Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you have safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Contact Us

Grantee Research Project Results

2013 Progress Report: Integration of Filtration and Advanced Oxidation: Development of a Membrane Liquid-Phase Plasma Reactor

EPA Grant Number: R835332
Title: Integration of Filtration and Advanced Oxidation: Development of a Membrane Liquid-Phase Plasma Reactor
Investigators: Bellona, Christopher , Holsen, Thomas M. , Mededovic Thagard, Selma , Dickenson, Eric
Current Investigators: Bellona, Christopher , Holsen, Thomas M. , Dickenson, Eric , Mededovic Thagard, Selma
Institution: Clarkson University , Southern Nevada Water Authority
EPA Project Officer: Packard, Benjamin H
Project Period: August 16, 2012 through August 15, 2016 (Extended to August 15, 2017)
Project Period Covered by this Report: August 16, 2012 through August 16,2013
Project Amount: $499,779
RFA: Research and Demonstration of Innovative Drinking Water Treatment Technologies in Small Systems (2011) RFA Text |  Recipients Lists
Research Category: Drinking Water , Water

Objective:

Engineer, develop and demonstrate an integrated process comprised of membrane technology and electrical discharge plasma generated via a novel reticulated vitreous carbon (RVC) electrode material. The successful development of this process will result in a technology that is scalable, robust, requires minimal chemical input, has a small foot-print, and achieves a finished water quality better than treatment systems that require multiple technologies.

Progress Summary:

During the project period the research team completed Phase I of the project (Classification and Prioritization of Contaminants) and commenced work on Phase II of the project (Fundamental Bench-scale Plasma/Membrane Reactor). The team constructed two ceramic membrane testing systems including a bench-scale system, and a pilot-scale system. The pilot-scale system will be used for demonstration testing at the Big Bend water treatment facility in Laughlin, NV during Phase IV (Demonstration of Developed Technology). A brief summary of project accomplishments is provided below.
 
Phase I: The objective of Phase I was to develop a contaminant list and necessary analytical methods to quantify them in environmental samples. The compounds chosen are being, and will be used further to develop, optimize and evaluate the plasma/membrane system. The project team compiled a list of 260 regulated, unregulated, and emerging organic contaminants. Peer-reviewed literature was screened to identify reaction rate constants for the reaction of each organic contaminant (when available) with ozone (O3) and the hydroxyl radical (•OH). Compounds then were binned according to their ability to be transformed by these oxidants including: 1) reacts quickly with O3 and •OH (reaction constant (k) > 108); 2) reacts slowly with O3 but quickly with •OH; and 3) reacts slowly with both O3 and •OH. Approximately 11 to 15 compounds then were selected from each bin based on occurrence in the environment, and the establishment of analytical methods at Clarkson or the Southern Nevada Water Authority. Because the plasma process is hypothesized to produce a variety of reactive species in aqueous solutions, the developed list (Table 1) will allow for an unbiased evaluation of the plasma process developed during the completion of the project. Analytical methods have been completed and validated for the compounds presented in Table 1.
 
 
Table 1. Organic contaminant list for plasma system development and optimization
Table 1. Organic contaminant list for plasma system development and optimization.
Reacts quickly with D2/and DH= Reacts slowly with D2 and quickly with DH= Reacts slowly with D2 and OH=
Compound Type Compound Type Compound Type
Carbamazepine Pharmaceutical Diazepam Pharmaceutical Chloraceldaad Regulated DBP
Sulfamethoxazole Pharmaceutical Iopromide X-raycontranstiagent Chlorophorm Regulated DBP
Trimethoprim Pharmaceutical Ibuprofren Pharmaceutical TCEP Flame Reardent
Caffine Stimulant 1,4-dioxaine Industrial use PFOA Industrial Use/GOCL3
Fluoxetine Pharmaceutical Meprobamate Pharmaceutical PFOS Industrial Use/GOCL3
Naproxen Pharmaceutical Dilantin Pharmaceutical PFHxA Indsrtrial Use
Tridosan Pharmaceutical DEET Insecticide PFHxS Industrial Use
Acetaminophen Pharmaceutical Primidone Pharmaceutical PFBA Industrial Use
Tridocarbon Pharmaceutical Simazine Herbicide PFBS Industrial Use
Atenolol Pharmaceutical Atrazine Herbicide NDMA DBP,ODCL3
Gemfibrozil Pharmaceutical MBTE CCL3 Sucrose Artificial Sweetener
Bisphenol-A EDC     Muslo ketone Fragrance
17ß-Estradiol EDC,ODCL3     Diatrizoate X-raycontranstiagent
        Trichloronitramethane DBP
17-αEthinylestradiol       (chloropicrin) DBP
Nitrobenzene EDC,ODCL3        

 

 
 
Phase II: The objective of Phase II is to conduct bench-scale studies to optimize the plasma process for contaminant destruction, elucidate reaction mechanisms, and evaluate system water quality. The project team commenced plasma optimization through an experimental matrix designed to identify the main parameters controlling the degradation of contaminants during plasma treatment. The team has constructed a plasma reactor consisting of a high-voltage power supply, a plasma reactor, and a cooling and recirculation system. Variables being evaluated include applied voltage, initial compound concentration, solution conductivity, recirculation flow rate, reactor type, reactor diameter, and grounded electrode plate area. Experiments were performed with three solutes, bisphenol-A, DEET (N,N-diethyl-meta-toulamide) and nitrobenzene. Results from degradation experiments indicate that applied voltage (Figure 1a), initial contaminant concentration (Figure 1b), reactor type (Figure 1c), reactor diameter, and grounded electrode plate area have a significant impact on contaminant degradation. A hybrid plasma reactor system (i.e., RVC high-voltage electrode with the grounded electrode suspended above the liquid surface) was found to achieve significantly faster degradation kinetics than the standard point-to-plane plasma reactor setup (Figure 1c).
 
Figure 1
Figure 1. Degradation of bisphenol-A (BPA) during bench-scale plasma experiments. Figure 1a: impact of applied voltage; 5 mg/L BPA, 350 μS/cm, 15°C. Figure 1b: impact of initial BPA concentration; 28 kV applied voltage, 350 μS/cm, 15°C. Figure 1c: impact of reactor type; 5 mg/L BPA, 39 kV, 350 μS/cm, 15°C.

Future Activities:

The research team will continue to optimize and engineer the plasma process through controlled experiments with single organic contaminants (Task 2A). Once these experiments are completed, the plasma process will be tested with a mixture containing the contaminants presented in Table 1 at environmentally relevant concentrations (i.e., at the ng/L concentration range). Plasma degradation experiments will be conducted in the presence of reactive species scavengers to elucidate reaction mechanisms (Task 2B). The bench-scale ceramic membrane system will be integrated with the plasma reactor, and several membrane types will be evaluated. The impact of dissolved organic matter on contaminant degradation will be evaluated by spiking organic contaminants into Raquette river water and performing plasma degradation experiments in the absence and presence of the ceramic membrane system (Task 2C).

Journal Articles:

No journal articles submitted with this report: View all 22 publications for this project

Progress and Final Reports:

Original Abstract
  • 2014 Progress Report
  • 2015 Progress Report
  • 2016 Progress Report
  • Final Report
  • Top of Page

    The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

    Project Research Results

    • Final Report
    • 2016 Progress Report
    • 2015 Progress Report
    • 2014 Progress Report
    • Original Abstract
    22 publications for this project
    6 journal articles for this project

    Site Navigation

    • Grantee Research Project Results Home
    • Grantee Research Project Results Basic Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Advanced Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Fielded Search
    • Publication search
    • EPA Regional Search

    Related Information

    • Search Help
    • About our data collection
    • Research Grants
    • P3: Student Design Competition
    • Research Fellowships
    • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)
    Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
    Last updated April 28, 2023
    United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Discover.

    • Accessibility
    • Budget & Performance
    • Contracting
    • EPA www Web Snapshot
    • Grants
    • No FEAR Act Data
    • Plain Writing
    • Privacy
    • Privacy and Security Notice

    Connect.

    • Data.gov
    • Inspector General
    • Jobs
    • Newsroom
    • Open Government
    • Regulations.gov
    • Subscribe
    • USA.gov
    • White House

    Ask.

    • Contact EPA
    • EPA Disclaimers
    • Hotlines
    • FOIA Requests
    • Frequent Questions

    Follow.