Grantee Research Project Results
Publications Details for Grant Number R828629
Designing Incentives that Strengthen Local Capacity for Land Development with Open Space and Healthy Ecosystems: Environmental Impact Fees
RFA:
Market Mechanisms and Incentives for Environmental Management (2000)
Other Views
- All
Publications - Selected
Publication Types - Journal
Articles - Publications Submitted
After Final Report - Redisplay this page with
Reference Title, Journal, and Author Columns - Display this Page
in RIS Format
Reference Type | Citation | Progress Report Year | Document Sources |
---|---|---|---|
Paper | Bhattacharya M. RI open space grants creating incentives for preservation. Department of Environmental and Natural Resource Economics, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, 2004 (major paper submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the M.S. degree). |
R828629 (Final) |
not available |
Paper | Philo LD, Swallow SK. Environmental impact fees for community-valued open space. Department of Environmental and Natural Resource Economics, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, 2004 (working paper). |
R828629 (Final) |
not available |
Paper | Swallow SK. Using contingent choice to establish impact fees for open space. Department of Environmental and Natural Resource Economics, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, 2004 (working paper). |
R828629 (Final) |
not available |
Presentation | Swallow SK, Philo LD. Considerations in funding land conservation and establishing environmental impact fees for conservation with development. Presented to the Environmental Research Seminar, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, New England Regional Science Council and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency/Office of Research and Development/National Center for Environmental Research, Boston, MA, November 14, 2002. |
R828629 (2002) |
not available |
The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.