Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 174 OF 1132

OLS Field Name OLS Field Data
Main Title Chemical Oxidation for Arsenic Removal.
Author T. R. Holm ; S. D. Wilson
CORP Author Midwest Technology Assistance Center (MTAC), Champaign, Illinois.; Illinois State Water Survey Div., Champaign.; Environmental Protection Agency, Chicago, IL. Region V.
Year Published 2006
Report Number MATC-TR06-05; EPA-X829218-01; ISWS-CR-2006-10
Stock Number PB2009-103957
Additional Subjects Arsenic ; Oxidation ; Water treatment ; Illinois ; Portable water ; Filtration ; Potassium permanganate ; Contamination ; Iron ; Treatment facilities ; Sodium hypochlorite ; Water utilities ; Maximum contaminant level(MCL)
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
NTIS  PB2009-103957 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. NTIS 05/12/2010
Collation 22p
Abstract
The effects on arsenic (As) removal at iron removal water treatment plants of two common chemical oxidants, potassium permanganate (KMnO4) and sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), and ferric chloride (FeCl3) were characterized. On-site and laboratory experiments were performed using water from three Illinois water utilities whose potable water exceeds the As maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 10 mg L-1. Aeration, the most common iron removal process, was used as a point of reference. In all cases arsenic removal was improved (compared to aeration) by KMnO4 or NaOCl addition. Aeration had little effect on arsenic speciation; the proportions of As(III) and As(V) were essentially the same before and after aeration. Both KMnO4 and NaOCl oxidized As(III) to As(V). However, the KMnO4 dose depended only on the iron (Fe) concentration. On the other hand, NaOCl also reacts with ammonium (NH4 +) and the NaOCl dose depended on both Fe and NH4 + concentrations. Arsenic removal depended strongly on the Fe to As ratio with the best As removal at Fe to As values above 50. For the utility with the lowest As and highest Fe concentrations, oxidant addition alone was sufficient to satisfy the MCL. For the other two utilities both oxidant and FeCl3 had to be added to meet the MCL.