EPA's Report on the Environment
Acidity in Lakes and Streams
Acid deposition can have serious effects on aquatic ecosystems. For example, aquatic organisms in acidified waters can develop calcium deficiencies that weaken bones and exoskeletons and cause eggs to be weak or brittle. Acidified waters can impair the ability of fish gills to extract oxygen from water and change the mobility of certain trace metals (e.g., aluminum, cadmium, manganese, iron, arsenic, mercury), which in turn can place fish and other species sensitive to these metals at risk (NAPAP, 1991). The Acid Deposition indicator explains the factors that contribute to acid deposition and describes how acid deposition patterns have changed over the last 25 years.
The susceptibility of a water body to acidification depends on the ability of the water and watershed soils to neutralize the acid deposition it receives. The best measure of this ability is acid neutralizing capacity (ANC), which characterizes the amount of dissolved compounds that will counteract acidity. Every body of water has a measurable ANC, which depends largely on the surrounding watershed’s physical characteristics, such as geology, soils, and size. The ANC of a body of water reflects the relative proportions of positive and negative ions entering the water from sources such as atmospheric inputs and the soil and bedrock surrounding and underlying the water body. The higher the ANC, the more acid a water body can neutralize and the less susceptible it is to acidification. As ANC approaches zero, the ability to neutralize acidity decreases. Surface water with an ANC greater than 200 microequivalents per liter (µeq/L) is usually considered insensitive to acidification; surface water with an ANC less than 50 µeq/L is considered highly sensitive to acidification (is often seasonally acidic); and surface water with an ANC less than 0 µeq/L is considered chronically acidic, meaning the watershed no longer has the capacity to neutralize further acid deposition (U.S. EPA, 1988, 2003). ANC can be negative when anions exceed non-proton cations (i.e., when there are free protons [H+ ions] in solution).
The National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program identified several regions in the U.S. as containing many of the surface waters sensitive to acidification (Exhibit 2). Where soil buffering capacity is poor, lakes and streams may be vulnerable to acidification (NAPAP, 1991).
This indicator is derived from ANC measurements on probability survey samples representing 8,664 lakes and 75,113 km of streams in the three geographic regions shown in Exhibit 2. These measurements were collected as part of the Temporally Integrated Monitoring of Ecosystems (TIME) project and on 74 additional acid-sensitive lakes and 75 acid-sensitive streams in the Long-Term Monitoring (LTM) project, for which data were available between 1991 and 2012 (U.S. EPA, 2014a). The lakes sampled include only those in areas potentially sensitive to acidification with areas greater than 1 hectare. This indicator focuses only on the northeastern U.S.; because monitoring is not ongoing for western, Midwestern, and southeastern water bodies, trend data for those parts of the country are not available.
What the Data Show
Between the early 1990s and 2012, ANC in lakes in the Adirondack Mountains and New England, and in streams in the Mid-Atlantic Appalachians (southern New York, west-central Pennsylvania, Virginia, and eastern West Virginia) increased to a degree where many water bodies that were considered “chronically acidic” in the early 1990s were no longer classified as such in 2012 (Exhibit 1). Specifically, between 1991-1994 and 2012, this analysis estimates that the percent of chronically acidic water bodies decreased in the Adirondack Mountains (from 15.0 percent to 6.9 percent) and in New England (from 5.5 percent to 2.9 percent). Additionally, acid-sensitive streams in the Mid-Atlantic region of the Appalachian Mountains are also decreasing in acidity: the percent of chronically acidic streams in this region decreased from 4.3 percent in 1991-1994 to 3.5 percent in 2012. This trend suggests that surface waters in these three regions are beginning to recover from acidification, though acidic surface waters are still found in these regions.
The trend of increasing ANC in the Adirondack Mountains, New England, and the Mid-Atlantic Appalachian Mountains between the early 1990s and 2012 corresponds with a decrease in acid deposition in each of these regions (the Acid Deposition indicator) and reduced air emissions of the main precursors to acid deposition, which are sulfur dioxide (the Sulfur Dioxide Emissions indicator) and nitrogen oxides (the Nitrogen Oxides Emissions indicator).
- ANC sampling is limited to three regions, all in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic. (There is no long-term coverage in the Southeast, West, or Midwest.) These three regions were chosen for sampling because previous research has shown that they are among the most sensitive to acid deposition due to the soils and other watershed characteristics. In addition, as the Acid Deposition indicator shows, many of these regions receive the highest rates of acid deposition in the U.S. For these reasons, the waters sampled are likely to be at the greatest risk of becoming acidified.
- Interpreting trends for this indicator is complicated because multiple factors contribute to changes in ANC levels. For example, in areas where watershed soil characteristics are changing (e.g., decreases in concentrations of base cations in the soil), even dramatic reductions in acid deposition will not necessarily result in large rebounds in ANC levels.
Summary data in this indicator were provided by EPA’s Office of Atmospheric Programs and are taken from a publication documenting how surface waters have responded to reduced air emissions of acid rain precursors (U.S. EPA, 2003, 2014a) and from more recent unpublished results (U.S. EPA, 2014b). Trends are based on data collected in two networks: the TIME project and the LTM project, which are operated by numerous collaborators in state agencies, academic institutions, and other federal agencies. The trend data in this indicator are based on observations documented in several publications (U.S. EPA, 2003, 2014a).
For More Information
This page provides links to non-EPA websites that provide additional information about this topic. You will leave the EPA.gov domain, and EPA cannot attest to the accuracy of information on that non-EPA page. Providing links to a non-EPA website is not an endorsement of the other site or the information it contains by EPA or any of its employees. Also, be aware that the privacy protection provided on the EPA.gov domain (see Privacy and Security Notice) may not be available at the external link.
You will need the free Adobe Reader to view some of the files on this page. See EPA's PDF page to learn more.