Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you have safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Contact Us

Grantee Research Project Results

Through-Tool Drilling with Supercritical CO2 Metal Working Fluids

EPA Contract Number: EPD10027
Title: Through-Tool Drilling with Supercritical CO2 Metal Working Fluids
Investigators: King, Andrew
Current Investigators: Jones, Scott O
Small Business: Fusion Coolant Systems, Inc.
EPA Contact: Richards, April
Phase: I
Project Period: March 1, 2010 through August 31, 2010
Project Amount: $70,000
RFA: Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) - Phase I (2010) RFA Text |  Recipients Lists
Research Category: SBIR - Pollution Prevention , Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)

Description:

Metal working fluids (MWFs) are designed to cool and lubricate manufacturing operations. This $1 billion industry has not changed much in decades and today has a number of problems, including an inability to meet new machining challenges (e.g., titanium machining in aerospace applications), Employee Health and Safety (EH&S) concerns, toxic waste disposal, and cost. Today’s MWFs represent a significant environmental issue, with millions of gallons of contaminated material being produced per year in the United States alone.

Fusion Coolant Systems, Inc. is commercializing a radically different system to replace conventional MWFs. Proposed is a new class of MWFs that is based on a high pressure solution of lubricants dissolved in supercritical carbon dioxide. These new MWFs, called CHiP Lubes (Cryogenic High Pressure Lubricants), have been shown to provide better cooling and higher lubricity than existing MWFs in several metalworking applications. Additionally, these MWFs have a much lower environmental footprint and lower overall system costs than current MWFs, and also eliminate health risks to workers arising from chemicals and microorganisms in today’s MWFs. They can be applied successfully in manufacturing where so-called “minimum quantity lubricants” cannot be applied and have a lower environmental footprint. The project already has attracted considerable commercial interest from industry partners. Numerous research obstacles must first be addressed, however, to allow the application of CHiP Lubes to a wider set of operations.

The objective of this SBIR project is to develop the CHiP Lube system for deep-hole drilling. Whereas CHiP Lubes have been successfully demonstrated in simple, single-point turning applications, there is little understanding of how these innovative MWFs will perform in deep-hole drilling applications. A “through-tool” delivery of CHiP Lubes is necessary for this and has not yet been accomplished. The research is high-risk as CHiP Lubes will not have the same chip clearing efficiency as today’s MWFs (at a given pressure) because they are delivered in a carrier gas that is compressible, whereas liquid MWFs are not compressible. This will create challenges of delivering the fluid economically and there is some chance, even at supercritical pressures, that the system will not work. If the CHiP Lubes can be made to work through the research proposed in Phase I, however, it will be possible to remove a significant toxic waste stream from the environment, improve worker health and safety, and increase the profitability and competitiveness of the American manufacturing sector.

Supplemental Keywords:

small business, SBIR, EPA, manufacturing, metal working fluids, toxic waste disposal, contaminants, health risks, metalworking applications, deep-hole drilling, toxic waste, human health, worker safety, through-tool drilling, supercritical CO2 drilling fluids,

Progress and Final Reports:

  • Final Report
  • Top of Page

    The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

    Project Research Results

    • Final Report

    Site Navigation

    • Grantee Research Project Results Home
    • Grantee Research Project Results Basic Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Advanced Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Fielded Search
    • Publication search
    • EPA Regional Search

    Related Information

    • Search Help
    • About our data collection
    • Research Grants
    • P3: Student Design Competition
    • Research Fellowships
    • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)
    Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
    Last updated April 28, 2023
    United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Discover.

    • Accessibility
    • Budget & Performance
    • Contracting
    • EPA www Web Snapshot
    • Grants
    • No FEAR Act Data
    • Plain Writing
    • Privacy
    • Privacy and Security Notice

    Connect.

    • Data.gov
    • Inspector General
    • Jobs
    • Newsroom
    • Open Government
    • Regulations.gov
    • Subscribe
    • USA.gov
    • White House

    Ask.

    • Contact EPA
    • EPA Disclaimers
    • Hotlines
    • FOIA Requests
    • Frequent Questions

    Follow.