Main Title |
Institutional Aspects of Wastewater Management: The Boston Case Study. |
Author |
Hudson, James F. ;
Weinstein, Sarah ;
Deese, Patricia S. ;
Collins, Bert ;
Madsen, Carol ;
|
CORP Author |
Urban Systems Research and Engineering, Inc., Cambridge, MA.;National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.;Council on Environmental Quality, Washington, DC.;Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.;Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC. |
Year Published |
1979 |
Report Number |
EQ7AC015; NSF/PRA/CEQ-7AC015; |
Stock Number |
PB-296 550 |
Additional Subjects |
Sewage treatment ;
Municipalities ;
Water pollution abatement ;
Construction ;
Grants ;
Project planning ;
Financing ;
Political objectives ;
Maintenance ;
Government policies ;
Expenses ;
Standards ;
Citizen participation ;
Local government ;
Waste water ;
Regional planning ;
Design ;
Law enforcement ;
Environmental impacts ;
Massachusetts ;
Case studies ;
Institutional framework ;
Boston(Massachusetts) ;
Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972
|
Holdings |
Library |
Call Number |
Additional Info |
Location |
Last Modified |
Checkout Status |
NTIS |
PB-296 550 |
Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. |
|
07/26/2022 |
|
Collation |
367p |
Abstract |
The objective of the study was to examine recent operation of EPA's Construction Grants Program, using the Boston Metropolitan Area as a case study, with a view toward developing recommendations for possible actions at the national level. This report analyses the planning and institutional aspects of wastewater management in the Boston Metropolitan Area. This report addresses five institutional and political aspects of the water pollution control program: Financing of the local portions of system costs; Policy guidance issued by the Federal government; Coordination among programs operations, management, and maintenance of programs and facilities; and Public participation in the planning processes. There are two types of recommendations: those which increase the considerations of comprehensive planning issues, and those which increase local flexibility in the implementation of facilities and controls. |