Main Title |
Life cycle assessment for chemical agent resistant coating |
Other Authors |
|
CORP Author |
Battelle, Columbus, OH. ;Lockheed Martin Environmental, Las Vegas, NV.;National Risk Management Research Lab., Cincinnati, OH. |
Publisher |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory ; |
Year Published |
1996 |
Report Number |
EPA/600/R-96/104; 68-C4-0020; PB96-207378; EPA-68-C4-0020 |
Stock Number |
PB96-207378 |
OCLC Number |
36046355 |
Subjects |
Environmental protection--Research
|
Additional Subjects |
Life cycle management ;
Protective coatings ;
Performance tests ;
Environmental effects ;
Coating processes ;
Primers(Coatings) ;
Paint thinners ;
Surface coating ;
Military vehicles ;
Chemical agents ;
Alternatives ;
Parameters ;
Performance evaluation ;
Economic analysis ;
Cost estimation ;
Pollution prevention
|
Internet Access |
|
Holdings |
Library |
Call Number |
Additional Info |
Location |
Last Modified |
Checkout Status |
EHAD |
EPA/600-R-96-104 |
|
Region 1 Library/Boston,MA |
01/17/1997 |
EJDD |
EPA/600/R-96/104 |
|
Env Science Center Library/Ft Meade,MD |
04/11/1997 |
EJED |
EPA 600/R-96/104 |
|
OCSPP Chemical Library/Washington,DC |
11/21/2003 |
EKBD |
EPA-600/R-96-104 |
|
Research Triangle Park Library/RTP, NC |
03/14/1997 |
ELBD ARCHIVE |
EPA 600-R-96-104 |
Received from HQ |
AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH |
10/04/2023 |
DISPERSAL |
EMBD |
EPA/600/R-96/104 |
|
NRMRL/GWERD Library/Ada,OK |
12/06/1996 |
ESAD |
EPA 600-R-96-104 |
2 copies |
Region 10 Library/Seattle,WA |
06/02/2016 |
NTIS |
PB96-207378 |
Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. |
|
07/26/2022 |
|
Collation |
1 v. (various pagings) ; 28 cm. |
Abstract |
The report was developed to determine the optimum materials and equipment for applying chemical agent resistant coating (CARC) to vehicles at the Army Transportation Center at Fort Eustis, VA. A life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted to identify the performance, cost, and environmental impacts of various combinations of CARC materials and equipment. The variables for the study were the primer, thinner, CARC topcoat, and spray application equipment. Combinations of the variables were grouped to develop five alternatives. The recommended alternative would change the existing primer and application equipment, but retain the existing thinner and topcoat. The alternative would maintain required performance characteristics, achieve cost objectives, and result in low environmental impacts in relation to the other alternatives. |
Notes |
"September 1996." "EPA/600/R-96/104." "Contract no. 68-C4-0020." "Project officer, Kenneth R. Stone and Johnny Springer, Jr." Bibliography: p. 9-1 - 9-4. |