Main Title |
Chemically active fluid-bed process for sulphur removal during gasification of heavy fuel oil : (third phase) / |
Author |
Craig, J. W. E., ;
Craig, J. W. T. ;
Johnes, G. L. ;
Kowszun, Z. ;
Lyon, D. ;
Malkin., L. S.
|
Other Authors |
|
CORP Author |
Esso Research Centre, Abingdon (England).;Industrial Environmental Research Lab., Research Triangle Park, N.C. |
Publisher |
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Energy, Minerals, and Industry, Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory ; For sale by the National Technical Information Service, |
Year Published |
1976 |
Report Number |
EPA 600-2-76-248; EPA-68-02-1359; EPA-ROAP-21ADD-BE |
Stock Number |
22161 |
OCLC Number |
03853883 |
ISBN |
pbk. |
Subjects |
Petroleum as fuel ;
Petroleum--Refining--Desulfurization
|
Additional Subjects |
Fluidized bed processors ;
Desulfurization ;
Fuel oil ;
Air pollution control ;
Gasification ;
Electric power plants ;
Limestone ;
Calcium oxides ;
Performance evaluation ;
Manufactured gas ;
Pilot plants ;
Sulfur oxides ;
Process charting ;
Tables(Data) ;
Sampling ;
Chemically active fluid bed process
|
Internet Access |
|
Holdings |
Library |
Call Number |
Additional Info |
Location |
Last Modified |
Checkout Status |
EKBD |
EPA-600/2-76-248 |
|
Research Triangle Park Library/RTP, NC |
06/20/2003 |
ELBD ARCHIVE |
EPA 600-2-76-248 |
Received from HQ |
AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH |
10/04/2023 |
ELBD RPS |
EPA 600-2-76-248 |
repository copy |
AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH |
02/24/2020 |
ESAD |
EPA 600-2-76-248 |
|
Region 10 Library/Seattle,WA |
03/23/2010 |
NTIS |
PB-268 492 |
Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. |
|
07/26/2022 |
|
Collation |
xi, 596 pages : illustrations ; 28 cm. |
Abstract |
The report describes the third phase of studies on the CAFB process for desulfurization/gasification of heavy fuel oil in a bed of hot lime. Major conclusions relating to process performance and operability are: (1) water, either in the fuel or in the fluidizing air, has a strongly adverse effect on desulfurizing efficiency; (2) good desulfurizing efficiencies are obtainable at very low stone replacement rates; (3) process performance can be expressed as a statistically derived equation; (4) a burnback burner is feasible for coke removal; (5) SO2/stone disposal by sulfation is not feasible, but dead-burning looks promising; and (6) most trace elements are retained in the bed. Among tasks included in this phase were: (1) batch reactor evaluation of three limestones and gasification/desulfurization of a vacuum bottoms fuel; (2) two pilot plant runs using deep beds and demonstrating improved operational techniques; (3) development of a statistical method for analyzing results of the two pilot plant test runs and reconciling them with earlier results; (4) sulfation of bed material as a means of disposing of SO2 and spent lime; (5) dead-burning as a means of treating spent bed material prior to disposal; (6) retention of the bed material of a wide range of trace elements contained in the fuel; and (7) demonstration of a burn-back burner to overcome coke lay-down in cyclone inlets. |
Notes |
Prepared under contract no. 68-02-1359, ROAP no. 21ADD-BE, program element no. 1ABO13. Issued Sept. 1976. Includes bibliographical references. |