Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you have safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Contact Us

Grantee Research Project Results

Final Report: Aptamer Capture and Optical Interferometric Detection of Cyanobacteria

EPA Grant Number: R833839
Title: Aptamer Capture and Optical Interferometric Detection of Cyanobacteria
Investigators: Campbell, Daniel P , Ellington, Andy , Xu, Jie
Institution: Georgia Institute of Technology , The University of Texas at Austin
EPA Project Officer: Aja, Hayley
Project Period: June 1, 2008 through April 30, 2011 (Extended to January 31, 2013)
Project Amount: $600,000
RFA: Development and Evaluation of Innovative Approaches for the Quantitative Assessment of Pathogens and Cyanobacteria and Their Toxins in Drinking Water (2007) RFA Text |  Recipients Lists
Research Category: Drinking Water , Water

Objective:

The objective of this program is to take the optical interferometric sensor that has been under development at the Georgia Tech Research Institute for the past 2 decades and configured it to detect and monitor a series of cyanobacterial toxins. After initial testing with known antibodies for a series of cyanobacterial toxins, the detection scheme will convert over to aptamers to provide a more rugged, reusable sensor for field deployment.

Cyanobacterial toxins have been recognized as a potential hazard in drinking water throughout the world. These bacteria are ubiquitous, growing wherever the conditions are favorable that includes almost any standing water one can imagine such as a freshwater pond, a swampy area, a dog’s water bowl and even one’s family’s toilet. Cyanobacterial toxins have been categorized into three groups based on their chemical structures. The toxins with highest priority are the neurotoxins anatoxin-a, cylindrospermopsin and most frequently found microcystin-LR. Their chemical structures of the more common toxins are shown in Figure 1.

1 grating coupler2 and SPR.3 The interferometric sensors generally have the highest sensitivity, compared to SPR and grating coupler-based sensors. This is mainly based on possibility of using large interaction length values resulting in enhanced sensitivity. A typical value of 1.5 cm is used for the interferometer, being an order of magnitude larger than the typical values of 1 mm for the grating coupler and 10-100 μm for the SPR sensors. We have developed a planar waveguide interferometric sensor capable of simultaneously detecting a wide array of analytes, including toxins, viruses, spores and whole cell bacteria as well as chemical threats in a fast, direct and sensitive method.1, 4 The waveguide is fabricated with an array of sensing interferometers capable of detecting multiple analytes at once and requiring only a single light source and detector to analyze the multiple sampling channels fabricated onto a single 1.6 x 3.3 cm glass substrate. Sensitivities for this sensor are in the pg/ml, <1000 cfu/ml, <.0005 HA units/ml and/or ppt levels of proteins, spores/cells, viruses and/or chemicals, respectively.

At the heart of the GTRI optical sensor is a planar optical waveguide. Planar waveguides are related to fiber optic waveguides in that a high refractive index material is used to guide the light within its confines through total internal reflection. Whereas a fiber optic’s high refractive index core is surrounded by a lower refractive index cladding, the planar waveguide has the high refractive index waveguiding layer deposited on top of a lower refractive index planar substrate. Planar waveguides have evanescent fields, the tail of the electromagnetic field associated with the propagation of light, sensitive to index of refraction changes in the volume immediately above the waveguide surface. These fields extend up to 500 nanometers (nm) above the surface. Coupling a bioreceptor, such as an antibody, to the waveguide surface provides the basis for a biosensor (Figure 1). Briefly, light from a diode laser is coupled into the planar waveguide with a grating etched in the glass substrate. When a test solution containing the target antigen is introduced to the functionalized waveguide, the antigen binds to the receptor and displaces water near the waveguide surface causing a change in the velocity of the propagating light. To measure this change, an adjacent but unperturbed reference beam is optically combined with the sensing beam (Mach-Zender interferometer), creating an interference pattern of alternating dark and light fringes (Figure 2). When refractive index changes occur in the sensing arm, the interference pattern shifts, producing a resultant change in the relative phase that is measured using a Fourier transform algorithm indicating the presence and concentration of the target antigen. No secondary or reporter antibody is required. With detection sensitivities on the order of 0.01 radians, refractive index changes of less than 10-6 can be measured. This design provides a direct, label-free and reagentless means of detection.

 

 

Schneider, B. H.; Edwards, J. G.; Hartman, N. F., Hartman interferometer: versatile integrated optic sensor for label-free, real time quantification of nucleic acids, proteins, and pathogens. Clinical Chemistry 1997, 43 (9), 1757-1763.

  • Nellen, P. M.; Lukosz, W., Model experiments with integrated optical input grating couplers as direct immunosensors. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 1991, 6 (6), 517-525.
  • (a) Koubova, V.; Brynda, E.; Karasova, L.; Skvor, J. H., J.; Dostalek, J.; Tobiska, P.; Rosicky, J., Detection of foodborne pathogens using surface plasmon resonance biosensors. Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical 2001, 74 (1-3), 100-105; (b) Oh, B.-K.; Lee, W.; Kim, Y.-K.; Lee, W. H.; Choi, J.-W., Surface plasmon resonance immunosensor using self-assembled protein G for the detection of Salmonella paratyphi. Journal of Biotechnology 2004, 111 (1), 1-8.
  • (a) Hartman, N. F.; Cobb, J. M.; Edwards, J. G., Optical system-on-a-chip for chemical and biochemical sensing: the platform. Proc. SPIE 1999, 3537, 0-7; (b) Xu, J.; Suarez, D.; Gottfried, D. S., Detection of avian influenza virus using an interferometric biosensor. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2007, 389 (4), 1193-1199.
  • Singh, S.; Srivastava, A.; Oh, H.-M.; Ahn, C.-Y.; Choi, G.-G.; Asthana, R. K., Recent trends in development of biosensors for detection of microcystin. Toxicon 2012, 60 (5), 878-894.
  • Falconer, I. R., Measurement of toxins from blue-green algae in water and foodstuffs. In Algal Toxins in Seafood and Drinking Water, Falconer, I. R., Ed. Academic Press: London, 1993; pp 165–175.
  • (a) Campbell, D. L.; Lawton, L. A.; Beattie, K. A.; Codd, G. A., Comparative assessment of the specificity of the brine shrimp and Microtox assay to hepatotoxic (microcystin-LR-containing) cyanobacteria. Environ. Toxicol. Water Qual 1994, 9, 71-77; (b) Sangolkar, L. N.; Maske, S. S.; Chakrabarti, T., Methods for determining microcystins (peptide hepatotoxins) and microcystin-producing cyanobacteria. Wat. Res. 2006, 40, 3485-3496.
  • Pelander, A.; Ojanpera, I.; Lahti, K.; Niinivaara, K.; Vuori, E., Visual detection of cyanobacterial hepatotoxins by thin-layer chromatography and application to water analysis. Wat. Res. 2000, 34, 2643-2652.
  • An, J. S.; Carmichael, W. W., Use of a colorimetric protein phosphatase inhibition assay and enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for the study of microcystins and nodularins. Toxicon 1994, 32, 1495-1507.
  • Nagata, S.; Soutome, H.; Tsutsumi, T.; Hasegawa, A.; Sekijima, M.; Sugamata, M.; Harada, K.-I.; Suganuma, M.; Ueno, Y., Novel monoclonal antibodies against microcystin and their protective activity for hepatotoxicity. Nat. Toxins 1995, 3, 78-86.
  • Metcalf, J. S.; Codd, G. A., Analysis of cyanobacterial toxins by immunological methods. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2003, 16, 103-112.
  • Bouaïcha, N.; Maatouk, I.; Vincent, G.; Levi, Y., A colorimetric and fluorometric microplate assay for the detection of microcystin-LR in drinking water without preconcentration. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2002, 40, 1677-1683.
  • Rapala, J.; Erkomaa, K.; Kukkonen, J.; Sivonen, K.; Lahti, K., Detection of microcystins with protein phosphatase inhibition assay, high-performance liquid chromatography–UV detection and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay: Comparison of methods. Analytica Chimica Acta 2002, 466 (2), 213-231.
  • ISO, Water Quality: Determination of Microcystins – Method Using Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) and High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) with Ultraviolet (UV) Detection. Geneva, Switzerland, 2005; Vol. ISO 20179:2005.
  • Lawton, L.; Edwards, C.; Codd, G. A., Extraction and high-performance liquid chromatographic method for the determination of microcystins in raw and treated waters. Analyst 1994, 119, 1525-1530.
  • Welker, M.; Fastner, J.; Erhard, M.; Dohren, H. v., Applications of MALDI-TOF MS analysis in cyanotoxins research. Environ. Toxicol. 2002, 17, 367-374.
  • Zhang, F.; Yang, S. H.; Kang, T. Y.; Cha, G. S.; Nam, H.; Meyerhoff, M. E., A rapid competitive binding nonseparation electrochemical enzyme immunoassay (NEEIA) test strip for microcystin-LR (MCLR) determination. Biosensors and bioelectronics 2007, 22 (7), 1419-1425.
  • Perron, M.-C.; Qiu, B.; Boucher, N.; Bellemare, F.; Juneau, P., Use of chlorophyll a fluorescence to detect the effect of microcystins on photosynthesis and photosystem II energy fluxes of green algae. Toxicon 2012, 59 (5), 567-577.
  • Hu, C.; Gan, N.; He, Z.; Song, L., A novel chemiluminescent immunoassay for microcystin (MC) detection based on gold nanoparticles label and its application to MC analysis in aquatic environmental samples. Intern. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2008, 88, 267-277.
  • Robillot, C.; Vinh, J.; Puiseux-Dao, S.; Hennion, M. C., Hepatotoxins production kinetics of the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa PCC 7820, as determined by HPLC-mass spectrometry and protein phosphatase bioassay. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34, 3372-3378.
  • Spoof, L.; Karlsson, K.; Meriluoto, J., High-performance liquid chromatographic separation of microcystins and nodularin, cyanobacterial peptide toxins, on C18 and amide C16 sorbents. Journal of Chromatography A 2001, 909 (2), 225-236.
  • Zhang, L.; Ping, X.; Yang, Z., Determination of microcystin-LR in surface water using high-performance liquid chromatography/tandem electrospray ionization mass detector. Talanta 2004, 62 (1), 191-198.
  • Sano, T.; Nohara, K.; Shiraishi, F.; Kaya, K., A method for micro-determination of total microcystin content in waterblooms of cyanobacteria (blue–green algae). Int. J. Environ. Analyt. Chem. 1992, 49, 163-170.
  • Tanaka, Y.; Takenaka, S.; Matsuo, H.; Kitamori, S.; Tokiwa, H., Levels of microcystins in Japanese lakes. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 1993, 39, 21-27.
  • Lei, L.-M.; Wu, Y.-S.; Gan, N.-Q.; Song, L.-R., An ELISA-like time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay for microcystin detection. Clinica Chimica Acta 2004, 348 (1–2), 177-180.
  • Bateman, K. P.; Thibault, P.; Douglas, D. J.; White, R. L., Mass spectral analyses of microcystins from toxic cyanobacteria using on-line chromatographic and electrophoretic separations. Journal of Chromatography A 1995, 712 (1), 253-268.
  • Li, P. C. H.; Hu, S.; Lam, P. K. S., Development of a Capillary Zone Electrophoretic Method for the Rapid Separation and Detection of Hepatotoxic Microcystins. Marine Pollution Bulletin 1999, 39 (1–12), 250-254.
  • Harada, K.-i.; Mayumi, T.; Shimada, T.; Suzuki, M.; Kondo, F.; Watanabe, M. F., Occurrence of four depsipeptides, aeruginopeptins, together with microcystins from toxic cyanobacteria. Tetrahedron Letters 1993, 34 (38), 6091-6094.
  • Ding, Y.; Mutharasan, R., Highly Sensitive and Rapid Detection of Microcystin-LR in Source and Finished Water Samples Using Cantilever Sensors. Environmental Science & Technology 2010, 45 (4), 1490-1496.
  • (a) Lato, S. M.; Boles, A. R.; Ellington, A. D., In vitro selection of RNA lectins: using combinatorial chemistry to interpret ribozyme evolution. Chemistry & Biology 1995, 2 (5), 291-303; (b) Chu, T. C.; Pai, S. S.; Levy, M.; Ellington, A. D., Cell specific aptamers and the proximity ligation assay for sensitively typing cells. Tumor Biol 2007, in press; (c) Xu, W.; Ellington, A. D., Anti-peptide aptamers recognize amino acid sequence and bind a protein epitope, 10.1073/pnas.93.15.7475. PNAS 1996, 93 (15), 7475-7480; (d) Weiss, S.; Proske, D.; Neumann, M.; Groschup, M.; Kretzschmar, H.; Famulok, M.; Winnacker, E., RNA aptamers specifically interact with the prion protein PrP. J. Virol. 1997, 71 (11), 8790-8797.
  • Ng, A.; Chinnappan, R.; Eissa, S.; Liu, H.; Tlili, C.; Zourob, M., Selection, Characterization, and Biosensing Application of High Affinity Congener-Specific Microcystin-Targeting Aptamers. Environmental Science & Technology 2012, 46 (19), 10697-10703.
  • Supplemental Keywords:

    Interferometric sensor, aptamer, microcystin, waveguide, water, environmental chemistry, health risk assessment, environmental monitoring, drinking water, environmental engineering, microbial contamination, monitoring, real time analysis, microbial risk assessment, gene microarray assay, aquatic organisms, other - risk assessment, early warning, drinking water contaminants, cyanobacteria;, RFA, Scientific Discipline, INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION, Water, Health Risk Assessment, Environmental Chemistry, Drinking Water, Environmental Engineering, Environmental Monitoring, microbial contamination, gene microarray assay, early warning, microbial risk assessment, monitoring, aquatic organisms, drinking water system, drinking water contaminants, other - risk assessment, cyanobacteria

    Progress and Final Reports:

    Original Abstract
  • 2008
  • 2009 Progress Report
  • 2010
  • 2011 Progress Report
  • Top of Page

    The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

    Project Research Results

    • 2011 Progress Report
    • 2010
    • 2009 Progress Report
    • 2008
    • Original Abstract

    Site Navigation

    • Grantee Research Project Results Home
    • Grantee Research Project Results Basic Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Advanced Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Fielded Search
    • Publication search
    • EPA Regional Search

    Related Information

    • Search Help
    • About our data collection
    • Research Grants
    • P3: Student Design Competition
    • Research Fellowships
    • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)
    Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
    Last updated April 28, 2023
    United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Discover.

    • Accessibility
    • Budget & Performance
    • Contracting
    • EPA www Web Snapshot
    • Grants
    • No FEAR Act Data
    • Plain Writing
    • Privacy
    • Privacy and Security Notice

    Connect.

    • Data.gov
    • Inspector General
    • Jobs
    • Newsroom
    • Open Government
    • Regulations.gov
    • Subscribe
    • USA.gov
    • White House

    Ask.

    • Contact EPA
    • EPA Disclaimers
    • Hotlines
    • FOIA Requests
    • Frequent Questions

    Follow.