Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog


Main Title The clean water state revolving fund funding framework : funding to solve our nation's water quality problems : moving towards the watershed approach.
CORP Author Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Water.
Publisher U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Municipal Support Division,
Year Published 1996
Report Number EPA 832-B-96-005
Stock Number PB97-120364
OCLC Number 36236649
Subjects Federal aid to water quality management--United States ; Water quality management--United States--Finance ; Watershed management--United States--Finance ; Water quality management--Finance ; Watershed management--Finance ; Environmental law--United States--States ; Water, Underground--Protection--States--Finance ; Watersheds
Additional Subjects Funding ; Water pollution control ; Government policies ; Nonpoint sources ; Estuaries ; Water quality management ; Loans ; Investments ; Priorities ; Responsibilities ; Infrastructure ; Clean Water Acts ; State government ; Program management ; State Revolving Fund ; Intended Use Plan
Internet Access
Description Access URL
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
EJBD ARCHIVE EPA 832-B-96-005 Headquarters Library/Washington,DC 12/02/2009
EJBD  EPA 832-B-96-005 Headquarters Library/Washington,DC 12/02/2009
ELBD RPS EPA 832-B-96-005 repository copy AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH 04/06/2015
NTIS  PB97-120364 Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. 07/26/2022
Collation 11 pages : illustrations ; 28 cm
The purpose of this guidance is to clarify Federal policy regarding the eligibility of nonpoint source and estuary projects for State Revolving Fund (SRF) assistance and to enhance the process of making future eligibility decisions at the state level. An Intended Use Plan (IUP) can be developed by utilizing existing water quality and watershed information. States can use this document to: (1) evaluate and determine relative priorities among their water quality problems; (2) select, for SRF funding, projects and activities that address identified priorities; and (3) enhance the participation of the public in the process. Three alternatives are described: Integrated State Priority System for Wastewater, Nonpoint Source and Estuary Projects; Goals Approach (Statewide or Watershed); and De Minimus Pilot Process for Documenting Non-traditional SRF Projects.
Cover title. "October 1996." "EPA 832-B-96-005."