Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog


Main Title Life cycle assessment for chemical agent resistant coating
Other Authors
Author Title of a Work
Stone, Kenneth R.
Springer, Johnny
CORP Author Battelle, Columbus, OH. ;Lockheed Martin Environmental, Las Vegas, NV.;National Risk Management Research Lab., Cincinnati, OH.
Publisher U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory ;
Year Published 1996
Report Number EPA/600/R-96/104; 68-C4-0020; PB96-207378; EPA-68-C4-0020
Stock Number PB96-207378
OCLC Number 36046355
Subjects Environmental protection--Research
Additional Subjects Life cycle management ; Protective coatings ; Performance tests ; Environmental effects ; Coating processes ; Primers(Coatings) ; Paint thinners ; Surface coating ; Military vehicles ; Chemical agents ; Alternatives ; Parameters ; Performance evaluation ; Economic analysis ; Cost estimation ; Pollution prevention
Internet Access
Description Access URL
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
EHAD  EPA/600-R-96-104 Region 1 Library/Boston,MA 01/17/1997
EJDD  EPA/600/R-96/104 Env Science Center Library/Ft Meade,MD 04/11/1997
EJED  EPA 600/R-96/104 OCSPP Chemical Library/Washington,DC 11/21/2003
EKBD  EPA-600/R-96-104 Research Triangle Park Library/RTP, NC 03/14/1997
ELBD ARCHIVE EPA 600-R-96-104 Received from HQ AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH 10/04/2023 DISPERSAL
EMBD  EPA/600/R-96/104 NRMRL/GWERD Library/Ada,OK 12/06/1996
ESAD  EPA 600-R-96-104 2 copies Region 10 Library/Seattle,WA 06/02/2016
NTIS  PB96-207378 Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. 07/26/2022
Collation 1 v. (various pagings) ; 28 cm.
The report was developed to determine the optimum materials and equipment for applying chemical agent resistant coating (CARC) to vehicles at the Army Transportation Center at Fort Eustis, VA. A life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted to identify the performance, cost, and environmental impacts of various combinations of CARC materials and equipment. The variables for the study were the primer, thinner, CARC topcoat, and spray application equipment. Combinations of the variables were grouped to develop five alternatives. The recommended alternative would change the existing primer and application equipment, but retain the existing thinner and topcoat. The alternative would maintain required performance characteristics, achieve cost objectives, and result in low environmental impacts in relation to the other alternatives.
"September 1996." "EPA/600/R-96/104." "Contract no. 68-C4-0020." "Project officer, Kenneth R. Stone and Johnny Springer, Jr." Bibliography: p. 9-1 - 9-4.