Grantee Research Project Results
Journal Publications Details for Grant Number R840252
Assessing biosolid treatment processes on pollutant environmental fate and plant uptake following land application
RFA:
National Priorities: Evaluation of Pollutants in Biosolids (2020)
Other Views
- All
Publications - Selected
Publication Types - Journal
Articles - Publications Submitted
After Final Report - Redisplay this page with
Reference Title, Journal, and Author Columns - Display this Page
in RIS Format
| Reference Type | Citation | Progress Report Year | Document Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Journal Article | Carignan C. Invited Perspective: Examining Chemicals in Food as a Priority for Toxicity Testing. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES 2023;131(3):031304 |
R840252 (2022) |
|
| Journal Article | Oza S, Bell K, Xu Z, Wang Y, Wells M, Norton JJ, Winchell L, Huang Q, LI H. Surveillance of PFAS in sludge and biosolids at 12 water resource recovery facilities. Journal of Environmental Quality 2024. |
R840252 (2023) R840252 (2024) |
|
| Journal Article | Li Y, Sallach JB, Zhang W, Boyd SA, Li H. Characterization of plant accumulation of pharmaceuticals from soils with their concentration in soil pore water. Environmental Science & Technology 2022; 56(13):9346-55. |
R840252 (2022) |
|
| Journal Article | Wang W, Rhodes G, Zhang W, Yu X, Teppen BJ, Li H. Implication of cation-bridging interaction contribution to sorption of perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids by soils. Chemosphere 2022; 290:133224. |
R840252 (2022) |
|
| Journal Article | Preisendanz HE, Li H, Mashtare M, Mina O. PFAS in Agroecosystems:Sources, Impacts, and Opportunities for Mitigating Risks to Human and Ecosystem Health. Journal of Environmental Quality. 2025;54:1-5. |
R840252 (2024) |
|
The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.