Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog


OLS Field Name OLS Field Data
Main Title Waste Minimization Opportunity Assessment: A Truck Assembly Plant.
CORP Author Science Applications International Corp., McLean, VA.;Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
Publisher 21 Aug 91
Year Published 1991
Report Number EPA-68-C8-0062; EPA/600/2-91/038;
Stock Number PB91-220392
Additional Subjects Hazardous materials ; Waste management ; Automotive industry ; Trucks ; Waste recycling ; Coatings ; Degreasing ; Solvents ; Dewatering ; Assessments ; Feasibility studies ; Implementation ; Painting ; Procedures ; Waste minimization ; Source reduction ; Chillicothe(Ohio)
Internet Access
Description Access URL
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
NTIS  PB91-220392 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. 11/26/1991
Collation 171p
EPA has developed a systematic approach to identify and implement options to reduce or eliminate hazardous waste. The approach is presented in a report entitled, 'Waste Minimization Opportunity Assessment Manual' (EPA/625/7-88/003). The report describes the application of the waste minimization assessment procedures to a truck assembly facility in Chillicothe, Ohio. This facility volunteered to participate in the project and provided technical support during the study. The relative comparison used in the study indicates that the best options appear to be: (1) reducing paint mix volumes through closer control, (2) minimizing solvent contamination by using a different working container and procedures, and (3) improving transfer efficiency by installing electrostatic painting in the chassis booth. Two options ranked with moderately good scores: (1) dewatering paint solids and recycling the booth waters and chemicals and (2) using ion exchange to recycle the phosphate/E-coat rinse water. The option for bath maintenance on the phosphate/E-coat line ranked last, however still within a reasonable range. One option which recommended procedural and small equipment changes for painting was not evaluated during the feasibility analysis phase, because the costs and savings could not be projected at this time. The associated waste minimization techniques however appear to be technically and economically viable.