Model Clearinghouse Information Storage and Retrieval System
Record Details
Use of beta ARM2 Technique as an Alternative Model
Record No: 16-VI-02 Last Update: 08/01/2016
EPA Region: | 6 | Fiscal Year: | 2016 | |
States: | LA | |||
Record Type: | Action | |||
Pollutants: | NO2 | Sources: | Generic to Any Stationary Source | |
Models: | AERMOD | Urban/Rural: | Both Urban & Rural | |
Terrain: | Both High & Low | Regulations: | PSD | |
Guideline: | Guideline | Database: | Both | |
Oral/Written: | Written | Involvement: | Review and Comment | |
Subjects: | Technical Credibility of Nonguideline Techniques | |||
Comments: | ||||
Issue: Region VI is seeking concurrence from the Model Clearinghouse for the approval of an alternative modeling demonstration for the use of the beta Ambient Ratio Method 2 (ARM2) Tier 2 NO2 modeling technique. The ARM2 technique will be applied in an compliance demonstration for a PSD permit at the Sundrop Fuels Rapides Station Fuels Facility in Boyce, Louisiana. C/H Response: The Model Clearinghouse concurs with Region VI's position that ARM2 is an appropriate technique for modeling NO2 impacts from the Sundrop Fuels Rapides Station Fuels Facility project. We agree that the facility meets the requirements for the usage of ARM2 set forth in the September 30, 2014 EPA clarification memorandum. The ARM2 technique can be used to model a variety of sources, provided that they meet certain minimum criteria to insure that the model results are appropriately conservative relative to a more refined Tier 3 technique (i.e., the Ozone Limiting Method, or OLM, and the Plume Volume Molar Ratio Method, or PVMRM). As noted in your memorandum, a review of the EPA’s NO2/NOX ISR Database was conducted to determine representative ISR from reported similar sources, where available. While representative ISR information was not available for all on-site sources, information was identified for most of the NOX sources. The average ratios of the identified representative ISRs were all less than 0.2 and maximum values less than 0.25, with the exception of the ISRs for natural gas fired reciprocating IC engine sources group. Based on the ISR information available and the types of on-site emission sources, we believe the minimum ambient NO2/NOX ratio of 0.50 is appropriately conservative for this proposed Sundrop Fuels facility project. |
||||
Memoranda: | ||||
Memo: Model Clearinghouse Review of the Use of the Ambient Ratio Method 2 (ARM2) Default AERMOD Option for the Sundrop Fuels Rapides Station Fuels Facility NO2 Ambient Impact Analysis Dated: August 1, 2016 From: George Bridgers, Model Clearinghouse Director Air Quality Modeling Group, EPA To: Jeffrey Robinson, Chief Air Permits Section, Region 6, EPA Ashley Mohr, Environmental Scientist Air Permits Section, Region 6, EPA Memo: Concurrence Request - Approval of Ambient Ratio Method 2 (ARM2) Default AERMOD Option for the Sundrop Fuels Louisiana LLC - Rapides Station Fuels Facility NO2 Ambient Impact Analysis Dated: August 1, 2016 From: Jeffrey Robinson, Chief Air Permits Section, Region 6, EPA To: George Bridgers, Director of Model Clearinghouse Air Quality Modeling Group, EPA |