You are here:
Influence of high-resolution data on the assessment of forest fragmentation
Citation:
Wickham, J. AND K. Ritters. Influence of high-resolution data on the assessment of forest fragmentation. LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY. Springer, New York, NY, 34:2169–2182, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00820-z
Impact/Purpose:
High resolution data are likely to become more commonplace in the near future, creating the potential for re-assessment of many ecosystems and ecosystem services. Spatial analysis of forest fragmentation patterns from high-resolution data will be an important contribution to the EnviroAtlas
Description:
Context Remote sensing has been a foundation of landscape ecology. The spatial resolution (pixel size) of remotely sensed land cover products has improved since the introduction of landscape ecology in the United States. Because patterns depend on spatial resolution, emerging improvements in the spatial resolution of land cover may lead to new insights about the scaling of landscape patterns. Objective We compared forest fragmentation measures derived from very high resolution (1 m2) data with the same measures derived from the commonly used (30 m-x-30 m; 900 m2) Landsat-based data. Methods We applied area-density scaling to binary (forest; non-forest) maps for both sources to derive source-specific estimates of dominant (density ≥ 60%), interior (≥ 90%), and intact (100%) forest. Results Switching from low- to high-resolution data produced statistical and geographic shifts in forest spatial patterns. Forest and non-forest features that were “invisible” at low resolution but identifiable at high resolution resulted in higher estimates of dominant and interior forest but lower estimates of intact forest from the high-resolution source. Overall, the high-resolution data detected more forest that was more contagiously distributed even at larger spatial scales. Conclusion We anticipate that improved spatial resolution of remotely sensed land cover products will advance landscape ecology through re-interpretations of patterns and scaling, by fostering new landscape pattern measurements, and by testing new spatial pattern-ecological process hypotheses.
