Science Inventory

Assessment of health risks resulting from early-life exposures: Are current chemical toxicity testing protocols and risk assessment methods adequate?

Citation:

Felter, S., G. Daston, S. Euling, A. Piersma, AND M. Tassinari. Assessment of health risks resulting from early-life exposures: Are current chemical toxicity testing protocols and risk assessment methods adequate? CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY. Taylor & Francis Group, London, Uk, 45(3):219-244, (2015). https://doi.org/10.3109/10408444.2014.993919

Impact/Purpose:

This review article synthesizes the current state of the risk assessment practices, the state of the science and a subset of chemical and pharmaceutical examples pertaining to risk assessment for children 0-6 years of age.

Description:

Over the last couple of decades, the awareness of the potential health impacts associated with early-life exposures has increased. Global regulatory approaches to chemical risk assessment are intended to be protective for the diverse human population including all life stages. However, questions persist as to whether the current testing approaches and risk assessment methodologies are adequately protective for infants and children. Here, we review physiological and developmental differences that may result in differential sensitivity associated with early-life exposures. It is clear that sensitivity to chemical exposures during early-life can be similar, higher, or lower than that of adults, and can change quickly within a short developmental timeframe. Moreover, age-related exposure differences provide an important consideration for overall susceptibility. Differential sensitivity associated with a life stage can reflect the toxicokinetic handling of a xenobiotic exposure, the toxicodynamic response, or both. Each of these is illustrated with chemical-specific examples. The adequacy of current testing protocols, proposed new tools, and risk assessment methods for systemic noncancer endpoints are reviewed in light of the potential for differential risk to infants and young children.

Record Details:

Record Type:DOCUMENT( JOURNAL/ PEER REVIEWED JOURNAL)
Product Published Date:02/11/2015
Record Last Revised:08/21/2023
OMB Category:Other
Record ID: 358602