You are here:
Whistleblowing in Science
Citation:
WEISSBERGER, E. J. Whistleblowing in Science. Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin. American Society of Limnology and Oceanography, Lawrence, KS, 18(2):42-43, (2009).
Impact/Purpose:
The purpose of the article is to inform members of the American Society of Limnology and Oceanography of the ethical issues involved when accusing a colleague of scientific misconduct.
Description:
Before accusing a colleague of scientific misconduct, a person should have clear evidence of wrongdoing, have the knowledge necessary to assess misconduct, and have examined his motivations for alleging misconduct. The accuser may choose to confront the colleague directly, giving him a chance to defend himself. If the accuser fears revenge, he may bring the alleged misconduct to the attention of a supervisor. Accusing someone of misconduct may create uncomfortable working conditions, however, and possibly lead to retaliation. Careful evaluation of the evidence and consideration of the results of public accusation are necessary before alleging wrongdoing.