Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you have safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Contact Us

Grantee Research Project Results

2005 Progress Report: Study of Phthalates in Pregnant Woman and Children

EPA Grant Number: R829436
Title: Study of Phthalates in Pregnant Woman and Children
Investigators: Swan, Shanna Helen , Lasley, Bill L. , Sparks, Amy , Calafat, Antonia , Redmon, Bruce , Wang, Christina , Kruse, Robin
Institution: University of Missouri - Columbia , University of Iowa , Harbor-UCLA Medical Center , University of Minnesota , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , University of California - Davis , University of Rochester
Current Institution: University of Rochester , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Harbor-UCLA Medical Center , University of California - Davis , University of Iowa , University of Minnesota , University of Missouri - Columbia
EPA Project Officer: Aja, Hayley
Project Period: August 1, 2001 through January 31, 2005 (Extended to July 31, 2007)
Project Period Covered by this Report: August 1, 2004 through January 31, 2005
Project Amount: $2,779,164
RFA: Endocrine Disruptors: Epidemiologic Approaches (2001) RFA Text |  Recipients Lists
Research Category: Environmental Justice , Human Health , Safer Chemicals , Endocrine Disruptors

Objective:

The objective of this research project is to assess the risks posed by environmental phthalate levels to reproductive health. In particular we are asking: (1) Does in utero phthalate exposure alter breast and genital development? (2) How do infants’ pre- and post-natal sensitivity to phthalates compare? (3) What are major sources of phthalate exposure for pregnant women and infants? (4) Do phthalate metabolite levels vary with ethnicity and geography? (5) Do genital and breast measurements vary with ethnicity and geography? (6) How is phthalate metabolism altered by pregnancy?

Progress Summary:

By March 1, 2006, we had:

  • Completed recruitment: Total sample size was 460 mothers and their babies (453 singletons and 7 pairs of twins).
  • Completed infants’ physical examinations: Total number was 639 baby examinations (455 first exams, 184 second).
  • Completed urine collection: Final number of samples was: 438 baby urine samples (at first exam) and 447 postnatal maternal urine samples.
  • Obtained phthalate metabolites in maternal prenatal urine, postnatal urine, and infant urine on 214 mothers and babies, as well as in an additional 110 prenatal samples.
  • Conducted product use analysis for the first 214 mothers.
  • Conducted analyses of anogenital distance (AGD) in males among the first 214 mother-child pairs.
  • Met with staff pediatricians to evaluate and revise pediatric exam for future study.

Future Activities:

During Year 5 of the project, we expect to:

  • Obtain AGD norms and the relationship of AGD to penile size and testicular descent in a data set that includes all 455 babies with at least one physical examination.
  • Obtain phthalate analyses on the remaining 475 mothers and baby urine samples.
  • Conduct analyses of AGD and prenatal phthalate exposure on complete data set.
  • Conduct analysis of baby exams and prenatal and baby levels in all mothers and children.
  • Complete analysis of phthalates and birth outcomes (with Adibi, Whyatt, and Hauser).
  • Complete analysis of product use and infant hormones (with S. Sathyanarayana).


Journal Articles on this Report : 2 Displayed | Download in RIS Format

Publications Views
Other project views: All 41 publications 12 publications in selected types All 11 journal articles
Publications
Type Citation Project Document Sources
Journal Article Marsee K, Woodruff TJ, Axelrad DA, Calafat AM, Swan SH. Estimated daily phthalate exposures in a population mothers of male infants exhibiting reduced anogenital distance. Environmental Health Perspectives 2006;114(6):805-809. R829436 (2005)
R829436 (Final)
  • Abstract from PubMed
  • Full-text: EHP
    Exit
  • Other: EHP PDF
    Exit
  • Journal Article Swan SH, Main KM, Liu F, Stewart SL, Kruse RL, Calafat AM, Mao CS, Redmon JB, Ternand CL, Sullivan S, Teague JL. Decrease in anogenital distance among male infants with prenatal phthalate exposure. Environmental Health Perspectives 2005;113(8):1056-1061. R829436 (2005)
    R829436 (Final)
  • Full-text from PubMed
  • Abstract from PubMed
  • Associated PubMed link
  • Supplemental Keywords:

    phthalates, prenatal exposure, sexual development, geography, ethnicity, endocrine, endocrine disruptors, epidemiology, ethnicity, infants, neonates, health, biochemistry, chemistry, environmental exposure and risk, human health, health risk assessment, risk assessments, susceptibility, sensitive population, genetic susceptibility, childhood development, children, developmental biology, developmental effects, endocrine disrupting chemicals, epidemiologic studies, exposure, exposure studies, human growth and development, infants, metabolites, pregnancy, pregnant women, reproductive health,, RFA, Scientific Discipline, Health, Health Risk Assessment, Chemistry, Epidemiology, Endocrine Disruptors - Environmental Exposure & Risk, endocrine disruptors, Risk Assessments, Susceptibility/Sensitive Population/Genetic Susceptibility, Biochemistry, genetic susceptability, Endocrine Disruptors - Human Health, childhood development, metabolites, infants, prenatal exposure, endocrine disrupting chemicals, exposure studies, sexual development, developmental effects, exposure, developmental biology, children, human growth and development, pregnant women, pregnancy, reproductive health, phthalates, epidemiologic studies

    Relevant Websites:

    http://www.urmc.rochester.edu/obgyn/sff Exit

    Progress and Final Reports:

    Original Abstract
  • 2002 Progress Report
  • 2003 Progress Report
  • 2004
  • 2006 Progress Report
  • Final Report
  • Top of Page

    The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

    Project Research Results

    • Final Report
    • 2006 Progress Report
    • 2004
    • 2003 Progress Report
    • 2002 Progress Report
    • Original Abstract
    41 publications for this project
    11 journal articles for this project

    Site Navigation

    • Grantee Research Project Results Home
    • Grantee Research Project Results Basic Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Advanced Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Fielded Search
    • Publication search
    • EPA Regional Search

    Related Information

    • Search Help
    • About our data collection
    • Research Grants
    • P3: Student Design Competition
    • Research Fellowships
    • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)
    Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
    Last updated April 28, 2023
    United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Discover.

    • Accessibility
    • Budget & Performance
    • Contracting
    • EPA www Web Snapshot
    • Grants
    • No FEAR Act Data
    • Plain Writing
    • Privacy
    • Privacy and Security Notice

    Connect.

    • Data.gov
    • Inspector General
    • Jobs
    • Newsroom
    • Open Government
    • Regulations.gov
    • Subscribe
    • USA.gov
    • White House

    Ask.

    • Contact EPA
    • EPA Disclaimers
    • Hotlines
    • FOIA Requests
    • Frequent Questions

    Follow.