Science Inventory

Modification of an Existing In vitro Method to Predict Relative Bioavailable Arsenic in Soils

Citation:

Whitacre, S., N. Basta, B. Stevens, V. Hanley, R. Anderson, AND K. Scheckel. Modification of an Existing In vitro Method to Predict Relative Bioavailable Arsenic in Soils. CHEMOSPHERE. Elsevier Science Ltd, New York, NY, 180:545-552, (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.03.134

Impact/Purpose:

Exposure risk associated with soils contaminated with arsenic (As) is assessed by human health risk assessment (HHRA). A critical component of HHRA is exposure assessment by various exposure pathways. In soils, often the most important pathway for As, the risk driver, associated with human exposure is incidental soil ingestion. However, use of total soil As often overestimates exposure because physiochemical properties of the soil matrix can sequester As and reduces its transmission through exposure pathways. The objectives of the current study were to (i) evaluate the ability of the OSU-IVG method to predict RBA As for As contaminated soils with a wider range of As content and As contaminant sources, and (ii) evaluate a modified extraction procedure's ability to improve prediction of RBA As. This information is of interest to Regional and Program Office decision makers, States, and local affected communities.

Description:

The soil matrix can sequester arsenic (As) and reduces its exposure by soil ingestion. In vivo dosing studies and in vitro gastrointestinal (IVG) methods have been used to predict relative bioavailable (RBA) As. Originally, the Ohio State University (OSU-IVG) method predicted RBA As for soils exclusively from mining and smelting sites with a median of 5,636 mg As kg-1. The objectives of the current study were to (i) evaluate the ability of the OSU-IVG method to predict RBA As for As contaminated soils with a wider range of As content and As contaminant sources, and (ii) evaluate a modified extraction procedure's ability to improve prediction of RBA As. In vitro bioaccessible (IVBA) by OSU-IVG and California Bioaccessibility Method (CAB) methods, RBA As, speciation, and properties of 33 As contaminated soils were determined. Total As ranged from 162 to 12,483 mg kg-1 with a median of 731 mg kg-1. RBA As ranged from 1.30 to 60.0% and OSU-IVG IVBA As ranged from 0.80 to 52.3%. Arsenic speciation was predominantly As(V) adsorbed to hydrous ferric oxide (HFO) or iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), and aluminum (Al) oxides. The OSU-IVG often extracted significantly less As in vitro than in vivo RBA As, in particularly for soils from historical gold mining. The CAB method, which is a modified OSU-IVG method extracted more As than OSU-IVG for most soils, resulting in a more accurate predictor than OSU-IVG, especially for low to moderately contaminated soils (<1,500 mg As kg-1) with RBA As = 0.81 IVBA As + 3.2, r2 = 0.91.

Record Details:

Record Type:DOCUMENT( JOURNAL/ PEER REVIEWED JOURNAL)
Product Published Date:08/31/2017
Record Last Revised:06/04/2020
OMB Category:Other
Record ID: 336288