Main Title |
Recycle of Modified Fly Ash from Furnace Sorbent Injection. |
Author |
Kresovich, N. ;
Kaplan, N. ;
Stokes, E. A. ;
Clark, C. C. ;
Dahlin, R. S. ;
|
CORP Author |
Southern Research Inst., Birmingham, AL.;Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Air and Energy Engineering Research Lab. |
Year Published |
1988 |
Report Number |
EPA-R-812811; EPA/600/D-88/128; |
Stock Number |
PB88-220710 |
Additional Subjects |
Air pollution control ;
Furnaces ;
Sulfur dioxide ;
Fly ash ;
Sorbents ;
Cost analysis ;
Pilot plants ;
Limestone ;
Disintegration ;
Calcium oxides ;
Cyclone separators ;
Waste recycling ;
Furnace sorbent injection ;
Stationary sources
|
Holdings |
Library |
Call Number |
Additional Info |
Location |
Last Modified |
Checkout Status |
NTIS |
PB88-220710 |
Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. |
|
07/26/2022 |
|
Collation |
20p |
Abstract |
The paper discusses technical and economic studies to assess the impact of recycle on the furnace sorbent injection process. Levelized costs of various recycle schemes were compared to baseline (non-recycle) costs using the EPA LIMB Cost Model and the LIMB Recycle Model. Laboratory and pilot-scale tests were performed to evaluate the technical feasibility of the recycle schemes. Use of recycle to enable replacement of expensive hydrated lime sorbent with limestone suggested possible savings of 21 percent in 15-year levelized costs per ton of SO2 removed. The process may not be feasible, however, due to sorbent disintegration. Recycle with quicklime and hydrated lime as sorbents gave projected savings of up to $79 and $127 per ton of SO2 removed, respectively. Pilot-scale studies showed that 78-90 percent hydration of unused sorbent could be achieved in 30-263 minutes. Of the separation processes investigated, only cyclonic separation and steam elutriation were found to be feasible. |