Science Inventory

PERSONAL AND AMBIENT EXPOSURES TO AIR TOXICS IN CAMDEN, NEW JERSEY

Impact/Purpose:

Air toxics comprise a large and diverse group of air pollutants that, with sufficient exposure, are known or suspected to cause adverse effects on human health. The Clean Air Act requires the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to characterize, prioritize, and address the effects of air toxics on public health and the environment.

Although ambient concentrations of some of these air toxics have been monitored by state or local agencies in some areas, the characterization of personal exposures to air toxics has been limited. And although ambient concentrations are generally low, so-called hot spots might exist where concentrations of one or more air toxics, and consequent exposures of area populations, could be elevated. In 2003, HEI targeted research to identify and characterize potential air toxics hot spots, with the aim of conducting future health studies in these locations.

Air toxics comprise a large and diverse group of air pollutants that, with sufficient exposure, are known or suspected to cause adverse effects on human health. The Clean Air Act requires the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to characterize, prioritize, and address the effects of air toxics on public health and the environment.

Although ambient concentrations of some of these air toxics have been monitored by state or local agencies in some areas, the characterization of personal exposures to air toxics has been limited. And although ambient concentrations are generally low, so-called hot spots might exist where concentrations of one or more air toxics, and consequent exposures of area populations, could be elevated. In 2003, HEI targeted research to identify and characterize potential air toxics hot spots, with the aim of conducting future health studies in these locations.

Description:

The investigators reported that one of the neighborhoods, Waterfront South, had consistently higher ambient concentrations than the other, Copewood–Davis, of PM2.5, toluene, xylenes, and PAHs. Thus, by the investigators’ original definition of a hot spot (i.e., having elevated concentrations compared with those of a nearby control, or comparison, area with fewer industrial sites), Waterfront South could be considered a hot spot for these pollutants. However, ambient concentrations in Copewood–Davis of several other pollutants — benzene, MTBE, chloroform, carbon tetrachloride, hexane, and acetaldehyde — were as high as or higher than those in Waterfront South. The Committee generally considered the measurements of the air pollutants to have been accurate and reliable. However, they were concerned about the validity of the absolute concentrations of benzene, formaldehyde, and acetaldehyde, because they were much higher than those reported in other studies, and there appeared to be some specific problems with the measurement method for formaldehyde.

In summary, the current study provided valuable information about ambient and personal concentrations of PM2.5 and a large number of air toxics and demonstrated elevated ambient concentrations (compared with other areas in New Jersey and across the United States) of some air toxics in both of these lower-socioeconomic-status neighborhoods. At the same time, the findings illustrate the difficulties of defining an area a priori as a potential hot spot — or as a control location. The design of future exposure and health effects studies in hot spots will need to take multiple pollutant sources and meteorologic factors into consideration to achieve sufficient contrasts in pollutant concentrations between appropriately chosen hot spots and background locations

Record Details:

Record Type:PROJECT( ABSTRACT )
Start Date:04/01/2010
Completion Date:03/31/2015
Record ID: 258329