You are here:
VIRUS TRANSPORT IN PHYSICALLY AND GEOCHEMICALLY HETEROGENEOUS SUBSURFACE POROUS MEDIA. (R826179)
Citation:
Bhattacharjee, S., J. N. Ryan, AND M. Elimelech. VIRUS TRANSPORT IN PHYSICALLY AND GEOCHEMICALLY HETEROGENEOUS SUBSURFACE POROUS MEDIA. (R826179). JOURNAL OF CONTAMINANT HYDROLOGY. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 57(3-4):161-187, (2002).
Description:
A two-dimensional model for virus transport in physically and geochemically heterogeneous subsurface porous media is presented. The model involves solution of the advection–dispersion equation, which additionally considers virus inactivation in the solution, as well as virus removal at the solid matrix surface due to attachment (deposition), release, and inactivation. Two surface inactivation models for the fate of attached inactive viruses and their subsequent role on virus attachment and release were considered. Geochemical heterogeneity, portrayed as patches of positively charged metal oxyhydroxide coatings on collector grain surfaces, and physical heterogeneity, portrayed as spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity, were incorporated in the model. Both layered and randomly (log-normally) distributed physical and geochemical heterogeneities were considered. The upstream weighted multiple cell balance method was employed to numerically solve the governing equations of groundwater flow and virus transport. Model predictions show that the presence of subsurface layered geochemical and physical heterogeneity results in preferential flow paths and thus significantly affect virus mobility. Random distributions of physical and geochemical heterogeneity have also notable influence on the virus transport behavior. While the solution inactivation rate was found to significantly influence the virus transport behavior, surface inactivation under realistic field conditions has probably a negligible influence on the overall virus transport. It was further demonstrated that large virus release rates result in extended periods of virus breakthrough over significant distances downstream from the injection sites. This behavior suggests that simpler models that account for virus adsorption through a retardation factor may yield a misleading assessment of virus transport in "hydrogeologically sensitive" subsurface environments.
Author Keywords: Virus transport; Modeling virus transport; Virus inactivation; Surface inactivation; Geochemical heterogeneity; Physical heterogeneity; Groundwater