Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog
RECORD NUMBER: 65 OF 379Main Title | Comparative Analysis of Dioxins and Furans in Ambient Air by High Resolution and Electron Capture Mass Spectrometry. | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Author | Koester, C. J. ; Harless, R. L. ; Hites, R. A. ; | |||||||||||
CORP Author | Indiana Univ. at Bloomington.;Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Atmospheric Research and Exposure Assessment Lab. | |||||||||||
Publisher | c1992 | |||||||||||
Year Published | 1992 | |||||||||||
Report Number | EPA-R-812588; EPA/600/J-92/264; | |||||||||||
Stock Number | PB92-206440 | |||||||||||
Additional Subjects | Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins ; Polychlorinated dibenzofurans ; Mass spectroscopy ; Air pollution ; Air sampling ; Toxic materials ; Accuracy ; Error analysis ; Reprints ; High resolution mass spectrometry ; Electron capture mass spectrometry | |||||||||||
Holdings |
|
|||||||||||
Collation | 8p | |||||||||||
Abstract | Known mixtures and unknown atmospheric sample extracts containing polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDD/F) were analyzed by both electron impact, high resolution, mass spectrometry (HRMS) and by electron capture, negative ion, low resolution mass spectrometry (ECNI). PCDD/F concentrations measured by the two methods were comparable, typically agreeing with + or - 33%. The major difference between the two techniques is that HRMS easily detects 2,3,7,8- tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin but ECNI does not. Results suggest that ECNI can be a sensitive low cost alternative to HRMS for the determination of PCDD/F concentrations. |