Model Clearinghouse Information Storage and Retrieval System
Record Details
AERCOARE-AERMOD Alternative Model Application in Support of Outer Continental Shelf PSD Air Permitting - Ocean Wind
Record No: 23-II-01 Last Update: 09/20/2023
EPA Region: | 2 | Fiscal Year: | 2023 | |
States: | NJ | |||
Record Type: | Action | |||
Pollutants: | PM-2.5,NO2,SO2,CO,NOX,PM-10,PM | Sources: | Unspecified Stationary Source,Drilling Rig,Ship | |
Models: | OCD,AERMOD | Urban/Rural: | Rural | |
Terrain: | Essentially Flat | Regulations: | PSD | |
Guideline: | Both | Database: | Both | |
Oral/Written: | Written | Involvement: | Review and Comment | |
Subjects: | Technical Credibility of Nonguideline Techniques | |||
Comments: | ||||
Issue: Ocean Wind 1, LLC, an affiliate of Orsted Wind Power North America, LLC, is developing an offshore wind energy project (“Ocean Wind Project”) in a federal lease area on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) approximately 24 km (15 miles) off the coast of New Jersey, near Atlantic City. The Ocean Wind Project will include up to 98 wind turbine generators and have an approximate production capacity of 1.1 gigawatts (GW). The Ocean Wind Project is subject to Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permitting and is required to submit an OCS air permit application that includes a dispersion modeling demonstration that air emissions from the Project will not cause or contribute to an exceedance of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) or PSD increments Ocean Wind 1, LLC has requested to use an alternative model, as provided in Section 3.2 of the Guideline on Air Quality Models (40 CFR Part 51, Appendix W), to conduct its PSD air quality modeling analysis of the Ocean Wind Project’s construction and operation and maintenance (O&M) activities. Specifically, Ocean Wind 1, LLC has requested to use the Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Response Experiment (COARE) bulk flux algorithm, as implemented in the AERCOARE meteorological data preprocessor program, to prepare meteorological data for use in the American Meteorological Society/ Environmental Protection Agency Regulatory Model (AERMOD) dispersion program in lieu of the preferred Offshore and Coastal Dispersion (OCD) model to assess ambient impacts in a marine environment EPA Region 2 has conducted a thorough review of Ocean Wind 1, LLCs request and has found the proposed application of the alternative model to be satisfactory and addresses the requirements of the Guideline, Section 3.2.2(b), Condition (3), including the subsequent five elements contained in Section 3.2.2(e). As such, pursuant to the Guideline, Sections 3.0(b) and 3.2.2(a), Region 2 currently intends to approve the use of proposed coupled AERCOARE-AERMOD alternative model approach for the Ocean Wind Project air permit application. C/H Response: The Model Clearinghouse concurs with EPA Region 2’s proposed approval of a coupled AERCOARE-AERMOD alternative modeling approach for the air quality modeling analysis required in the Ocean Wind Project based on the alternative model request package provided by Ocean Wind 1, LLC and the review documentation in the alternative model concurrence request memorandum provided by EPA Region 2. The Model Clearinghouse encourages EPA Region 2 to respond to Ocean Wind 1, LLC and to the docket for federal permitting actions related to the Ocean Wind Project with a letter of alternative model approval, as appropriate. The information associated with the EPA Region 2 alternative model approval and the Model Clearinghouse concurrence should be available for comment during the appropriate public comment period(s). Given the possible importance of platform downwash and shoreline fumigation, the Model Clearinghouse continues to recommend caution and careful review before additional alternative model considerations of the coupled AERCOARE-AERMOD model methodology in other projects. This case-specific Model Clearinghouse concurrence does not constitute a generic approval of a coupled AERCOARE-AERMOD approach for other applications elsewhere. However, the scope of the technical assessment submitted here and with similar AERCOARE-AERMOD alternative model requests continue to provide a good basis for such considerations. |
||||
Memoranda: | ||||
Memo: Model Clearinghouse review of an alternative model application of AERCOARE in conjunction with AERMOD in Support of Outer Continental Shelf PSD air permitting of the Ocean Wind Project Dated: September 20, 2023 From: George Bridgers, Model Clearinghouse Director Air Quality Modeling Group, Air Quality Assessment Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards To: Brian Marmo, Regional Air Quality Modeler Permitting Section, Air Programs Branch, Air and Radiation Division EPA Region 2, New York, New York Thru: Richard Ruvo, Director Air and Radiation Division EPA Region 2, New York, New York Memo: Concurrence Request for Approval of Alternative Model AERCOARE in Conjunction with AERMOD, in Support of Outer Continental Shelf PSD air permitting of the Ocean Wind 1 Offshore Wind Power Project Dated: August 29, 2023 From: Brian Marmo, Regional Air Quality Modeler Permitting Section, Air Programs Branch, Air and Radiation Division EPA Region 2, New York, New York Thru: Richard Ruvo, Director Air and Radiation Division EPA Region 2, New York, New York To: George Bridgers, Director of Model Clearinghouse Air Quality Modeling Group, Air Quality Assessment Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards |