Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you have safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Contact Us

Grantee Research Project Results

2001 Progress Report: Molecular Detection of Anaerobic Bacteria as Indicator Species for Fecal Pollution in Water

EPA Grant Number: R827639
Title: Molecular Detection of Anaerobic Bacteria as Indicator Species for Fecal Pollution in Water
Investigators: Field, Katharine G.
Institution: Oregon State University
EPA Project Officer: Packard, Benjamin H
Project Period: November 1, 1999 through October 31, 2002
Project Period Covered by this Report: November 1, 2000 through October 31, 2001
Project Amount: $223,829
RFA: Ecological Indicators (1999) RFA Text |  Recipients Lists
Research Category: Ecological Indicators/Assessment/Restoration , Aquatic Ecosystems

Objective:

This project involves the extension and validation of a new method to rapidly detect fecal pollution in water, and discriminate its source, based on amplification of genetic markers from the Bacteroides-Prevotella group of fecal bacteria. The objectives of the project are to develop additional species-specific Bacteroides-Prevotella indicators, to identify unique Bacteroides-Prevotella 16S rDNA sequences in clone libraries from multiple animal species, and to develop a real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay to quantify the contributions of different species to fecal contamination in water.

Progress Summary:

We have constructed Bacteroides-Prevotella 16S rDNA clone libraries from feces of the following species: elk, pig, dog, cat, and horse. Clones were screened by terminal restriction fragment length analysis (T-RFLP). Multiple representatives from each restriction fragment pattern type were chosen for sequencing. Phylogenetic analysis found that ruminant sequences (elk and cow) comprise two novel gene clusters. Most elk sequences are very closely related to cow sequences. However, there are at least three small subclusters of elk-specific sequences. Most sequences from pig fell into the genus Prevotella, either as unknown lineages, or related to P. buccaformis and P. ruminicola. In most groups, fecal Bacteroides-Prevotella appear to have coevolved with host species. Sequences from dog and cat, however, were closely related to human sequences, suggesting that humans and their pets acquire fecal bacteria horizontally.

The sequence analyses were used to design general and species-specific PCR primers. Out of four tested, one general Bacteroides-Prevotella-specific primer worked very well, allowing us to exploit a variable region of the gene. Although there was overlap among human, dog, and cat sequences, both our original PCR primers designed to be human-specific did not amplify any sequences from dog and cat. We designed, optimized, and tested 12 new primers, only to find that many of them amplified targets from additional species. We concluded that it is not practical (because of the large cost) to construct clone libraries large enough to sample the entire range of sequence diversity found within each species. Nevertheless, the observed patterns of diversity indicate that there is substantial endemism within the Bacteroides-Prevotella group. Therefore, we have decided to try another approach to design Bacteroides-Prevotella primers. We will use our Bacteroides-Prevotella general primers to amplify sequences to use in subtractive hybridization.

We have designed real-time quantitative PCR nuclease (TaqMan) assays for both general Bacteroides-Prevotella (to measure total fecal pollution) and from human fecal pollution.

Future Activities:

We will develop a rapid method of water quality assessment, and a method of quantifying the contribution of different sources to fecal pollution in water. We currently are testing these primer sets in real-time assays.


Journal Articles on this Report : 1 Displayed | Download in RIS Format

Publications Views
Other project views: All 38 publications 10 publications in selected types All 8 journal articles
Publications
Type Citation Project Document Sources
Journal Article Bernhard AE, Goyard T, Simonich MT, Field KG. Application of a rapid method for identifying fecal pollution sources in a multi-use estuary. Water Research 2003;37(4):909-913. R827639 (2001)
R827639 (2002)
R827639 (Final)
CR830396 (Final)
  • Abstract from PubMed
  • Full-text: ScienceDirect - Full Text HMTL
    Exit
  • Abstract: ScienceDirect - Abstract
    Exit
  • Other: ScienceDirect - Full Text PDF
    Exit
  • Supplemental Keywords:

    water, drinking water, watersheds, groundwater, marine, estuary, risk assessment, health effects, ecological effects, human health, animal, pathogens, viruses, bacteria, effluent, discharge, ecosystem, indicators, aquatic, innovative technology, conservation, environmental biology, molecular, northwest, Pacific Coast, Pacific Northwest, Oregon, OR, agriculture., RFA, Scientific Discipline, Water, Ecosystem Protection/Environmental Exposure & Risk, Nutrients, Ecology, Wastewater, Ecosystem/Assessment/Indicators, Ecosystem Protection, Environmental Chemistry, Ecological Effects - Environmental Exposure & Risk, Ecological Indicators, risk assessment, ecological exposure, aquatic, health indicator, aquatic ecosystem, environmental monitoring, microbial indicators, nutrient transport, sewage treatment, bacteria, anaerobic bacteria, coliform, waterfowl, ecosystem indicators, estuarine ecosystems, water quality, coliforms, sewage treratment, water treatment, fecal pollution

    Relevant Websites:

    http://www.cgrb.orst.edu/mcb/faculty/field/ Exit
    http://osu.orst.edu/dept/microbiology/fac/field2.html Exit

    Progress and Final Reports:

    Original Abstract
  • 2000 Progress Report
  • Final Report
  • Top of Page

    The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

    Project Research Results

    • Final Report
    • 2000 Progress Report
    • Original Abstract
    38 publications for this project
    8 journal articles for this project

    Site Navigation

    • Grantee Research Project Results Home
    • Grantee Research Project Results Basic Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Advanced Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Fielded Search
    • Publication search
    • EPA Regional Search

    Related Information

    • Search Help
    • About our data collection
    • Research Grants
    • P3: Student Design Competition
    • Research Fellowships
    • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)
    Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
    Last updated April 28, 2023
    United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Discover.

    • Accessibility
    • Budget & Performance
    • Contracting
    • EPA www Web Snapshot
    • Grants
    • No FEAR Act Data
    • Plain Writing
    • Privacy
    • Privacy and Security Notice

    Connect.

    • Data.gov
    • Inspector General
    • Jobs
    • Newsroom
    • Open Government
    • Regulations.gov
    • Subscribe
    • USA.gov
    • White House

    Ask.

    • Contact EPA
    • EPA Disclaimers
    • Hotlines
    • FOIA Requests
    • Frequent Questions

    Follow.