Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you have safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Contact Us

Grantee Research Project Results

Final Report: Predictive QSAR Models of Hepatotoxicity

EPA Grant Number: R834999
Title: Predictive QSAR Models of Hepatotoxicity
Investigators: Tropsha, Alex
Institution: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
EPA Project Officer: Chung, Serena
Project Period: June 1, 2011 through May 30, 2015
Project Amount: $750,000
RFA: Computational Toxicology: Biologically-Based Multi-Scale Modeling (2010) RFA Text |  Recipients Lists
Research Category: Chemical Safety for Sustainability

Objective:

The objectives of this project were to (i) compile and curate a comprehensive, chemical hepatotoxicity database; (ii) develop rigorously validated and externally predictive models of chemical hepatotoxicity; and (iii) deploy curated data, computational model building tools, and hepatotoxicity models to public ChemBench web portal. In the course of the project, we have assembled a highly curated HepaToxDV database containing accurate structures hepatotoxicity annotations of chemicals, and developed several rigorous models of hepatotoxicity (Low et al, 2011, 2013). As a major outcome of this project, we have addressed a difficult issue of QSAR model interpretation and summarized our approaches to hybrid QSAR modeling in a major review.

Summary/Accomplishments (Outputs/Outcomes):

To comment on the latter issue, a significant part of model validation is its interpretation in terms of significant descriptors and most importantly, chemical features that can be understood by chemists. Although mechanistic interpretation of multivariate models is generally considered infeasible, it is still possible to look into weights of individual features (descriptors) and attempt to map features with significant weights into chemically sensible fragments, which results in the selection of some fragments as chemical toxicity alerts. The important fragments can be determined by analyzing the statistical significance of each chemical feature based on its contribution to the success of the model. However, we should be cognizant of the fact that individual features do not act independent of each other. Thus, we have developed a new methodology that looked at co-occurrence of significant features. This approach helped us develop new complex, integrated toxicity alerts that achieved unprecedented 100% accuracy in detecting toxic compounds (Low et al, 2015).

As another major accomplishment, we have developed an integrated computational framework that relies both on chemical descriptors and results of short term biological assays to improve the accuracy of toxicity prediction. In recent years, high throughput biological assays have been increasingly employed to elucidate mechanisms of chemical toxicity and predict toxic effects of chemicals in vivo. The data generated in such assays can be considered as biological descriptors of chemicals that can be combined with molecular descriptors and employed in QSAR modeling to improve the accuracy of toxicity prediction. In a recent review (Low et al, 2014), we have discussed several approaches for integrating chemical and biological data for predicting biological effects of chemicals in vivo and compare their performance across several data sets. 

Conclusions:

We concluded that while no method consistently shows superior performance, the integrative approaches rank consistently among the best yet offer enriched interpretation of models over those built with either chemical or biological data alone.


Journal Articles on this Report : 4 Displayed | Download in RIS Format

Publications Views
Other project views: All 4 publications 4 publications in selected types All 4 journal articles
Publications
Type Citation Project Document Sources
Journal Article Low YS, Sedykh AY, Rusyn I, Tropsha A. Integrative approaches for predicting in vivo effects of chemicals from their structural descriptors and the results of short-term biological assays. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry 2014;14(11):1356-1364. R834999 (Final)
R832720 (2009)
R833825 (Final)
R835166 (2014)
R835166 (2016)
R835166 (Final)
  • Full-text from PubMed
  • Abstract from PubMed
  • Associated PubMed link
  • Abstract: Bentham Science-Abstract
    Exit
  • Journal Article Low Y, Uehara T, Minowa Y, Yamada H, Ohno Y, Urushidani T, Sedykh A, Muratov E, Kuz’min V, Fourches D, Zhu H, Rusyn I, Tropsha A. Predicting drug-induced hepatotoxicity using QSAR and toxicogenomics approaches. Chemical Research in Toxicology 2011;24(8):1251-1262. R834999 (Final)
    R833825 (Final)
  • Full-text from PubMed
  • Abstract from PubMed
  • Associated PubMed link
  • Full-text: ResearchGate-Abstract & Full Text
    Exit
  • Abstract: ACS Publications-Abstract
    Exit
  • Other: ACS-Full Text PDF
    Exit
  • Journal Article Low Y, Sedykh A, Fourches D, Golbraikh A, Whelan M, Rusyn I, Tropsha A. Integrative chemical-biological read-across approach for chemical hazard classification. Chemical Research in Toxicology 2013;26(8):1199-1208. R834999 (Final)
    R835166 (2013)
    R835166 (2016)
    R835166 (Final)
  • Full-text from PubMed
  • Abstract from PubMed
  • Associated PubMed link
  • Full-text: ACS-Full Text HTML
    Exit
  • Abstract: ACS-Abstract
    Exit
  • Other: ACS-Full Text PDF
    Exit
  • Journal Article Low YS, Caster O, Bergvall T, Fourches D, Zang X, Norén GN, Rusyn I, Edwards R, Tropsha A. Cheminformatics-aided pharmacovigilance:application to Stevens-Johnson Syndrome. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2016;23(5):968-978. R834999 (Final)
  • Full-text: Full Text HTML
  • Progress and Final Reports:

    Original Abstract
  • 2011
  • 2012
  • 2013
  • Top of Page

    The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

    Project Research Results

    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
    • Original Abstract
    4 publications for this project
    4 journal articles for this project

    Site Navigation

    • Grantee Research Project Results Home
    • Grantee Research Project Results Basic Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Advanced Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Fielded Search
    • Publication search
    • EPA Regional Search

    Related Information

    • Search Help
    • About our data collection
    • Research Grants
    • P3: Student Design Competition
    • Research Fellowships
    • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)
    Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
    Last updated April 28, 2023
    United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Discover.

    • Accessibility
    • Budget & Performance
    • Contracting
    • EPA www Web Snapshot
    • Grants
    • No FEAR Act Data
    • Plain Writing
    • Privacy
    • Privacy and Security Notice

    Connect.

    • Data.gov
    • Inspector General
    • Jobs
    • Newsroom
    • Open Government
    • Regulations.gov
    • Subscribe
    • USA.gov
    • White House

    Ask.

    • Contact EPA
    • EPA Disclaimers
    • Hotlines
    • FOIA Requests
    • Frequent Questions

    Follow.