Model Clearinghouse Information Storage and Retrieval System
Record Details
AERCOARE-AERMOD Alternative Model Application in Support of Outer Continental Shelf PSD Air Permitting - Mayflower Wind
Record No: 22-I-03 Last Update: 12/15/2022
EPA Region: | 1 | Fiscal Year: | 2022 | |
States: | MA | |||
Record Type: | Action | |||
Pollutants: | PM-2.5,NO2,SO2,CO,NOX,O3,PM-10 | Sources: | Unspecified Stationary Source,Drilling Rig,Ship | |
Models: | OCD,AERMOD | Urban/Rural: | Rural | |
Terrain: | Essentially Flat | Regulations: | PSD | |
Guideline: | Guideline | Database: | Both | |
Oral/Written: | Written | Involvement: | Review and Comment | |
Subjects: | Technical Credibility of Nonguideline Techniques | |||
Comments: | ||||
Issue: Mayflower Wind, LLC (Mayflower Wind) has proposed the construction of an offshore wind renewable energy generation project on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) off the southern coast of Massachusetts (Lease Area OCS-A 0521). The Mayflower Wind project triggers the requirements for Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) review as a major source with anticipated significant emissions of sulfur doxide (SO2), carbon monoxide (CO), oxides of nitrogen (NOX), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), particulate matter (PM) with diameter 10 microns or less (PM10), PM with diameter 2.5 microns or less (PM2.5), and Greenhouse Gases (GHG). As a result, air quality modeling will be conducted for SO2, CO, NO2, O3, PM10, and PM2.5 to demonstrate compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and appropriate PSD Increments. Additionally, the Mayflower Wind project will trigger Nonattainment New Source Review (NNSR) for the O3 precursors NOX and VOCs. Mayflower Wind has requested to use an alternative model, as provided in Section 3.2 of the Guideline on Air Quality Models (40 CFR Part 51, Appendix W), to conduct its PSD air quality modeling analysis. Specifically, Mayflower has requested to use the Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Response Experiment (COARE) bulk flux algorithm, as implemented in the AERCOARE meteorological data preprocessor program, to prepare meteorological data for use in the American Meteorological Society/Environmental Protection Agency Regulatory Model (AERMOD) dispersion program over the preferred Offshore and Coastal Dispersion (OCD) model to assess ambient impacts in a marine environment. EPA Region 1 has conducted a thorough review of the Mayflower Wind request and has found the proposed application of the alternative model is satisfactory and addresses the requirements of the Guideline, Section 3.2.2(b), Condition (3) and the subsequent five elements contained in Section 3.2.2(e). As such, pursuant to Sections 3.0(b) and 3.2.2(a), EPA Region 1 currently intends to approve the use of AERCOARE-AERMOD as an acceptable alternative model for the Mayflower Wind project. C/H Response: The Model Clearinghouse concurs with EPA Region 1’s proposed approval of a coupled AERCOARE-AERMOD alternative modeling approach for the air quality modeling analysis required in the Mayflower Wind project based the alternative model justification package provided by Mayflower Wind, LLC and the review documentation in the alternative model concurrence request memorandum provided by EPA Region 1. The Model Clearinghouse encourages EPA Region 1 to respond to Mayflower Wind, LLC and to the docket for federal permitting actions related to the Mayflower Wind project with a letter of alternative model approval, as appropriate. The information associated with the EPA Region 1 alternative model approval and the Model Clearinghouse concurrence should be available for comment during the appropriate public comment period(s). Given the possible importance of platform downwash and shoreline fumigation, the Model Clearinghouse continues to recommend caution and careful review before additional alternative model considerations of the coupled AERCOARE-AERMOD model methodology in other projects. This case- specific Model Clearinghouse concurrence does not constitute a generic approval of a coupled AERCOARE-AERMOD approach for other applications elsewhere. However, the scope of the technical assessment submitted here and with similar AERCOARE-AERMOD alternative model requests continue to provide a good basis for such considerations. |
||||
Memoranda: | ||||
Memo: Model Clearinghouse review of an alternative model application of Alternative Model AERCOARE in Conjunction with AERMOD in Support of Outer Continental Shelf PSD air permitting of the Mayflower Wind Project Dated: December 13, 2022 From: George Bridgers, Model Clearinghouse Director Air Quality Modeling Group, Air Quality Assessment Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards To: Patrick Bird, Manager Air Permits, Toxics, and Indoor Programs Branch, Air and Radiation Division EPA Region 1, Boston, Massachusetts Lynne Hamjian, Director Air and Radiation Division EPA Region 1, Boston, Massachusetts Memo: Concurrence Request for Approval of Alternative Model AERCOARE in Conjunction with AERMOD, in Support of Outer Continental Shelf PSD air permitting of the Mayflower Wind Project Dated: November 18, 2022 From: Patrick Bird, Manager Air Permits, Toxics, and Indoor Programs Branch, Air and Radiation Division EPA Region 1, Boston, Massachusetts Thru: Lynne Hamjian, Director Air and Radiation Division EPA Region 1, Boston, Massachusetts To: George Bridgers, Director of Model Clearinghouse Air Quality Modeling Group, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Memo: Mayflower Wind Energy – Request for use of COARE Bulk Flux Algorithm to Generate Hourly Meteorological Data for use with AERMOD Dated: October 17, 2022 |