Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you have safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Contact Us

Grantee Research Project Results

2003 Progress Report: A Hierarchical Patch Dynamics Approach to Regional Modeling and Scaling

EPA Grant Number: R827676
Title: A Hierarchical Patch Dynamics Approach to Regional Modeling and Scaling
Investigators: Wu, Jianguo
Current Investigators: Wu, Jianguo , Green, Douglas
Institution: Arizona State University - West
EPA Project Officer: Packard, Benjamin H
Project Period: October 15, 1999 through October 14, 2002
Project Period Covered by this Report: October 15, 2002 through October 14, 2003
Project Amount: $629,540
RFA: Regional Scale Analysis and Assessment (1999) RFA Text |  Recipients Lists
Research Category: Aquatic Ecosystems , Ecological Indicators/Assessment/Restoration

Objective:

The objective of this research project is to explore the scaling relations for landscape pattern when it is measured over a range of scales (grain size and extent). Landscape pattern is spatially correlated and scale dependent. Thus, understanding landscape structure and functioning requires multiscale information, and scaling functions are the most precise and concise way of quantifying multiscale characteristics explicitly.

Progress Summary:

The results of our study showed that the responses of landscape metrics to changing scale fell into two categories when computed at the class level (i.e., for individual land cover types): (1) simple scaling functions; and (2) unpredictable behavior. Similarly, three categories were found at the landscape level, with the third being staircase pattern, in a previous study when all land cover types were combined together. In general, scaling relations were more variable at the class level than at the landscape level, and were more consistent and predictable with changing grain size than with changing extent at both levels. Considering that the landscapes under study were quite diverse in terms of both composition and configuration, these results seem robust. This study highlights the need for multiscale analysis to adequately characterize and monitor landscape heterogeneity, and provides insights into the scaling of landscape patterns.

Spatial scaling provides an indispensable basis for understanding how landscapes are structured, how they function, and how they change over time. Scaling also is crucial for successful interdisciplinary research and environmental problem solving. However, spatial heterogeneity, nonlinearity, feedbacks, and hierarchical linkages make scaling often formidable. We have reviewed the two general types of scaling approaches dominant in ecology and related earth sciences: dynamic model-based and similarity-based scaling approaches. From our own study and a number of other studies, we conclude that there is no universal scaling law for complex landscapes. Thus, it is critical to find an appropriate scaling method or a proper combination of scaling methods for different types of ecological problems.

Future Activities:

We will continue to explore the scaling relations for landscape pattern when it is measured over a range of scales (grain size and extent).


Journal Articles on this Report : 4 Displayed | Download in RIS Format

Publications Views
Other project views: All 73 publications 44 publications in selected types All 33 journal articles
Publications
Type Citation Project Document Sources
Journal Article Berling-Wolff S, Wu J. Modeling urban landscape dynamics: a review. Ecological Research 2004;19(1):119-129. R827676 (2003)
R827676 (Final)
  • Abstract: SpringerLink
    Exit
  • Journal Article Musacchio LR, Wu J. Collaborative landscape-scale ecological research: emerging trends in urban and regional ecology. Urban Ecosystems 2004;7(3):175-178. R827676 (2000)
    R827676 (2001)
    R827676 (2002)
    R827676 (2003)
    R827676 (Final)
  • Full-text: Arizona State University-Full Text PDF
    Exit
  • Abstract: Springer-Citation
    Exit
  • Journal Article Shao GF, We WC, Wu G, Zhou XH, Wu JG. An explicit index for assessing the accuracy of cover-class areas. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 2003;69(8):907-913. R827676 (2003)
    R827676 (Final)
  • Full-text: American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
    Exit
  • Journal Article Wu J. Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis: scaling relations. Landscape Ecology 2004;19(2):125-138. R827676 (2003)
    R827676 (Final)
  • Full-text: Arizona State University-Full Text PDF
    Exit
  • Abstract: SpringerLink-Abstract
    Exit
  • Supplemental Keywords:

    land, soil, urban, stressors, ecosystem, regionalization, scaling, terrestrial, habitat, integrated assessment, sustainable development, ecology, modeling, landsat, remote sensing, field measurements, Southwest, agriculture, urbanization., RFA, Scientific Discipline, Air, Geographic Area, Ecosystem Protection/Environmental Exposure & Risk, Ecology, Ecosystem Protection, Environmental Chemistry, climate change, State, Ecological Effects - Environmental Exposure & Risk, Environmental Monitoring, Regional/Scaling, ecological exposure, scaling, urbanization, hierarchical patch dynamics, spatial scale, functional complexity, modeling, anthropogenic, Arizona (AZ), ecosystem, agriculture, regional survey data, remote sensing imagery, field measurements, land use

    Relevant Websites:

    http://leml.asu.edu/EPASTAR-Proj/ Exit
    http://LEML.asu.edu/ Exit

    Progress and Final Reports:

    Original Abstract
  • 2000 Progress Report
  • 2001 Progress Report
  • Final Report
  • Top of Page

    The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

    Project Research Results

    • Final Report
    • 2001 Progress Report
    • 2000 Progress Report
    • Original Abstract
    73 publications for this project
    33 journal articles for this project

    Site Navigation

    • Grantee Research Project Results Home
    • Grantee Research Project Results Basic Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Advanced Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Fielded Search
    • Publication search
    • EPA Regional Search

    Related Information

    • Search Help
    • About our data collection
    • Research Grants
    • P3: Student Design Competition
    • Research Fellowships
    • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)
    Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
    Last updated April 28, 2023
    United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Discover.

    • Accessibility
    • Budget & Performance
    • Contracting
    • EPA www Web Snapshot
    • Grants
    • No FEAR Act Data
    • Plain Writing
    • Privacy
    • Privacy and Security Notice

    Connect.

    • Data.gov
    • Inspector General
    • Jobs
    • Newsroom
    • Open Government
    • Regulations.gov
    • Subscribe
    • USA.gov
    • White House

    Ask.

    • Contact EPA
    • EPA Disclaimers
    • Hotlines
    • FOIA Requests
    • Frequent Questions

    Follow.