Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you have safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Contact Us

Grantee Research Project Results

2014 Progress Report: Water Infrastructure Sustainability and Health in Alabama’s Black Belt

EPA Grant Number: R834866
Title: Water Infrastructure Sustainability and Health in Alabama’s Black Belt
Investigators: Johnson, Pauline , Stauber, Christine , Brown, Joe , Olson, Julie
Institution: The University of Alabama at Birmingham , Georgia State University
EPA Project Officer: Packard, Benjamin H
Project Period: August 1, 2011 through September 30, 2015 (Extended to September 30, 2016)
Project Period Covered by this Report: August 1, 2013 through July 31,2014
Project Amount: $598,739
RFA: Advancing Public Health Protection through Water Infrastructure Sustainability (2009) RFA Text |  Recipients Lists
Research Category: Drinking Water , Water

Objective:

Objectives of this study are to: (1) assess public health impacts associated with rural water supply system performance and water quality across a range of small public and private utilities in rural Alabama; (2) conduct a quantitative microbial risk assessment using measured water quality exposure data; (3) identify possible transmission pathways for waterborne pathogens in rural water supply systems; and (4) identify low-cost, practicable risk mitigation strategies to protect public health.

Progress Summary:

This project includes active surveillance of water quality across 14 different systems in a three-county area over a total period of 3 years. During this reporting period, we have concluded system-level, large-volume field sampling (household-level water quality and survey data collection; refined methods for pathogen sampling, storage, and processing; and have completed system-level sampling using dead-end ultrafiltration for indicator and molecular work). We also have concluded our planned work with water system operators.

Twelve water supplies were sampled in participating counties (two water supplies declined to participate in system-level sampling). Water samples were collected from 10 locations within each system on three sample collection rounds. All initial time point samples were collected September 2013 to January 2014, with the second and third collections taking place January 2014 to March 2014 and March 2014 to May 2014, respectively. Each water sample was assigned to one of the six possible location categories and analyzed initially for several physical-chemical parameters and microbial indicators (Figure 1). Each system had a slightly different combination of sampling locations due to variability between system infrastructure components and willingness of operators to cooperate and abide by the predetermined parameters. Sample collection locations included 26 wellhead pump stations, 1 surface water extraction point, 21 fire hydrants, 1 clean out (i.e., designated entry points into the water service used for maintenance and sampling), 7 water tower outlets, and 64 outside faucets at public buildings and private homes. Our goal was include a diversity of sample locations that then will inform the quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) analysis as the primary objective of this study.

Figure 1. Sample processing of dead-end ultrafiltration samples and completed analysis to date.

 

We have obtained approval for our QAPP; obtained IRB approval from the University of Alabama and Georgia State University; created a field laboratory for the processing of samples and as the operational base for field data collection; trained data collection assistants; refined methods and established a library for the proposed microbial source tracking of Escherichia coli (E. coli) isolates; established communication and coordination with partners, including operators, water boards, the Alabama Department of Public Health, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and local nonprofit organizations; and obtained maps and system information from operators. We have produced two publications and one dissertation, and have two more manuscripts in draft form. We have conducted a 1-day workshop with operators and managers from local water supplies on Water Safety Plans and microbial risks in drinking waters as part of our commitment to work with systems who have an interest in managing microbial risks.

At the conclusion of year 3, we have ended field sampling, having completed household sampling in 897 households, and collected 360 large-volume, dead-end ultrafiltration samples for microbial quality characterization in supplies. After an in-depth review of the data, and after seeking guidance from EPA, we have decided to scale up our pathogen analyses to include semiquantitative measures of 15 waterborne pathogens via a novel multiplex method. 
 
Initial Results. In the preliminary analysis, households that reported water service conditions such as intermittent service, low water pressure, poor taste, odor and odd color were examined to determine if there were associations with reported health symptoms via chi-square analysis. Households that reported poor service conditions such as experiencing intermittent service also were more likely to report any gastrointestinal symptoms, as well as individual symptoms such as diarrhea or vomiting. Similar associations were found for households that reported low water pressure, poor taste and odor, as well as water with an odd color. In addition to reported water service conditions, we examined associations between bacterial contamination and health symptoms, as well as sanitation conditions and health symptoms, but found no significant associations. System-level water quality data indicate that temporal heterogeneity may dominate variability in microbial indicators (over spatial), suggesting benefits of longitudinal monitoring in small systems to understand risks to consumers. Pathogen analysis (now ongoing) will result in values for a range of pathogens to be used in QMRA, a primary goal of this study. The QMRA will be used together with hydraulic flow models to understand the magnitude and distribution of risk across small supplies.

Year 3 Summary Results 

Temporal and spatial trends for key water quality measures were evaluated in12 rural drinking water systems via large-volume water sampling from 10 locations within each system on three sampling dates. Tests for normality on all continuous water quality measures were performed using histograms and normal probability plots. Values for turbidity and HPC were log transformed to make patterns in these highly skewed, non-normally distributed data more interpretable. To compare the continuous variables of measured water quality (free chlorine, total chlorine, pH, turbidity, pressure and HPC) across location groups and time points, Kruskal-Wallis tests were used and box plots were generated to visualize trends. Four water quality variables (total coliforms, E. coli, enterococci, F+ RNA coliphage) are reported below as principal microbial indicators.

Table 1. Associations between binary water quality measures and location within each time point. P values reported are from Pearson’s Chi2 tests. Percent positive = percentage of 100 mL samples that were positive; mg/L = milligrams/liter; N = sample size; bold = statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05).

Future Activities:

Work in Y4 will focus on molecular analysis of these 360 system-level samples for 15 pathogens by multiple methods and using these data in integrated, stochastic risk assessment models.

Future activities include pathogen analysis of all sample concentrates. QMRA models will be constructed to make use of microbial data. 

Planned activities in Y4:

References:

[1] Claas EC, Burnham CA, Mazzulli T, Templeton K, Topin F. Performance of the xTAG® gastrointestinal pathogen panel, a multiplex molecular assay for simultaneous detection of bacterial, viral, and parasitic causes of infectious gastroenteritis. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2013;23(7):1041-1045.


Journal Articles on this Report : 2 Displayed | Download in RIS Format

Publications Views
Other project views: All 12 publications 3 publications in selected types All 3 journal articles
Publications
Type Citation Project Document Sources
Journal Article Wedgworth JC, Brown J, Johnson P, Olson JB, Elliott M, Forehand R, Stauber CE. Associations between perceptions of drinking water service delivery and measured drinking water quality in rural Alabama. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2014;11(7):7376-7392. R834866 (2014)
R834866 (2015)
R834866 (2016)
R834866 (Final)
  • Full-text from PubMed
  • Abstract from PubMed
  • Associated PubMed link
  • Full-text: MDPI-Full Text-HTML
    Exit
  • Abstract: MDPI-Abstract
    Exit
  • Other: MDPI-Full Text-PDF
    Exit
  • Journal Article Wedgworth JC, Brown J, Olson JB, Johnson P, Elliott M, Grammer P, Stauber CE. Temporal heterogeneity of water quality in rural Alabama water supplies. Journal of the American Water Works Association 2015;107(8):E401-E415. R834866 (2014)
    R834866 (2015)
    R834866 (2016)
    R834866 (Final)
  • Full-text: Georgia State University-Full text-PDF
    Exit
  • Abstract: AWWA-Abstract
    Exit
  • Other: AWWA-Full Text-PDF
    Exit
  • Supplemental Keywords:

    Drinking water, health effects, sensitive populations, risk assessment, water quality, water infrastructure

    Progress and Final Reports:

    Original Abstract
  • 2012 Progress Report
  • 2013 Progress Report
  • 2015 Progress Report
  • 2016 Progress Report
  • Final Report
  • Top of Page

    The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

    Project Research Results

    • Final Report
    • 2016 Progress Report
    • 2015 Progress Report
    • 2013 Progress Report
    • 2012 Progress Report
    • Original Abstract
    12 publications for this project
    3 journal articles for this project

    Site Navigation

    • Grantee Research Project Results Home
    • Grantee Research Project Results Basic Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Advanced Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Fielded Search
    • Publication search
    • EPA Regional Search

    Related Information

    • Search Help
    • About our data collection
    • Research Grants
    • P3: Student Design Competition
    • Research Fellowships
    • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)
    Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
    Last updated April 28, 2023
    United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Discover.

    • Accessibility
    • Budget & Performance
    • Contracting
    • EPA www Web Snapshot
    • Grants
    • No FEAR Act Data
    • Plain Writing
    • Privacy
    • Privacy and Security Notice

    Connect.

    • Data.gov
    • Inspector General
    • Jobs
    • Newsroom
    • Open Government
    • Regulations.gov
    • Subscribe
    • USA.gov
    • White House

    Ask.

    • Contact EPA
    • EPA Disclaimers
    • Hotlines
    • FOIA Requests
    • Frequent Questions

    Follow.