Science Inventory

Human exposure factors as potential determinants of the heterogeneity in city-specific associations between PM2.5 and mortality

Citation:

Baxter, L., K. Dionisio, P. Pradeep, K. Rappazzo, AND L. Neas. Human exposure factors as potential determinants of the heterogeneity in city-specific associations between PM2.5 and mortality. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology . Nature Publishing Group, London, Uk, 29(4):557-567, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-018-0080-7

Impact/Purpose:

This study examined the role of exposure differences in the heterogeneity of PM2.5 mortality effect estimates across the U.S., finding that factors related to infiltration and home heating fuel were significant effect modifiers to the PM2.5-mortality relationship. Areas with housing characteristics linked to increased infiltration rates or where fuel use is of a particular kind may be exposed to higher levels of outdoor pollutants and therefore be more vulnerable. National standards may not protect everyone equally, with some populations affected more than others. Determining potential factors that can cause increases in adverse PM2.5 -health effects may help identify at-risk populations and develop actions that can reduce risk.

Description:

Multi-city population-based epidemiological studies of short-term fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposures and mortality have observed heterogeneity in risk estimates between cities. Factors affecting exposures, such as pollutant infiltration, which are not captured by central-site monitoring data, can differ between communities potentially explaining some of this heterogeneity. This analysis evaluates exposure factors as potential determinants of the heterogeneity in 312 core-based statistical areas (CBSA)-specific associations between PM2.5 and mortality using inverse variance weighted linear regression. Exposure factor variables were created based on data on housing characteristics, commuting patterns, heating fuel usage, and climatic factors from national surveys. When survey data were not available, air conditioning (AC) prevalence was predicted utilizing machine learning techniques. Across all CBSAs, there was a 0.95% (Interquartile range (IQR) of 2.25) increase in non-accidental mortality per 10 µg/m3 increase in PM2.5 and significant heterogeneity between CBSAs. CBSAs with larger homes, more heating degree days, a higher percentage of home heating with oil had significantly (p < 0.05) higher health effect estimates, while cities with more gas heating had significantly lower health effect estimates. While univariate models did not explain much of heterogeneity in health effect estimates (R2 < 1%), multivariate models began to explain some of the observed heterogeneity (R2 = 13%).

Record Details:

Record Type:DOCUMENT( JOURNAL/ PEER REVIEWED JOURNAL)
Product Published Date:06/01/2019
Record Last Revised:07/05/2019
OMB Category:Other
Record ID: 345671