Science Inventory

US EPA’s Research on PFAS - Narragansett, RI

Citation:

Speth, T. US EPA’s Research on PFAS - Narragansett, RI. Region 2 State Environmental and Health Leadership Meeting, Narragansett, RI, August 13 - 14, 2019.

Impact/Purpose:

This talk will present EPA's research of PFAS analytics and treatment of biosolids, ambient water, and finished drinking waters. Drinking Water Treatment Problem: Utilities lack treatment technology cost data for PFAS removal Action: Gather performance and cost data from available sources (DOD, utilities, industry, etc.) Conduct EPA research on performance of treatment technologies including home treatment systems Update EPA’s Treatability Database and Unit Cost Models Connect EPA’s Treatability Database to EPA’s Unit Cost Models for ease of operation Model performance and cost, and then extrapolate to other scenarios Variable source waters Variable PFAS concentrations in source water Different reactivation/disposal options Document secondary benefits Address treatment impact on corrosion Evaluate reactivation of granular activated carbon (GAC) Impact: Enable utilities to make informed decisions about cost-effective treatment strategies for removing PFAS from drinking water. Future Work: Activated Carbon Reactivation Problem: There is a liability concern regarding the reactivation of spent granular activated carbon (GAC) What percentage of the adsorbed PFAS are released from the carbon and how much remains after reactivation? What conditions are optimal for reactivation (temperature, time, reactor configuration)? What impact does reactivation have on the performance of off-gas incineration treatment? Are PFAS released after reactivation with incineration off-gas treatment? Action: Conduct bench- and full-scale research on reactivation processes Impact of time and temperature PFAS reactions during reactivation Impact of post incineration

Description:

This talk will present EPA's research of PFAS analytics and treatment of biosolids, ambient water, and finished drinking waters. Drinking Water Treatment Problem: Utilities lack treatment technology cost data for PFAS removal Action: Gather performance and cost data from available sources (DOD, utilities, industry, etc.) Conduct EPA research on performance of treatment technologies including home treatment systems Update EPA’s Treatability Database and Unit Cost Models Connect EPA’s Treatability Database to EPA’s Unit Cost Models for ease of operation Model performance and cost, and then extrapolate to other scenarios Variable source waters Variable PFAS concentrations in source water Different reactivation/disposal options Document secondary benefits Address treatment impact on corrosion Evaluate reactivation of granular activated carbon (GAC) Impact: Enable utilities to make informed decisions about cost-effective treatment strategies for removing PFAS from drinking water. Future Work: Activated Carbon Reactivation Problem: There is a liability concern regarding the reactivation of spent granular activated carbon (GAC) What percentage of the adsorbed PFAS are released from the carbon and how much remains after reactivation? What conditions are optimal for reactivation (temperature, time, reactor configuration)? What impact does reactivation have on the performance of off-gas incineration treatment? Are PFAS released after reactivation with incineration off-gas treatment? Action: Conduct bench- and full-scale research on reactivation processes Impact of time and temperature PFAS reactions during reactivation Impact of post incineration

URLs/Downloads:

SPETH_PFAS 2019-07-29.PDF  (PDF, NA pp,  5941.069  KB,  about PDF)

Record Details:

Record Type:DOCUMENT( PRESENTATION/ SLIDE)
Product Published Date:08/14/2019
Record Last Revised:08/22/2019
OMB Category:Other
Record ID: 346179