416 Health Effects Institute (2015 - 2020) Subprojects under this Center: (EPA does not fund or establish subprojects; EPA awards and manages the overall grant for this center). The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency. Project Research Results
9 publications for this subproject
9 journal articles for this subproject Main Center: R832416 206 publications for this center 199 journal articles for this center Site NavigationRelated InformationContact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
Last updated April 28, 2023
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||