Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog


Main Title Response to Comments Document: Land Disposal Restrictions, Phase 4 Final Rule Promulgating Treatment Standards for Metal Wastes; Mineral Processing Secondary Materials and Bevill Exclusion Issues; Treatment Standards for Hazardous Soils; and Exclusion of Recycled Wood Preserving Wastewaters. Volume 14. Comments Related to Second Supplemental Proposed Rule (May 12, 1997): Treatment Standards for Metal Wastes and Mineral Processing Wastes, Mineral Processing and Bevill Exclusion Issues, and Use of Hazardous Waste as Fill.
CORP Author Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Solid Waste.
Publisher Apr 1998
Year Published 1998
Report Number EPA/530/R-99/020N;
Stock Number PB99-155954
Additional Subjects Waste storage ; Pollution standards ; Hazardous wastes ; Secondary materials industry ; Mineral industry ; Metal industry ; Regulations ; Ground disposal ; Mine wastes ; Remediation ; Land pollution control ; Storage tanks ; Containment ; Alternatives ; Chemical feedstocks ; Waste treatment ; Waste disposal ; Waste management ; Exclusion ; Environmental effects ; Land disposal restrictions ; Public comments ; Responses ; Bevill wastes ; Mineral processing ; RCRA(Resource Conservation and Recovery Act) ; Waste characterizaton ; Regulatory impact analysis
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
NTIS  PB99-155954 Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. 07/26/2022
Collation 176p
The report responds to public comments relevant to land storage of secondary materials, including criteria for high volumes of Bevill-exempt mining and mineral processing wastes, containment units (tanks, containers, buildings, and approved pads), and class of materials outside of RCRA jurisdiction. It examines restriction on using non-Bevill materials as alternative feedstocks and high-risk mining wastes excluded by the Bevill Amendment. It also addresses comments on damage cases and environmental releases, characterization of mineral processing wastes, cost of remediation, risk posed by Bevill mining wastes, and other comments on materials supporting the proposed rule. It discusses comments on the mineral processing impact analysis and proposed criteria for clarifying Bevill status waste.