Main Title |
Evaluation of Propylene Carbonate in Air Logistics Center (ALC) Depainting Operations. |
Author |
Rosenthal, S. ;
Hooper, A. M. ;
|
CORP Author |
Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Edison, NJ.;Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. |
Publisher |
Sep 94 |
Year Published |
1994 |
Report Number |
EPA-68-C9-0033; EPA/600/R-94/176; |
Stock Number |
PB94-214681 |
Additional Subjects |
Aircraft maintenance ;
Paint removers ;
Air pollution control ;
Methyl ethyl ketone ;
Environmental chemical substitutes ;
Solvents ;
Solvent properties ;
Alternatives ;
Comparison ;
Radomes ;
Performance evaluation ;
Propylene carbonate ;
N-methylpyrrolidone ;
Dibasic esters ;
Depainting ;
Paint stripping ;
Oklahoma City Air Logistics Center ;
Tinker Air Force Base
|
Internet Access |
|
Holdings |
Library |
Call Number |
Additional Info |
Location |
Last Modified |
Checkout Status |
NTIS |
PB94-214681 |
Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. |
|
07/26/2022 |
|
Collation |
43p |
Abstract |
This report summarizes a two-phase, laboratory-scale screening study that evaluated solvent blends containing propylene carbonate (PC) as a potential replacement for methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) in aircraft radome depainting operations. The study was conducted at Oklahoma City Air Logistics Center (OC-ALC) at Tinker Air Force Base (TAFB). The first phase of this study screened the performance of three solvent blends provided by Texaco Chemical Company. These blends contained varying concentrations of PC, n-methyl pyrrolidone (NMP), dibasic ester (DBE), and other organic solvents. The performance of each blend was compared with that of MEK-both by the paint removal time and by a visual estimate of the amount of paint removed without any visible substrate damage (removal efficiency). Phase 2 test results revealed that PC Blend 2 performed favorably in comparison with MEK in removing paint from the fiberglass/epoxy (F/E) test panels and in subsequent paint adhesion tests, despite an indication of possible substrate damage. |