Grantee Research Project Results
New Methods in Environmental Remediation and Life Cycle Assessment
EPA Grant Number: R829423E01Title: New Methods in Environmental Remediation and Life Cycle Assessment
Investigators: Focht, Will , Regens, James L. , Nairn, Robert W. , Settle, Chad , Anex, Rob
Institution: University of Oklahoma , Oklahoma State University , University of Tulsa
Current Institution: Oklahoma State University , University of Oklahoma , University of Tulsa
EPA Project Officer: Chung, Serena
Project Period: July 15, 2002 through July 14, 2004
Project Amount: $220,001
RFA: EPSCoR (Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research) (2001) RFA Text | Recipients Lists
Research Category: EPSCoR (The Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research)
Objective:
The objective of this research project is to develop and demonstrate an enhanced life cycle assessment (ELCA) methodology that combines LCA inventory and impact analyses, human health risk assessment, and dynamic cost-benefit analysis within a stakeholder-based analytic-deliberative process. The ELCA framework will be demonstrated through application to the treatment of metal-rich waters through enhanced wetland technologies at a site near the Tar Creek Superfund in northeast Oklahoma.
Publications and Presentations:
Publications have been submitted on this project: View all 10 publications for this projectJournal Articles:
Journal Articles have been submitted on this project: View all 2 journal articles for this projectSupplemental Keywords:
exposure, risk assessment, water, chemical transport, passive treatment, modeling, bioremediation, economic analysis, stakeholder participation, benefit transfer, engineered wetlands, water, ecological effects, metals, restoration, remediation, life cycle analysis, environmental chemistry, biology, ecology, hydrology, geology, analytical, mining, Oklahoma, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, EPA Region 6, Tar Creek., Health, Scientific Discipline, ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, Waste, Ecology, Remediation, Health Risk Assessment, Risk Assessments, Risk Assessment, aquatic ecosystem, decision making process, const benefit analysis, human healthe risk assessment, wetland sediment, LCA inventory, decisions analysis, remediation technologies, metal extraction, human exposure, water quality, life cycle assessment, cost benefit analysis, water management options, stakeholders, water treatment, exposure assessment, metal remediation, stakeholder feedback, human health riskProgress and Final Reports:
The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.