Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you have safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Contact Us

Grantee Research Project Results

Spatial Demographic Models for the Study of Stress Effects on Wildlife Populations

EPA Grant Number: R829089
Title: Spatial Demographic Models for the Study of Stress Effects on Wildlife Populations
Investigators: Caswell, Hal , Neubert, Michael
Institution: Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
EPA Project Officer: Packard, Benjamin H
Project Period: December 17, 2001 through December 16, 2005 (Extended to June 16, 2006)
Project Amount: $500,000
RFA: Wildlife Risk Assessment (2001) RFA Text |  Recipients Lists
Research Category: Aquatic Ecosystems , Biology/Life Sciences , Ecological Indicators/Assessment/Restoration

Description:

We propose to develop new approaches to assessing risks to wildlife populations, particularly risks characterized by a multiple stressors and by spatial distribution. Our approach will weave together two threads already spun into the fabric of demographic analysis: models for spatially distributed populations and analyses of the effects of stressors. The methods we propose to develop will be capable of assimilating a variety of kinds of demographic and dispersal data. They will also permit quantification of the uncertainty in the conclusions that derives from incomplete or uncertain data.

Approach:

Stressors affect the vital rates (survival, reproduction, growth, development) of individual organisms, and the effects are often stage specific. That is, stress effects may be more pronounced in old individuals than in young individuals, or in smaller than in larger individuals, etc.). Measuring the population consequences of a stressor therefore requires a demographic model to integrate these diverse effects and to calculate from them indices of population performance. Matrix population models are uniquely suited to this purpose; they will form the foundation of our modeling approach.

Because individuals move, and because the effects of a stressor depend on its spatial distribution, our models will include spatial structure. We will use two approaches to the modeling space: the metapopulation paradigm and the continuous landscape paradigm. Each approach lends itself to the analysis of a particular set of stressors and endpoints.

Expected Results:

The use of matrix models in wildlife risk assessment has already proven valuable to ecologists and resource managers. The methods that we will develop build upon matrix models by adding a spatial dimension. As such, they will greatly extend the situations in which population analysis can address stress effects.

Publications and Presentations:

Publications have been submitted on this project: View all 80 publications for this project

Journal Articles:

Journal Articles have been submitted on this project: View all 20 journal articles for this project

Supplemental Keywords:

conservation, ecology, ecological effects, habitat, mathematics, modeling, population, risk assessment., RFA, Ecosystem Protection/Environmental Exposure & Risk, Scientific Discipline, Economic, Social, & Behavioral Science Research Program, Environmental Statistics, Mathematics, Ecological Risk Assessment, Ecosystem/Assessment/Indicators, exploratory research environmental biology, wildlife, Monitoring/Modeling, Ecological Effects - Environmental Exposure & Risk, Environmental Monitoring, multiple stressors, Wildlife Risk Assessment, stressors, stress effects on wildlife populations, risk assessment, demographic data, sensitive population, wildlife populations, population, spatial demographic model, spatial distribution, ecological exposure, contaminants, predicting risk

Progress and Final Reports:

  • 2002 Progress Report
  • 2003 Progress Report
  • 2004
  • 2005 Progress Report
  • Final Report
  • Top of Page

    The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

    Project Research Results

    • Final Report
    • 2005 Progress Report
    • 2004
    • 2003 Progress Report
    • 2002 Progress Report
    80 publications for this project
    20 journal articles for this project

    Site Navigation

    • Grantee Research Project Results Home
    • Grantee Research Project Results Basic Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Advanced Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Fielded Search
    • Publication search
    • EPA Regional Search

    Related Information

    • Search Help
    • About our data collection
    • Research Grants
    • P3: Student Design Competition
    • Research Fellowships
    • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)
    Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
    Last updated April 28, 2023
    United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Discover.

    • Accessibility
    • Budget & Performance
    • Contracting
    • EPA www Web Snapshot
    • Grants
    • No FEAR Act Data
    • Plain Writing
    • Privacy
    • Privacy and Security Notice

    Connect.

    • Data.gov
    • Inspector General
    • Jobs
    • Newsroom
    • Open Government
    • Regulations.gov
    • Subscribe
    • USA.gov
    • White House

    Ask.

    • Contact EPA
    • EPA Disclaimers
    • Hotlines
    • FOIA Requests
    • Frequent Questions

    Follow.