Main Title |
Selecting priority nonpoint source projects : you better shop around / |
Author |
Adler, K. J., ;
Smolen, M. D.
|
Other Authors |
|
CORP Author |
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of the Assistant Administrator for Water. ;North Carolina State Univ. at Raleigh. |
Publisher |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, |
Year Published |
1989 |
Report Number |
EPA 506/2-89/003 |
Stock Number |
PB92-233063 |
OCLC Number |
61667650 |
Subjects |
Water quality management--United States--Case studies ;
Nonpoint source pollution--United States--Management--Case studies ;
Nonpoint source pollution--Management
|
Additional Subjects |
Water treatment ;
Surface waters ;
Manuals ;
Water quality management ;
Ranking ;
Rivers ;
Lakes ;
Streams ;
Agriculture ;
Cost analysis ;
Case studies ;
Priorities
|
Internet Access |
|
Holdings |
Library |
Call Number |
Additional Info |
Location |
Last Modified |
Checkout Status |
EJBD |
EPA 506-2-89-003 |
|
Headquarters Library/Washington,DC |
07/08/2015 |
ELBD ARCHIVE |
EPA 506-2-89-003 |
Received from HQ |
AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH |
10/04/2023 |
ELBD |
EPA 506-2-89-003 |
|
AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH |
07/26/2022 |
NTIS |
PB92-233063 |
Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. |
|
07/26/2022 |
|
Collation |
vi, 39 pages ; 28 cm |
Abstract |
The manual presents six examples of how states identify their priorities for treatment of impaired or threatened water bodies. These case studies are intended to help you as a water quality manager to develop or refine your own process for ranking NPS impaired or threatened water bodies. The manual does not provide 'cookbook' approaches to ranking water bodies. Rather, it provides examples that you may modify to suit your state's approach to managing NPS pollution. State and federal water quality managers are encouraged to use or adapt these examples to their state NPS management programs where appropriate so that selected projects: (1) restore the greatest beneficial uses at a reasonable cost, and (2) increase the likelihood of a successful NPS project--given available resources and program authority. |
Notes |
"EPA 506/2-89/003." "August 7, 1989." Includes bibliographical references (pages 38-39). Photocopy. |