Grantee Research Project Results
Final Report: Reducing Uncertainty in Estimating Toxaphene Loading to the Great Lakes
EPA Grant Number: R825246Title: Reducing Uncertainty in Estimating Toxaphene Loading to the Great Lakes
Investigators: Swackhamer, Deborah L. , Hites, Ronald A.
Institution: University of Minnesota , Indiana University - Bloomington
EPA Project Officer: Chung, Serena
Project Period: November 15, 1996 through November 14, 1999
Project Amount: $296,996
RFA: Air Quality (1996) RFA Text | Recipients Lists
Research Category: Air Quality and Air Toxics , Air
Objective:
There were three objectives for this research project. These were:
Objective 1. Sediment and water were sampled from Lakes Michigan and Superior (see Figure 1) to determine toxaphene concentrations and estimate fluxes between media. Data for t-chlordane, c-chlordane, t-nonachlor, and c-nonachlor also were included. Although previously established methods were used for sample collection, several new approaches were utilized in clean-up and analytical quantitation, thereby requiring extensive method optimization and validation. In addition to providing a descriptive data set for the lakes, this information forms the basis for future predictions of toxaphene fate using environmental models.
Objective 2. The relative importance of atmospheric versus non-atmospheric loadings of toxaphene to northern Lake Michigan was estimated using sediment core analysis from Green Bay along with air and water concentrations. These data, taken with existing Lake Michigan data then were used to validate a mass balance model for Lake Michigan.
Past results (Pearson 1996; Pearson, Swackhamer, et al., 1997), showed that levels of toxaphene in Lake Michigan sediments were higher in the northern basin compared to the southern basin. Pearson, Swackhamer, et al., suggest that, beginning in the mid-1980s, a source of 100-200 kg/yr of total toxaphene may have resulted from non-atmospheric loading. Because sediments can provide a reliable historical profile of deposition, numerous cores were taken in Green Bay. One was taken in the northern basin of the open lake for this study. This helped to reduce uncertainty in toxaphene inventories in sediments and provided an evaluation of tributary inputs by sampling depositional zones that capture tributary outflow. Sediment cores were collected from near the mouth of the Fox River north to the top of Green Bay and in the northern part of Lake Michigan. Sediment cores are more useful than water measurements for this purpose because they provide a current as well as past record of any significant toxaphene inputs.
Objective 3. Using the STELLA model, a multilevel framework that allows the user to construct dynamic multivariate mass balance models tailored to a specific system, dynamic mass balance models for toxaphene in both Lake Superior and Lake Michigan (Swackhamer, Schottler, et al., 1999) was refined and used to generate future predictions of water and sediment concentration. (The STELLA model allows for the specification of the type and number of input data, the equations used for the input and loss processes to and from the lake, and the time increment.) The model outcomes were compared to measured results and previous modeling efforts for reasonableness. The final model and the data generated from it contributed to testing the objectives. In addition, the model output was used to estimate the half-life of toxaphene in Lake Michigan and Lake Superior and provided insight into the time required for concentrations to decline to levels consistent with those utilized in establishing fish consumption advisories.
Summary/Accomplishments (Outputs/Outcomes):
The current research examined toxaphene in Lake Superior and Lake Michigan to determine spatial and temporal trends in concentration, homolog distribution, water/particle partitioning (Kp), fluxes between media, and the potential for the existence of significant non-atmospheric sources. There were no clear spatial trends in either lake (except Green Bay) and toxaphene net air/water flux showed consistent volatilization during all times tested.
In general, volatilization decreased epilimnetic concentrations during stratified conditions, and lake-wide mixing during overturn increased surface concentrations. The mean dissolved toxaphene concentration in Green Bay was significantly lower than in the open lake during isothermal conditions, due to minimal hypolimnetic recharge. Average surficial dissolved toxaphene concentrations in Lake Superior averaged 0.91 ng/L in 1997, and 0.73 ng/L in 1998. Dissolved toxaphene concentrations for Lake Michigan averaged 0.40 ng/L in 1997, and 0.35 ng/L in 1998.
Toxaphene homolog distributions showed significant differences between dissolved and particulate phases in water and sediments. The homolog distribution in Lake Michigan water was enhanced in lower chlorinated homologs compared to Lake Superior. Toxaphene Kp varied with season, and showed varying dependence on particulate organic carbon (POC) (no correlation in Lake Superior; seasonal correlation in Lake Michigan). The overall average log Kp value for Lake Superior was 4.93 and for Lake Michigan was 4.49. Sediment analysis in Lake Michigan demonstrated that Green Bay is not a likely significant source of toxaphene to the northern basin of the lake. However, there were elevated concentrations and inventories of all compounds studied at the southern end of Green Bay, reflecting likely point-source inputs. Concentration trends from a dynamic mass balance model were consistent with measured values. Factors such as model results, a lack of spatial differences in dissolved and sediment concentration, seasonal concentration fluctuations, and a homolog fingerprint similar to air supported the assertion that no significant non-atmospheric toxaphene sources in Lake Superior existed. Model results also were used to estimate toxaphene half-lives of 19.5 years for Lake Superior and 9.5 years for Lake Michigan, and were the basis for evaluating fish consumption advisory trends.
Toxaphene has been identified in several locations in the Duluth/Superior harbor at the western edge of Lake Superior at concentrations up to 140 ng/g (Schubauer-Berigan and Crane, 1997). Swackhamer, et al. (1998), summarized toxaphene data for the lake, reporting dissolved water concentrations of 1.12 ng/L for Lake Superior, 0.38 ng/L for Lake Michigan, and a water particulate concentration of 9.4 ng/g for Lake Michigan. They also reported that sediments had similar concentrations among the lakes (around 15 ng/g) and for filtered water particulates (around 9 ng/g), but had different homolog compositions among the lakes (see Table 1). The bioaccumulation factor (BAF) is determined by dividing the level in the organism by the level found dissolved in water, normalized to lipid (zooplankton and fish) or organic carbon (OC; phytoplankton).
| Concentration, ng/g dw | Concentration, ng/g lipid or OC | mean normalized log BAF | |
| Phytoplankton | 51.3 ± 30.4 | 295 ± 197 | 5.82 ± 0.24 |
| Zooplankton | 243 ± 139 | 843 ± 566 | 6.53 ±0.24 |
| Mysis | 92.4 ± 32.8 | 843 ± 566 | 6.29 ± 0.24 |
| Bythotrephes | 162 ± 57.2 | 1530 ± 918 | 6.70 ± 0.33 |
| Diaporeia | 411 ± 57.2 | 3710 ± 3020 | N/A |
| Sculpin | 225 ± 101 | 4300 ± 1934 | 6.58 ± 0.34 |
| Lake trout | 2370 ± 1450 | 10300 ± 3920 | 6.96 ± 0.42 |
| N/A = not applicable; n.d. = not determined. | |||
Existing studies of toxaphene in the Great Lakes include levels in surface sediments and water (Pearson 1996; Pearson, Swackhamer, et al., 1997). Current concentrations in sediments ranged from a low of 2.8 ng/g in a nearshore core of Lake Superior to a high of 45 ng/g in a core taken from northern Lake Michigan. Except for cores from northern Lake Michigan, the current toxaphene levels in sediment cores from depositional zones of the Great Lakes were 15 + 4 ng/g, which was similar to the current concentration in one of the control lakes. Current accumulations ranged from 0.065 ng/cm2 yr in a control lake (e.g., only long-range atmospheric input) to 1.0 ng/cm2 yr in one of the northern Lake Michigan cores. Sediment inventories ranged from 2.8 - 12 ng/cm2 yr in a control lake (e.g., only long-range atmospheric input) to 1.0 ng/cm2 yr. The homolog compositions of the sediment cores changed with depth consistent with degradation of toxaphene. However, the degradation rates were shown to be slow, with a half-life of about 50 years. One exception to the weathering of toxaphene in sediment was in Lake Superior, where two adjacent cores showed homolog compositions similar to parent toxaphene.
Comparison of the accumulations and concentrations in the Great Lake cores to those in the control lakes indicated that the atmosphere is the dominant source of toxaphene to the Great Lakes. One of those exceptions was northern Lake Michigan, which was estimated to be receiving about 30 percent-50 percent of its current inputs from non-atmospheric sources (Pearson 1996).
Figure 1. Sample Locations
There were few data outliers or missing data for Lake Superior. Samples were not collected in the spring of 1998 at Station 22/1dd due to scheduling limitations. The filters used to determine the fraction organic carbon for the particulate phase for Station 19 in spring 1998 yielded a higher carbon mass per liter than total particulate mass per liter. To compensate for this, the average concentration of particulate organic carbon for the two stations geographically bounding Station 19 was inserted, and a fraction of the organic carbon value was estimated. All other data related to Lake Superior met the QA/QC requirements. Variability was examined using the General Linear Model (GLM).
The most significant factors relating to variability in toxaphene concentration are associated with temporal differences and covariates that tend to change with time (e.g., water temperature). These factors, in turn, are highly correlated with changing air concentrations as a result of changing air mass sources. This indicates that toxaphene is not at a constant concentration over time, and that temporal characterization of a sample is crucial to understanding the significance of a given observation with respect to the lake ecosystem. There also are spatial differences with respect to the particulate phase that result from changing conditions within the lake.
Roughly 97 percent of the mass of total toxaphene in Lake Superior water was present in the dissolved phase. The majority of toxaphene in Lake Superior entered the lake in the dissolved phase because the main source of loading is from air/water transfer. The concentration remains high in the dissolved phase due to the relatively low water/particle partition coefficient. In addition, there are limited removal mechanisms, such as low sedimentation rate and minimal tributary outflow.
The optimal set of parameters for the GLM have an overall R2 value of 0.765. When the covariates water temperature or air temperature are included in the model, both factors were significant, but produced a lower R2 value (0.74 and 0.72, respectively). Therefore, while the physical parameters describing temperature did contribute to determining dissolved toxaphene concentration, the most significant factors involved temporal characteristics of the samples. There is no significant contribution from the factor station, indicating that the lake is mixed well horizontally. This is consistent with the lack of a current, significant point source of toxaphene to the water column and reinforced the assertion that atmospheric transport is the main source to the lake. There is a significant difference (p = 0.001) of dissolved total toxaphene between years, with 1998 being lower in average concentration.
To investigate potential trends within a specific year, individual cruises are compared. Many significant differences are found both between years and individual cruises. Differences between individual cruises were defined using a separate GLM model with cruise number as the only factor. Because the sequential cruise number incorporates both year and season, this model is equivalent to those using season, year, and season x year and is as robust (cruise # p = <0.001; model R2 = 0.765). The most significant differences are noted between cruises during isothermal conditions (e.g., cruises 1, 4, and 5) and those during stratified conditions (cruises 2, 3, 6, 7, and 8). There were lower concentrations observed during stratified conditions because of losses from the epilimnion by volatilization. There is a gradual decline in concentration over time during stratified conditions in both years. When the lake vertically mixes in the fall, hypolimnetic water containing higher concentrations of toxaphene mixes with the epilimnetic water, raising concentration at the surface. Recharge of the surface with hypolimnetic toxaphene was likely responsible for the increase in dissolved toxaphene between cruises 2 and 3. It also explained why cruise 3 was more consistent with the isothermal cruises rather than the stratified cruises. The absence of major upwelling events to recharge the surface toxaphene caused a decline in dissolved concentration over time in 1998. The sustained lower concentration in the October 1998 sample was the result of continued stratified conditions late in the season. The spring values for each year are statistically similar, even though the concentration trends in each year are different. This is because the lake was mixed well vertically during spring turnover. There is a slight decline from the spring 1997 value (1.01 ng/L) to the 1998 spring value (0.94 ng/L), which reflects the net mass lost from the system between 1997 and 1998.
The dissolved phase concentration for total toxaphene correlates with measured air, water temperature, and the temperature of the air/water interface (Schwab, Leshkevich, et al., 1999). The concentration of dissolved toxaphene decreased with increasing interface temperature. This is because the Henry's Law (H) constant increases with increasing temperature, thereby enhancing flux from water to air, and depleting the dissolved water phase in the upper zone of the lake. The interface temperature is lowest during the highest measured concentration, reflecting isothermal conditions and the mixing of hypolimnetic toxaphene to the surface. The upward trend in 1997 was a result of breaks in the stratification that occurred over summer, while the October sample was taken after the fall overturn. In 1998, the consistent downward trend reflected the stratified conditions throughout the summer, while the October sample was taken before the fall overturn.
The concentration values presented here for total dissolved toxaphene are consistent with previous reports from Lake Superior (Pearson, Swackhamer, et al., 1997; Swackhamer, Pearson, et al., 1998) and show that the levels are gradually declining with time. The average dissolved phase concentration in 1996 was 1.12 ng/L (Swackhamer, Pearson, et al., 1998), which is about 17 percent higher than the observed value for 1997 from this study. The first order overall loss rate constant (k) for total toxaphene may be calculated using the average concentration; A is the 1996 concentration; and k is the slope. This yields a value of k of -0.21yr-1 with an R2 of 0.999. This yields a half-life of 4.73 years for dissolved toxaphene in Lake Superior (see Figure 2).
Figure 2. Average Dissolved Total Toxaphene (Diss tox) by Individual Cruise in ng/L.
Bars represent 95 percent confidence intervals. N = 7 for April/May, 1997, August/September 1997 and 1998; N = 2 for June/July 1997, and October 1997 and 1998; N = 3 for Jun/Jul 1998. All June/July, August/September, and October 1998 cruises are in stratified conditions; others are isothermal. Solid line represents the monthly average air/water interface temperature as determined from satellite data (Schwab, Leshkevich et al., 1999).
There is no significant difference between stations for the dissolved toxaphene, indicating that the toxaphene identified in the Duluth harbor (Schubauer-Berigan and Crane, 1997) does not have a significant influence on the concentration of dissolved toxaphene in the western arm of the lake. Also, the additional particulate load from the south shore of the western arm (Scholz, 1985) did not appear to affect the dissolved concentration, and indicated no significant input from other tributaries or erosion.
When examining toxaphene homolog concentration trends in the dissolved phase, the same factors were significant in explaining variability as those found for total toxaphene. The lower chlorinated homologs (6-, 7-, and 8-Cl) accounted for greater than 90 percent of the total dissolved toxaphene mass. This is consistent with an atmospheric deposition source. In general, the predominance of the lower chlorinated homologs reflects their higher solubility and vapor pressure, which would allow them to preferentially pass the air/water boundary. The presence of lower chlorinated homologs also supports atmospheric deposition, because those compounds are found most commonly in the air (Barrie, Bidleman, et al., 1993).
When the general nature of the particles (suspended particulate matter [SPM], POC) in the Lake Superior water column is examined, several factors are found to be significant. The R2 for the POC model is 1.0, while the R2 for the SPM model is 0.998. Homogenous groups are determined to consist of Stations 22, WA, and 19 (the western stations), and Stations 17, 12, 8, and 1 (the eastern stations). The SPM tends to be higher and the POC lower in the western arm, which is consistent with the higher erosional loading of inorganic clay particles to the western arm (Scholz, 1985).
The POC content varies significantly with the total amount of particulates present. As the amount of particles decreases, the fraction of organic carbon increases. The slope of the linear regression line doubles (R2 = 0.42; slope = -1.116) when the stations from the western arm (22, WA, and 19) are removed (see Figure 3). This may be because the biologically oriented particles (e.g., relatively high in OC) remain fairly constant throughout the lake, while the input of inorganic particulates increased on the western portion of the lake. This is consistent with the western arm of Lake Superior; it constitutes only 5 percent of the lake surface area, but receives up to 60 percent of the sediment load. The main source of these particles is erosion of red clay from the southern shore between Duluth and the Apostle Islands (Scholz, 1985).
Figure 3. Regression of SPM versus POC for Lake Superior. Equation is the computer-generated best-fit linear regression trend line. Data are from all cruises and all stations. N = 35.
Toxaphene concentration in the particulate phase in Lake Superior showed much greater variability over both time and space than the dissolved phase as shown by the lower significance for the term season and the presence of the term station in the GLM model for particulates. The difference exists most likely because the dissolved phase adjusts to changes in ambient air concentration faster than the particulate concentration adjusts to changes in water concentration. This is reflected in the presence of significant differences at the year/time scale, in addition to the season/time scale. The significant statistic differences between individual cruises for the particulate phase also are much less frequent and less significant than those observed for the dissolved phase. This is either because of the higher variability in the individual results or because of the most significant input/loss pathway, which has the most influence on the dissolved pathway. The particulate concentration for 1997 is significantly (p = 0.005) higher than that for 1998. This is consistent with the trend observed for the dissolved phase.
In contrast to the dissolved phase, however, the particulate concentration did significantly vary with location. Station 1 (ave + 95 percent CI = 106 ng/g + 29 g/g), located in the easternmost portion of the lake, is significantly (p = 0.022) higher than Station 22 (ave + 95 percent CI = 43 ng/g + 1 ng/g), which is located in the westernmost portion. This is consistent with the higher sediment load in the western portion of the lake, which tends to dilute the toxaphene concentration on a per gram basis.
Analysis of variability in particulate phase toxaphene homolog concentration reveals similar trends for the 7 and 8 chlorinated homologs as those seen in the total toxaphene particulate phase. For both total and individual homologs, location plays a role in explaining variability in particulate concentration for both total and individual homologs. The amount of variability explained by these models varied greatly, ranging from a low of 17 percent up to a relatively high 68 percent. The differences between homologs were a result of varying chemical properties and their effect on behavior in the particulate phase. The 6-Cl homolog had the highest solubility, and therefore, is bound least tightly to the particle. Although there is a relatively high proportion of 6-Cl homolog in the air and dissolved phase, it is not as readily partitioned into the particle phase as the lower solubility homologs. The 7 and 8-Cl homologs closely mirrored the response of total toxaphene in the particulate phase due to their lower solubility (and therefore greater affinity for the particles) and high prevalence in both air and dissolved water phase. The highest chlorinated homologs showed poor correlation and significance because of their low concentration and inherent greater variability associated with quantifying compounds near the limit of detection.
As with the dissolved phase, concentrations of particulates in 1997 were consistently higher than those of 1998. Differences across stations for the 7 and 8-Cl generally followed the same pattern as total toxaphene, with the western locations having a slightly lower concentration than those in the eastern portion of the lake. Differences across seasons also mirrored the total toxaphene response, with the concentration gradually decreasing over the course of the sample season, and then increasing back to near an initial level in spring. This is consistent with the particulate concentration; it is highly dependant on the dissolved concentration.
When the total toxaphene particulate concentration is plotted against the POC, no correlation (p = 0.326) is observed. This indicates that the toxaphene has not attained steady state conditions with respect to the carbon in the particles, because the partitioning theory suggests that the concentration of a hydrophobic compound on a particle should correlate with the amount of organic carbon in the particles (Karickhoff, Brown, et al., 1979). The lack of correlation supports the inference that the dissolved and particulate concentrations changed at different rates and are not at equilibrium with respect to each other.
When analyzing the homolog distribution in the dissolved phase, neither a factor or covariate was found to be significant. Therefore, the variability in these homologs could not be explained by the factors utilized in this study. The final models for the 7-Cl, 8-Cl, and 9-Cl homologs included the single factor water temperature (p < 0.001; R2 = 0.491 for 7-Cl and 0.542 for 8-Cl homologs) or the single factor cruise number (p = 0.001; R2 = 0.578). The model for the 9-Cl homologs contained the single factor cruise number (p = 0.012, R2 = 0.468). These individual factors give similar results because water temperature and cruise number were highly (p < 0.001) correlated, with lower temperatures in earlier seasons.
When analyzing dissolved toxaphene homolog distribution patterns as a function of water temperature, the 7-Cl homologs increased (p = <0.001), while the 8-Cl homologs decreased (p = <0.001) with increased water temperature. The 9-Cl homologs also showed a negative trend with increasing water temperature, but with a lower significance (slope p = 0.09). The linear regression lines for the 7-Cl and 8-Cl homologs are nearly exact opposites (slopes of 0.0038 and -0.0039). The slope of the 6-Cl homolog is not significantly different from 0 (p = 0.184). Therefore, the mass lost from the 8-Cl homologs is offset by an increase in 7-Cl homolog as temperature increased.
This preferential enhancement of the lower chlorinated homolog with increasing water/air temperature most likely occurs because the ambient air concentration increases simultaneously with temperature. Because air has a higher percentage of lower chlorinated homologs, this increase in air concentration acts to decrease the flux of the lower chlorinated homologs out of the water. This causes the 8-Cl homolog to offgass faster than the 7-Cl homolog as temperature increases, resulting in a lower relative percentage being present. The 7-Cl homolog does not actually inflate with increasing temperatures; rather, it decreases less quickly, appearing to increase relative to the other components. Because the lake was consistently offgassing, the increase in 7-Cl homologs was not the result of increased flux from air to water with higher temperatures.
For particulate toxaphene homolog distribution, the trend is similar to the dissolved phase, with the lower chlorinated homolog (6-Cl) increasing over the course of a year (p = 0.032), and the higher chlorinated homolog (8-Cl) decreasing over the same period (p = 0.024). Significant trends were not observed for the 7-Cl, 9-Cl, or 10-Cl homologs. Therefore, it appears that the mass lost from the 8-Cl is replaced by the 6-Cl homolog. Similar plots (with slightly higher significance) are obtained when homolog distribution is plotted against air temperature. The decline in significance is attributed to the particles that are directly influenced by the dissolved concentration and the water temperature, and only indirectly by the air trends. In addition, there is much more scatter in the data (e.g., lower R2 values for the linear regression lines). This scatter is from increased variability in the particulate concentration, due to a lack of steady state conditions. The negative slope for the 8-Cl homolog distribution with temperature is nearly identical to the value for the dissolved phase, indicating that loss from the dissolved phase drives loss from the particulate phase. Sedimentation also may reduce higher chlorinated homologs in the water column by preferentially removing more hydrophobic fractions.
Examination of the average toxaphene homolog distributions for dissolved, particulate, and sediment revealed that each media and homolog is different from each other. A higher percentage in the lower chlorine homologs (e.g., 6 and 7) generally represents more weathered material (Muir and de Boer, 1993; Fingerling, Hertkorn, et al., 1996). These data could be the result of a higher magnitude of transfer of more volatile components (e.g., the lower chlorinated compounds (Rice, 1993)) across the air/water interface, or the recycling of higher chlorinated homologs in the sediments as the carbon is broken down. The most likely explanation involves a combination of volatilization, which is the most significant transfer pathway for toxaphene in the lake. Recycling has been shown to occur for other hydrophobic organic compounds in the lake (Baker, Eisenreich, et al., 1991; Pearson, 1996; Hietela, 1999). The relatively small confidence intervals on each of the homolog values indicate that the distribution was relatively stable within a given media. The homolog distributions established for Lake Superior by this study are consistent with values reported previously for the Great Lakes (Swackhamer, Pearson, et al., 1998).
Partition coefficients for toxaphene were calculated using the dissolved concentration, or the particulate concentration (in ng/g). Partitioning of an organic compound such as toxaphene between the dissolved and particulate phases in water, can be influenced by the lipophilicity and solubility of the compound and the physical characteristics of the particles (Manahan, 1994). The factors found to be significant in explaining variability in total toxaphene log Kp are station (p = 0.063) and cruise (p = 0.064), producing an R2 value of 0.638. This observed difference across time and space was not consistent with previous assumptions that the partition coefficient is a relative measure that should not change with changing concentrations (e.g., that changes in dissolved phase concentration would be offset by changes in the particulate phase). However, the statistical correlation was relatively weak.
Net air/water fluxes were calculated for each cruise. The flux equation also was used to estimate the percent saturation of the lake based on equilibrium partitioning and the estimated air concentration. Percent saturation is the actual measured dissolved concentration divided by the postulated dissolved water concentration based on given air concentrations. Estimates of saturation are all well above 100 percent. The degree of saturation tends to be the mirror image of the net air/water flux, with the lowest saturation occurring at the time of highest flux out of the water. These two processes are intertwined, with the degree of saturation depending on the amount of volatilization. The finding of highly saturated conditions was consistent with other investigations (Hoff, Bidleman, et al., 1993; Swackhamer, Schottler, et al., 1999).
The factor cruise number (p = 0.041) and water temperature (p = 0.002) were the only parameters included in the optimal GLM model for characterizing variability in flux estimates. The R2 for this model was 0.702. This revealed that time of year and lake conditions are key factors affecting the flux of toxaphene. All results showed a negative flux (e.g., from water to air); therefore, the overall toxaphene concentration in the water decreased, and the lake was a source for toxaphene to the surrounding air. The degree of that contribution varied with the time of year.
The flux out of the water appears to peak in late summer and then to decrease slightly until the October sample. This increase in volatilization from season 1 to 3 is likely the result of the H increase that comes with increasing temperature and the decrease in air concentration in late summer. The increase in H is a result of the greater increase in vapor pressure that occurs compared to the increase in water solubility as temperature increases. The air concentration decreases from a spring high level to a lower fall level. In addition, the dissolved water concentration generally decreases during this period as a result of the increased volatilization (e.g., toxaphene is transferred out of the water and into the air). Volatilization then decreases towards late fall as the air concentration remains low, and the temperature declines causing a decrease in H. The toxaphene concentration trend is exacerbated by the stratified conditions, which prevent dissolved toxaphene from the hypolimnion from mixing with the epilimnion.
In general, because toxaphene was always offgassing, dissolved concentrations in the upper water gradually decreased throughout the year (as was shown by the 1998 data). In spring, volatilization again increased as the lake was mixing for two main reasons: (1) toxaphene was redistributed from the hypolimnion, thereby raising the dissolved concentration; and (2) air temperature increased (which increases H). In 1997, there was a significant increase in dissolved concentration from spring to fall, due to periodic upwelling in the eastern and central basins of the lake. As a result, it destratified the lake and allowed toxaphene from the hypolimnion to be mixed throughout the lake.
The dissolved water concentrations also were used to back-calculate an air concentration that would result in steady state conditions across the air/water boundary. When the dissolved water concentrations from this study were used to generate these air concentrations, they were much higher than previous estimates, which were utilized in estimating the current net air/water flux. However, these estimated air vapor toxaphene concentrations are similar to those used to model the peak input interval for toxaphene in Lake Superior (Swackhamer, Schottler, et al., 1999). These elevated air concentrations facilitated transfer from air to water and provided the past source of toxaphene for Lake Superior.
Because the air levels were much lower, the lake was constantly offgassing toxaphene. The cold water temperatures and low particulate levels in the water limited the amount of toxaphene that can be removed from the lake each year. The high toxaphene water saturation values are an echo of past high toxaphene air concentrations and provide strong evidence that the lake is not at steady state with respect to air/water transfer. In addition, the homogenous concentration and even distribution of toxaphene homologs in the water column strongly support the assertion that the main source of toxaphene to Lake Superior has been atmospheric transfer.
Surface water concentrations varied significantly by year and season. They correlate to the air/water interface temperature. Concentrations are strongly correlated with the thermal state of the lake, being elevated during isothermal conditions (both in spring and fall) as a result of mixing from the hypolimnion. The yearly overall average concentration for all compounds declined slightly from year to year, due to losses from volatilization. Volatilization only occured from the epilimnion during stratified conditions, which is likely to result in a vertical concentration gradient. However, the dissolved phase concentrations did not vary by horizontal location within the lake, which supports the assertion that the main source to the lake was air/water transfer rather than point-source discharges.
There were significant differences in particulate toxaphene concentration across years, seasons, and stations, indicating that the particulate concentration changes over both time and space, depending on local conditions. Concentrations were lower in the western basin as a result of dilution from a higher particulate load.
The total toxaphene Kp gradually increased within a sample year, due to the slow uptake of toxaphene into the particulate phase relative to changes in the dissolved concentration. In addition, the Kp for different homologs showed no significant trend with additional chlorines and does not correlate with organic carbon content of particulates. The lack of a trend/correlation is most likely because the lake is not at a steady state with respect to toxaphene. This imbalance is the result of seasonally changing limnological conditions in the lake and a significant decline in air concentration. OC pesticide Kp values correlated with organic carbon, providing evidence that they are at a steady state with respect to the dissolved/particulate phases.
The net air/water flux of toxaphene was consistently negative, indicating transfer from water to air throughout the year. Volatilization was the main toxaphene loss pathway. As a result of minimal loss pathways and lowering air concentrations over time, the lake was highly saturated throughout the year. This effect is an additional indication that the lake is not at a steady state with respect to total toxaphene.
The dissolved concentrations for total toxaphene and each of the homologs had a normal distribution. The particulate concentrations for toxaphene and toxaphene homologs, expressed on a per gram dry mass basis, are not normally distributed (Kolmogorov-Smirnov p < 0.006; Shapiro-Wilk p < 0.01; n = 43). Therefore, log transformed particulate data are used to examine statistical trends.
Although the SPM data (n = 44) initially were not normally distributed (Shapiro-Wilk p < 0.01), a detailed review of the data indicated that this result was being driven by a high bias resulting from three outliers. When the three outliers were removed from the data, the overall mean did not change significantly (Student's t-test, p = 0.227). When normality was checked without the outliers, the data were found to be normally distributed. Therefore, the SPM data are considered normally distributed.
The POC data were found to have a trimodal distribution based on when the sample was taken. For this reason, when the entire set of POC data were checked for normality, they were shown to be abnormal (Shaprio-Wilk p < 0.01). An ANOVA of POC data by cruise number indicated that there were significant (p < 0.001) differences between cruises, with the spring 1997, spring 1998, and the fall cruises forming separate groups. When the POC data were grouped into these catagories, each was found to be normal (Shapiro-Wilk p > 0.286). Because the homogenous groupings of POC had a normal distribution, and the POC data are not used as a group (but rather are applied to individual concentration data), no transformation was performed on the POC data.
The dissolved concentration phases from Stations 18 and 27 from spring 1998, were collected and extracted, but did not show a measurable response due to problems in the extraction procedure.
The relative percent differences for three duplicate toxaphene Stations (50b, 4/98; 24, 8/98; and 27, 8/98) were above the 50 percent limit established in the QAPP. However, each of these samples were from the particulate phase, and were very close to the MDL. Therefore, small differences in measurement and analysis can lead to very large relative differences between sample concentration estimates. The reported concentrations for each of these stations were consistent with other stations from the period, and a review of collection and analysis records did not reveal any reason for the large differences. Therefore, these samples are flagged but maintained in the database.
The surrogate recovery on four samples (XAD 50b, 4/97; XAD 24, 4/98; particulate 18, 9/97; and particulate 24 8/98) was less than the 50 percent required by the QAPP. However, the surrogate-corrected results from these stations were consistent with similar stations and times. The surrogate-corrected results will be flagged in the data tables, but maintained in the final database. All other data met required QA/QC criteria.
A general univariate linear model (GLM) was used to examine the sources of variability in total toxaphene concentration and for each individual toxaphene homolog (see Table 2). Models were developed by optimizing the significance and correlation of a grouping of factors and covariates. Data for the dissolved and particulate phases were followed by an analysis of homolog distribution, an estimation of water/particle partitioning, and an estimation of fluxes between media.
| Parameter | Type | Description |
| Basin | Fixed Factor | 1 = Northern basin; 2 = Green Bay3 = Southern Basin |
| Station | Fixed Factor | Numerical location designator |
| Cruise number | Fixed Factor | Sequential order of major cruises; 1-4 |
| Year | Fixed Factor | Sample year; 1997;1998 |
| Season | Fixed Factor | 1 = isothermal; 4 = stratified |
| SPM | Covariate | Suspended Particulate Matter |
| POC | Covariate | Particulate Organic Carbon |
| Water temp (°C) | Covariate | Surface water temperature |
The cruise numbers are: 1 = April/May 1997; 2 = September 1997; 3 = March/April 1998; 4 = August/September 1998. The three basins were defined as: Northern basin = Stations 52b, 47, and 41; Southern basin = Stations 27, 23, 18, and 5; and Green Bay = Stations 24 and 50B. These basin groupings were based on relative proximity to each other and circulation patterns within the lake that tend to isolate these areas. The seasons represent spring unstratified conditions (season 1) and late-summer stratified conditions (season 4; used to be consistent with Lake Superior).
Ninety-five percent of toxaphene mass in Lake Michigan is present in the dissolved phase, and three-quarters of that is present as 6-Cl and 7-Cl homologs. Dissolved total toxaphene concentrations are more variable than those observed in Lake Superior and ranged from 0.14 to 0.80 ng/L.
A univariate GLM model was optimized to describe variability in the total dissolved toxaphene concentration. This model had an R2 value of 0.780. The basin term also was significant (p < 0.001) when substituted for station, yielding an R2 of 0.645. This indicates that both time and location played a significant role in explaining variability in the dissolved toxaphene concentration in Lake Michigan, in contrast to the lack of location dependence in Lake Superior. An examination of location differences reveals that the overall average for stations located in Green Bay is significantly lower than either the northern (p = 0.001) or southern basins (p = 0.002). In addition, there is no significant difference between the northern and southern basins (p > 0.88). The data are consistent with the assertion that the open lake locations decrease in concentration later in the year, due to the increased flux from water to air that results from the lower air concentration, higher water temperature, and the reduced effective volume of the lake (only the epilimnion is available to the surface for exchange with air during stratified conditions). The concentration within Green Bay does not appear to vary significantly over the seasons because the hypolimnion in Green Bay constitutes a much smaller percentage of the total water volume in the bay compared with the hypolimnetic/epilimnetic volume ratio in the main basin of the lake. The decline in the main basin is consistent with the negative correlation (slope = -0.01; p < 0.001) between dissolved concentration and water temperature. This correlation is directly related to the fact that higher surface water temperatures were associated with stratified conditions and promoted volatilization. In addition, colder surface water temperatures are associated with isothermal (and therefore elevated toxaphene) conditions.
The high concentrations in the open lake basins in spring were caused by mixing during spring isothermal conditions, bringing toxaphene from the hypolimnion up to the surface. Although there was an apparent decline in overall average dissolved toxaphene concentration from year to year, this trend is not statistically significant. These data are comparable to dissolved concentrations for 1994-1996 (0.38 + 0.12 ng/L) (Swackhamer, Pearson, et al., 1998), and it appears that the overall average concentration in the lake is not significantly changing. This shows that Lake Michigan recently has been near steady state conditions and only recently has begun consistently offgassing toxaphene as the air concentration has decreased.
In general, the pattern for the homologs is similar to that found for total toxaphene, with no significant difference between sample years, high levels in spring, low levels in Green Bay, gradual (but not statistically significant) decline between sample years, and a negative correlation with water and air temperature. Low levels for the 6-Cl homologs for spring 1998 may be the result of the relatively mild winter of 1997-1998, allowing the preferential offgassing of the more volatile 6-Cl homologs. This would not have significantly affected the trends in the total toxaphene concentration because the 6-Cl homolog is only 8 percent of the total dissolved mass.
Variability in the descriptive characteristics SPM and POC for Lake Michigan is explained by three main factors. Both SPM and POC changed significantly as time and location changed on the lake. For example, the POC changed between spring cruises (average = 12.6 percent) and fall cruises (average = 27.9 percent). This may be the result of greater input of inorganic particulates during the spring run-off period and higher primary productivity in warmer periods.
The variability in the particulate phase toxaphene concentration is three times that of the dissolved phase as indicated by the relative 95 percent confidence interval of all the data. The optimal model (R2 = 0.779) describing variability included the factor's cruise number (p < 0.001) and POC (p = 0.006). In contrast to the dissolved phase, there is no significant difference between basins or stations. Therefore, the particulate concentration varies over time, but not over space. In addition, the amount of organic carbon in the particle significantly affects the toxaphene concentration. This is consistent with toxaphene being a hydrophobic compound, and the fact that Lake Michigan is nearly at steady state conditions.
When the concentration trend for total toxaphene was examined, a significant decline between seasons was shown for both sample years. There also was a significantly higher concentration in the spring of 1997 than the remaining three cruises. The dissolved toxaphene concentration for April/May cruises, however, were not dramatically different between years. The particulate concentration negatively correlated with water temperature (slope = -1.14; p <0.001). The spring 1997, results were higher than the average particulate concentrations of 9.4 + 1.2 ng/g for 1994-1996 (Swackhamer, Pearson, et al., 1998). The higher concentrations were obtained across all stations and sample times, ruling out bias from a single, high result. It is not readily apparent at this time why levels were elevated in early 1997.
Both the slope and the intercept for samples collected during isothermal spring conditions are higher than those collected during stratified conditions. This indicates that the particles present in the spring have a higher overall concentration both per gram dry weight and per gram carbon, and that the concentration increases more rapidly as a function of organic carbon. As a result, some of the particles in spring may have been suspended in the water column for the entire winter by isothermal conditions, allowing additional time for the toxaphene to partition from the dissolved phase to the particulate. It is likely that particles present in the summer have just recently been introduced to the system (via runoff or algae growth) and have less time to attain steady state concentrations. The spring 1998 value was low because particles had low levels of organic carbon. In general, the decrease in the particulate concentration over the course of a year is caused by a combination of the decrease in the dissolved phase, the introduction of fresh particles to the system, and the length of time required to attain steady state levels.
The optimal models for describing variability in the particulate phase for toxaphene homologs are similar to those for total toxaphene in that they have no spatial variability. When all particulate concentrations of individual toxaphene homologs are plotted against POC, no correlation is found. However, when data are grouped by stratification status, there are significant trends. The slope of the least squares linear regression line is dramatically larger for unstratified conditions compared to stratified ones. In addition, the stratified data generally has a much lower significance. This stronger correlation for unstratified data shows that the toxaphene in the carbon portion of the particles is similar to steady state conditions.
There are no significant spatial differences for either the dissolved or particulate phase with respect to homolog distribution. There are, however, significant differences between media, with the dissolved phase having the higher prevalence of lower chlorinated homologs. This pattern is consistent with air/water transfer as the main source of toxaphene. The sediment data are included as an overall average from the entire depth of the core. The average homolog distribution of the sediment surface sections (n = 6), is not statistically different from the suspended particulates. The lower chlorinated homologs gradually increased in prevalence with depth in the core, indicating that dechlorination may be occurring over time.
The distribution of the 9-Cl homologs as a fraction of the total is the only group to demonstrate a significant correlation with water temperature. The negative slope of the plot of 9-Cl homolog prevalence versus water temperature indicates that as water temperature increases, the amount of 9-Cl homolog decreases. Though it can be assumed that this transformation results in a higher percentage in the lower chlorinated homologs, the total mass of the 9-Cl homologs was so small that it made the contribution to the other homologs insignificant. The lack of a statistically significant trend in the other homologs is likely the result of scatter in the data. Both the 6-Cl and 7-Cl homologs have a positive, but not significant, slope when plotted against water temperature. In addition, the 8-Cl homologs have a negative slope, but it also is not statistically significant. These general results are consistent with the trend observed in Lake Superior, where higher water temperatures correlated with a higher percentage of lower chlorinated homologs. Although the mean levels showed a correlation with temperature, the lack of statistical significance indicates that the trend was very weak, regarding the variation of individual toxaphene homologs within a given media.
The water particle partitioning coefficient (Kp) for toxaphene in Lake Michigan contributes to the variability in the Kp; it is related to both time and space. The amount of organic carbon in the particulate phase was not found to be significant, when we used this model (p = 0.451 when POC added to other optimal factors). The R2 for this optimal model was 0.816. However, when combined with the factor's season or cruise number individually, the POC was found to be highly significant (p < 0.001). This indicates that the amount of organic carbon in the particulate phase does affect the partitioning of toxaphene, and is consistent with the fact that POC significantly affects particulate toxaphene concentration. However, POC is not included in the optimal model for Kp, because the amount of variability explained by models (R2) including POC is lower than the optimal set of parameters.
When the log Kp's for all data are plotted against POC, no significant correlation is obtained for total toxaphene. However, there is a strong correlation between the POC and the seasonal log Kp, with the spring cruises having significantly higher Kp values than the summer cruises. This is consistent with the fact that the April/May cruise particulate concentration is significantly higher on a per gram carbon basis than the August/September cruise value. The slopes of the plots are similar, but the intercept between least squares regression lines for individual seasons slightly differs from an order of magnitude, which is similar to the seasonal difference in particulate concentration, per gram carbon.
An inter-basin comparison of Kp over the course of the project shows that the southern basin was less than Green Bay (p = 0.016) during stratified conditions. The statistical significance of the difference, however, is relatively poor, because of variability in the results and the small number of observations. The northern basin and Green Bay are not significantly different from each other. The lower value in the southern basin may be the result of the increased particulate loading to the southern basin from the southern shoreline during summer compared to the northern basin, causing a dilution effect.
The water temperature is negatively correlated (p = 0.002) to the log Kp. This negative slope results because the particulate concentration declines faster relative to the dissolved concentration with increasing water temperature as the year progresses. The reasons for the decline in the particulate concentration over time within a year were explained previously. This difference between seasons persisted when the organic carbon partition coefficient (Koc) is estimated. Because the dissolved concentration declined slightly through the year, and the particulate concentration declined precipitously, both as per total mass and on a per gram carbon basis, the estimated Koc is highly dependent on the season.
The variability in the partition coefficients for the individual toxaphene homologs depends on which homolog is being examined. The partitioning is most strongly affected by changes in time (as represented by the factor cruise number) and by location within the lake for the most prevalent homologs. However, the significance of the correlation decreases (e.g., the likelihood of an actual correlation increases) with increasing chlorine content of the homologs. This is consistent with partitioning theory, which states that higher chlorinated compounds are more strongly bound to the organic fraction of a particle. The highest chlorinated homologs did not have any significant factors, indicating that variability in these values could not be explained by factors in this study.
The average Kp across each of the toxaphene homologs generally increases as the number of chlorines increases. This is consistent with partitioning theory, differs from the results from Lake Superior, and indicates that Lake Michigan is more characteristic of steady state conditions. In addition, there is a downward trend within each homolog across seasons for all but the 9-Cl and 10-Cl homologs. This is the result of the difference in particulate concentrations over time.
Toxaphene may enter Lake Michigan by one of three main routes: (1) direct application (intentionally, inadvertently, or criminally) in the past; (2) inflow from major tributaries; and (3) exchange across the air/water boundary. There was no record of toxaphene ever being used directly on Lake Michigan, and tributaries were assumed to be below detection limit due to their relatively small surface area, limited past use of toxaphene in the Midwest, and lack of current applications. A recent study of sediment near seven pulp and paper mills along rivers that flow into Lake Michigan suggested that at present, they are not significant sources of toxaphene to the lake (Shanks, McDonald, et al., 1999). It was concluded that the majority of the toxaphene in Lake Michigan was from exchange across the air/water boundary because the likelihood of other sources had been reduced.
Toxaphene may leave Lake Michigan by one of four main routes: (1) surface water outflow; (2) deposition to sediments; (3) degradation within the lake itself; and (4) volatilization. The only major surface water outflows for Lake Michigan are the Chicago river in the southern basin and the Straits of Macinac at the northern end of the lake. These two sources combined account for an outflow of 1600 m3/second (USEPA and Environment Canada, 1995). Using the average dissolved toxaphene concentration for each year sampled (mean + 95 percent CI; 0.404 + 0.222 ng/L for 1997; 0.353 + 0.104 ng/L for 1998), this yields an outflow of 20.2 kg/yr for 1997, and 17.3 kg/yr for 1998. The total mass of toxaphene in the water of Lake Michigan is 1835 kg, based on a total volume of 4290 km3 (USEPA and Environment Canada 1995) and an average toxaphene concentration of 0.378 ng/L (overall average of all data from this study). Therefore, loss via surface water outflow is about 1 percent per year.
Values for the air side mass transfer coefficient (ka) and air vapor concentration (Ca,v) are the same as those used for Lake Superior. The values used in the flux calculations are averaged over an individual cruise to maintain consistent time intervals for all parameters. The air concentrations used were monthly averages, ka was chosen to match the reported seasonal values (Hoff, Bidleman, et al., 1993), and the air/water interface temperatures were based on Schwab, et al., 1999.
The final net air/water flux estimates indicate that toxaphene is nearly always offgassing from Lake Michigan, as represented by the negative flux values. In May 1998, review of Station 50 indicates that this was the only station that showed a positive flux. This was likely the result of the combination of very low water concentration (0.11 ng/L), high air concentrations, and relatively low temperature. The percent saturation of the lake also may be estimated by setting the flux equal to zero, generating a water concentration based on the estimated air concentration, and then comparing that water concentration to the measure value for that location.
The flux out of the stations in Green Bay was significantly (p = 0.001) less than that for the open lake basins. This occurs because the dissolved concentration in Green Bay is lower compared to the open lake. As a result, during summer stratified conditions, the open lake locations lose significantly greater amounts of toxaphene than those in Green Bay, resulting in all areas of the surface of the lake having similar concentration.
The negative correlation of the dissolved phase concentration with both water and air temperature is likely the result of the increase in H that occurs with increasing temperature. In addition, the range of day/night temperature change is buffered by the lake. The increase in H promotes the movement from water to air by increasing the second term in the net air/water flux equation (e.g. Cw,d x (H/RT)). The increased transfer from water to air acts to lower the surface concentration.
The high estimates of Lake Michigan's saturation are in contrast to previous reports (Swackhamer, Schottler, et al., 1999), which showed summer saturation to be 50 percent and the annual average saturation to be 82 percent. This discrepancy results from the significantly lower air vapor concentrations used in this study compared to previous estimates. The lower air concentration results in higher volatilization and saturation values. Progressively lower air concentrations are expected as production gradually diminishes (due to regulatory restrictions) and use declines, and as historic stockpiles and applications degrade/weather.
It has been proposed that northern Lake Michigan has received significant non-atmospheric toxaphene input in the past (Pearson, 1996). Possible sources for this non-atmospheric input may include the pulp and paper industry, residuals from past piscicidal uses in the basin, trace releases from hazardous waste sites (MDPH, 1997), agricultural runoff, or incidental, accidental, or unreported spills in the past. Data from the water column in this study (which represents more recent conditions) are consistent with an atmospheric source for the toxaphene in Lake Michigan, and a lack of current point-source inputs. This is based on the lack of spatial differences for particulate toxaphene, lower dissolved concentrations in Green Bay, a homolog distribution similar to the air profile, year-round offgassing, highly saturated conditions, and seasonal variations that correlate to a gradually declining, non-replenished toxaphene sink. Point-source inputs (e.g., paper mills, runoff, spills, releases from hazardous sites, and one-time piscicidic application) would have to have been massive and sufficiently long ago to allow the lake to have become evenly mixed.
Toxaphene concentrations in individual sections reflected the highly variable depositional environment in Green Bay. The analytical limit of dectection was reached in cores 52b, 24, and 137, and a significant drop-off obtained in core 32 (e.g., most of the toxaphene inventory was likely captured). Core 137 had more variable trends with depth due to mixing and the possible presence of sand lenses. Core 50b reached a tight clay layer at 16 cm, indicating that the entire length of the core has been mixed, while core 13 still had significant levels of toxaphene at 20 cm.
Sediment concentration was multiplied by the average mass sedimentation rates to determine the accumulation rate for toxaphene in ng/m2 yr. For core 24, the sedimentation rate appeared to be constant, allowing for the use of a single average value. In core 52b, there were two distinct rates, with a higher slope in more recent history. This was likely due to an increase in the eutrophic status of the bay with increasing discharges from sewage, industry, and growing population. The individual average slopes for these two zones were used, with the average value of the two slopes applied to the section at the slope change. Since the 210Pb horizon was defined in each of these cores, a single focusing factor was used to generate the estimates.
The total toxaphene mass accumulations gradually decreased with depth in the core, and the surface results were only slightly lower than those obtained for Lake Superior. The lower concentration in the water column of Lake Michigan was offset by the higher deposition rate, resulting in fairly similar accumulation rates. The deepest measured toxaphene accumulation regions (2-2.5 cm at Station 52b; 2-3 cm at Station 24) are associated with sediment from about 60 years ago (e.g., late 1930s). This correlates with the time that toxaphene was first introduced and used, and indicates that toxaphene began appearing in Lake Michigan almost immediately after large-scale agricultural use started.
These accumulations are significantly lower than previously reported values (Pearson, Swackhamer, et al., 1997) as a result of lower sediment surface concentrations (15-45 ng/g versus 2-5 ng/g). This decline in sediment concentration is likely the result of a combination of three main factors. One factor is an actual decline in concentration as a result of the reduction in the total toxaphene burden in the water column of the lake over the 6 years between samples. Secondly, most of the samples were taken in Green Bay rather than in the open lake basin. Furthermore, differences in quantitation methods may have reported different concentrations by rejecting given peaks in the chromatogram, using the current method that the previous method would have included as acceptable toxaphene.
Total toxaphene inventories are used to investigate whether an area has had significant excess toxaphene deposition compared to other areas of the lake. For example, the series of five sediment cores taken along Green Bay appear to show a decrease in inventory from the southern end of the bay (e.g., at the outlet of the Fox River) to the outlet at the northern portion of the lake. As with the accumulations, these inventory estimates are significantly lower than previously reported results (Pearson, Swackhamer, et al., 1997).
Over 95 percent of the mass of toxaphene in the water column of Lake Michigan is in the dissolved phase, with a homolog distribution that reflected air/water transfer as the main source. The dissolved concentration was significantly lower in Green Bay compared with the open lake, but there was no significant difference in dissolved toxaphene concentrations between the northern and southern basins. Concentration also varied over seasons, showing higher levels in the open lake in spring isothermal conditions, and is correlated to air/water interface temperature. This is consistent with the trend observed in Lake Superior, whereby hypolimnetic toxaphene is mixed to the surface during isothermal conditions.
The spring (isothermal) total toxaphene particulate concentrations, on a mass per gram carbon basis, are nine times higher than the summer (stratified) concentration. This disparity is the result of the long time required for the particles to reach steady state conditions with respect to dissolved toxaphene. Both the dissolved and particulate concentrations in Lake Michigan are much less than those observed for Lake Superior.
The homolog distribution of each of the media samples was significantly different, with the sediment having the highest percentage of 6-Cl homologs. The dissolved phase had the greatest proportion of 7-Cl homologs, and had a distribution that mimicked the air phase. The increase in the higher chlorinated homologs in the particulate phase reflects the preferential volatilization of the more soluble homologs.
There was a strong correlation with the seasonal log Kp and POC, with the spring cruises having a significantly higher Kp value. In addition, the southern basin was
Journal Articles on this Report : 2 Displayed | Download in RIS Format
| Other project views: | All 2 publications | 2 publications in selected types | All 2 journal articles |
|---|
| Type | Citation | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
James RR, McDonald JG, Symonik DM, Swackhamer DL, Hites RA. Volatilization of toxaphene from Lakes Michigan and Superior. Environmental Science & Technology 2001;35(18):3653-3660. |
R825246 (Final) |
Exit |
|
|
Swackhamer DL, Pearson RF, Schottle SP. Toxaphene in the Great Lakes. Chemosphere 1998;37(9-12):2545-2561. |
R825246 (Final) |
|
Supplemental Keywords:
particulate organic carbon, POC, bornanes, bornenes, pinenes, camphenes, bioaccumulation factor, BAF, homolog, epilimnion, STELLA, Lake Michigan, Lake Superior, water quality., RFA, Scientific Discipline, Air, Ecosystem Protection/Environmental Exposure & Risk, Geographic Area, Water, Waste, Ecological Indicators, Air Deposition, EPA Region, State, Ecosystem Protection, Watersheds, Environmental Chemistry, Ecosystem/Assessment/Indicators, Contaminated Sediments, exploratory research environmental biology, tropospheric ozone, Ecological Effects - Environmental Exposure & Risk, Atmospheric Sciences, Ecological Effects - Human Health, Limnology, air toxics, Great Lakes, Chemical Mixtures - Environmental Exposure & Risk, Water & Watershed, Toxaphene, Lake Michigan, lake ecosystem, contaminated sediment, water quality, ecological assessment, human exposure, atmospheric inputs, resource management, atmospheric deposition, fish contamination, fate and transport, mass balance model, atmospheric contaminants, ecological exposure, Region 5, air-water exchange, toxics, Lake Superior, Michigan (MI), aquatic ecosystems, toxaphene loading, exposure and effects, atmospheric processesProgress and Final Reports:
Original AbstractThe perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.