You are here:
An environmental assessment (and database) of stream confluences for the conterminous U.S.
Citation:
Wickham, J. An environmental assessment (and database) of stream confluences for the conterminous U.S. Center for Watershed Protection - 2020 National Conference- Webinar, Austin, Texas, November 18, 2020.
Impact/Purpose:
Stream confluences are important components of fluvial networks. The reshaping of streambed morphology and sediment by hydraulic forces meeting at stream confluences increases habitat heterogeneity, which has led some to propose that stream confluences may be biological hotspots. We developed a national database of stream confluences that includes more than 380 attributes and also classify stream confluences using geospatial indicators of ecological condition. The database should be useful to a wide variety of watershed planners and stakeholders that are interested in improving and maintaining the ecological integrity of their surrounding streams and watersheds.
Description:
Stream confluences are important components of fluvial networks. Hydraulic forces meeting at stream confluences often produce changes in streambed morphology and sediment distribution, and these changes often increase habitat heterogeneity relative to upstream and downstream locations. Increases in habitat heterogeneity at stream confluences have led some to identify them as biological hotspots. Despite their potential ecological importance, there are relatively few empirical studies documenting ecological patterns across the upstream-confluence-downstream gradient. To facilitate more studies of the ecological value and role of stream confluences in fluvial networks, we have produced a database of stream confluences and their associated watershed attributes for the conterminous United States. The database includes 1,085,629 stream confluences. There are 383 attributes for each confluence that are organized into 15 database tables for both tributary and mainstem upstream catchments (“local” watersheds) and watersheds. Themes represented by the database tables include hydrology (e.g., stream order), land cover and land cover change, geology (e.g., calcium content of underlying lithosphere), physical condition (e.g., precipitation), measures of ecological integrity, and stressors (e.g., impaired streams). Additionally, we used the measures of ecological integrity to assess the condition of the stream confluences. Aside from a generally positive east-to-west gradient in ecological condition, we found that approximately one-third of the confluences have markedly contrasting ecological conditions between mainstem and tributary, catchment and watershed, or both.