Main Title |
Light-duty diesel gaseous emissions measurement : comparison of dilution tunnel test results to certification cell tests results / |
Author |
Alson, Jeffrey A.,
|
CORP Author |
Environmental Protection Agency, Ann Arbor, MI. Standards Development and Support Branch. |
Publisher |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air, Noise and Radiation, Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control, Emission Control Technology Division, Standards Development and Support Branch, |
Year Published |
1979 |
Report Number |
SDSB 79-04 |
Stock Number |
PB80-115991 |
OCLC Number |
714628978 |
Subjects |
Motor vehicles--Motors--Exhaust gas ;
Air--Pollution--Research ;
Trucks--Motors (Diesel) ;
Diesel motor exhaust gas ;
Trucks--Motors--Exhaust gas ;
Trucks--Motors (Diesel)--Testing
|
Additional Subjects |
Exhaust emissions ;
Concentration(Composition) ;
Comparison ;
Diesel engines ;
Carbon monoxide ;
Nitrogen oxides ;
Carbon dioxide ;
Hydrocarbons ;
Tests ;
Air pollution sampling ;
Light duty vehicles ;
Certification cell tests ;
Dilution tunnel tests
|
Internet Access |
|
Holdings |
Library |
Call Number |
Additional Info |
Location |
Last Modified |
Checkout Status |
ELBD ARCHIVE |
EPA SDSB-79-04 |
|
AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH |
01/03/2024 |
ELCD |
EPA SDSB 79-04 |
|
NVFEL Library/Ann Arbor, MI |
05/04/2011 |
DISPERSAL |
NTIS |
PB80-115991 |
Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. |
|
07/26/2022 |
|
Collation |
4, [5] pages : charts ; 28 cm |
Abstract |
This report summarizes gaseous emissions data for eleven light-duty diesel vehicles using both the standard certification test procedure and the dilution tunnel test procedure which incorporates particulate measurement. The greatest variability was found in the HC variability inherent in measuring HC and, in the extreme cases, also to equipment inconsistencies between the test cells, CO, NOx and CO2 data from the dilution tunnel test procedure were generally in good agreement with the certification data with the only trend being slightly lower NOx and CO2 values from the dilution tunnel. This is hypothesized as a possible dynamometer effect. It is concluded that there are no significant differences in the two test procedures with regards to the measurement of gaseous emissions. |
Notes |
Technical report. Cover title. "January, 1979." "SDSB 79-04." |