Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you have safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Contact Us

Grantee Research Project Results

2004 Progress Report: Measurement, Modeling and Analysis Methods for Airborne Carbonaceous Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5)

EPA Grant Number: R831086
Title: Measurement, Modeling and Analysis Methods for Airborne Carbonaceous Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5)
Investigators: Chow, Judith C. , Chen, Lung-Wen Antony , Watson, John L. , Arnott, William P. , Barber, Peter W. , Paredes-Miranda, Guadalupe , Moosmuller, Hans
Institution: Desert Research Institute
EPA Project Officer: Chung, Serena
Project Period: September 1, 2003 through August 31, 2006 (Extended to August 31, 2008)
Project Period Covered by this Report: September 1, 2003 through August 31, 2004
Project Amount: $449,456
RFA: Measurement, Modeling, and Analysis Methods for Airborne Carbonaceous Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) (2003) RFA Text |  Recipients Lists
Research Category: Particulate Matter , Air Quality and Air Toxics , Air

Objective:

The objectives for this project are to: (1) determine which organic carbon (OC), elemental carbon (EC), and carbonate carbon (CC) compounds evolve at different temperatures; (2) specify how optical properties differ and change between particles in the air, particles on a filter, and particles undergoing changes caused by thermal analysis; (3) quantify difference in carbon fractions determined by commonly used thermal and optical analysis methods; and (4) optimize thermal and optical monitoring methods to meet multiple needs of health, visibility, global climate, and source apportionment.

Progress Summary:

Several tasks have been carried out to understand critical questions regarding thermal/optical carbon analysis. A radiative transfer scheme that considers absorption, scattering, and distribution of light-absorbing EC particles collected on a quartz-fiber filter was developed to explain simultaneous filter reflectance and transmittance observations prior to and during thermal/optical analysis. Pyrolized and charred organic carbon (POC) during thermal analysis reduces filter reflectance and transmittance in a way that supports a uniform distribution of POC throughout the filter. Small amounts of POC are found to dominate the incremental absorbance. Visual examination of filter darkening at different temperature stages confirms that much of the substantial charring takes place within the filter, possibly caused by adsorbed organic vapors or diffusion of vaporized particles. It also is observed that thermal/optical analysis using reflectance pyrolysis corrections (i.e., TOR) yields equivalent OC/EC splits for widely divergent temperature protocols. EC determined by simultaneous thermal/optical transmittance (TOT) corrections is lower than by TOR and varies appreciably between different protocols.

It has been found that many detailed specifications of thermal analysis, such as temperature plateau, analysis/residence time per temperature plateau, and analysis atmosphere—usually unreported in the literature, contribute to the variability in the OC/EC split and carbon fraction measurements. Low-temperature (< 250°C) carbon fractions appear to be independent of the trace oxygen level in the analysis atmosphere, but are sensitive to analytical temperature. Higher temperature OC fractions (450-550°C) depend on both temperature and oxidant level. Mineral oxides that coexist with carbonaceous material may decompose during heating, providing the oxygen necessary for EC combustion and changing the OC/EC split. These biases propagate into the current evaluations of health effects, visibility reduction, and climate forcing resulting from carbonaceous aerosol. Audit procedures for temperature, atmosphere, and optics during thermal analysis were developed. These techniques are systematized into procedures that can be applied to a wide variety of instruments, thereby allowing variability in the analysis to be reduced.

Future Activities:

During the next reporting period we plan to:

  • Improve the precision of carbon fraction measurements and understand their responses to the analytical protocols, sources, and types of carbonaceous material.
  • Develop standard or reference carbonaceous material samples for the calibration of thermal/optical analysis methods.
  • Link light-absorption properties of fine particles and related radiative forcing estimates to the thermal/optical EC measurements and quantify their uncertainties.
  • Refine the current thermal/optical protocols to meet the needs of health, visibility, global climate, and source apportionment.


Journal Articles on this Report : 3 Displayed | Download in RIS Format

Publications Views
Other project views: All 108 publications 32 publications in selected types All 29 journal articles
Publications
Type Citation Project Document Sources
Journal Article Chen L-WA, Chow JC, Watson JG, Moosmuller H, Arnott WP. Modeling reflectance and transmittance of quartz-fiber filter samples containing elemental carbon particles: implications for thermal/optical analysis. Journal of Aerosol Science 2004;35(6):765-780. R831086 (2004)
R831086 (Final)
  • Abstract: Science Direct-Abstract
    Exit
  • Journal Article Chow JC, Watson JG, Chen L-WA, Arnott WP, Moosmuller H, Fung K. Equivalence of elemental carbon by thermal/optical reflectance and transmittance with different temperature protocols. Environmental Science & Technology 2004;38(16):4414-4422. R831086 (2004)
    R831086 (Final)
  • Abstract from PubMed
  • Full-text: ES&T-Full Text HTML
    Exit
  • Abstract: ES&T-Abstract
    Exit
  • Other: ES&T-Full Text PDF
    Exit
  • Journal Article El-Zanan HS, Lowenthal DH, Zielinska B, Chow JC, Kumar N. Determination of the organic aerosol mass to organic carbon ratio in IMPROVE samples. Chemosphere 2005;60(4):485-496. R831086 (2004)
    R831086 (2005)
    R831086 (Final)
  • Abstract from PubMed
  • Abstract: Science Direct-Abstract
    Exit
  • Other: Mendeley-Abstract
    Exit
  • Supplemental Keywords:

    thermal protocols, optical monitoring methods, visibility, light-absorbing carbon, black carbon, radiative forcing, air toxics, particulate matter, PM2.5, aerosol analyzers, aerosol particles, air sampling, airborne particulate matter, carbon aerosols, carbon particles, carbonaceous particulate,, RFA, Air, Ecosystem Protection/Environmental Exposure & Risk, Scientific Discipline, PHYSICAL ASPECTS, Physical Processes, particulate matter, Air Quality, Environmental Chemistry, Engineering, Chemistry, & Physics, Analytical Chemistry, Monitoring/Modeling, air toxics, Environmental Engineering, aerosol particles, atmospheric dispersion models, particle size, air sampling, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, carbon particles, emissions, chemical characteristics, air quality modeling, environmental monitoring, measurement methods, aersol particles, airborne particulate matter, atmospheric particles, modeling studies, thermal desorption, particulate matter mass, air quality model, particulate organic carbon, analysis of organic particulate matter, exposure, carbon aerosols, aerosol analyzers, air quality models, atmospheric particulate matter, particle phase molecular markers, ultrafine particulate matter, chemical speciation sampling, particle size measurement, atmospheric measurements, air modeling, carbonaceous particulate matter, PM 2.5

    Progress and Final Reports:

    Original Abstract
  • 2005 Progress Report
  • 2006 Progress Report
  • 2007 Progress Report
  • Final Report
  • Top of Page

    The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

    Project Research Results

    • Final Report
    • 2007 Progress Report
    • 2006 Progress Report
    • 2005 Progress Report
    • Original Abstract
    108 publications for this project
    29 journal articles for this project

    Site Navigation

    • Grantee Research Project Results Home
    • Grantee Research Project Results Basic Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Advanced Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Fielded Search
    • Publication search
    • EPA Regional Search

    Related Information

    • Search Help
    • About our data collection
    • Research Grants
    • P3: Student Design Competition
    • Research Fellowships
    • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)
    Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
    Last updated April 28, 2023
    United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Discover.

    • Accessibility
    • Budget & Performance
    • Contracting
    • EPA www Web Snapshot
    • Grants
    • No FEAR Act Data
    • Plain Writing
    • Privacy
    • Privacy and Security Notice

    Connect.

    • Data.gov
    • Inspector General
    • Jobs
    • Newsroom
    • Open Government
    • Regulations.gov
    • Subscribe
    • USA.gov
    • White House

    Ask.

    • Contact EPA
    • EPA Disclaimers
    • Hotlines
    • FOIA Requests
    • Frequent Questions

    Follow.