Identification of Hotspots of Genetic Risk for Type 2 Diabetes Using GIS Methods
Citation:
Druwe, I. AND Allen Davis. Identification of Hotspots of Genetic Risk for Type 2 Diabetes Using GIS Methods. GEMS Annual mtg, Durham, NC, November 07, 2017.
Impact/Purpose:
to deliver a technical oral presentation on the development of an approach for community-level risk screening focused on identifying potential genetic susceptibility hotpots published by Davis et al in 2015.
Description:
BACKGROUND: Having the ability to scan the entire country for potential "hotspots" with increased risk of developing chronic diseases due to various environmental, demographic, and genetic susceptibility factors may inform risk management decisions and enable better environmental public health policies. OBJECTIVES: Develop an approach for community-level risk screening focused on identifying potential genetic susceptibility hotpots. METHODS: Our approach combines analyses of phenotype-genotype data, genetic prevalence of single nucleotide polymorphisms, and census/geographic information to estimate census tract-level population attributable risks among various ethnicities and total population for the state of California. RESULTS: We estimate that the rs13266634 single nucleotide polymorphism, a type 2 diabetes susceptibility genotype, has a genetic prevalence of 56.3%, 47.4% and 37.0% in Mexican Mestizo, Caucasian, and Asian populations. Looking at the top quintile for total population attributable risk, 16 California counties have greater than 25% of their population living in hotspots of genetic susceptibility for developing type 2 diabetes due to this single genotypic susceptibility factor. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified counties in California where large portions of the population may bear additional type 2 diabetes risk due to increased genetic prevalence of a susceptibility genotype. This type of screening can easily be extended to include information on environmental contaminants of interest and other related diseases, and potentially enables the rapid identification of potential environmental justice communities. Other potential uses of this approach include problem formulation in support of risk assessments, land use planning, and prioritization of site cleanup and remediation actions.