You are here:
DEFINING APPROPRIATE ROLES FOR SCIENCE AND SCIENTISTS IN DEVELOPING, ANALYZING, AND IMPLEMENTING PUBLIC POLICY - OCTOBER 2006
Citation:
LACKEY, R. T. DEFINING APPROPRIATE ROLES FOR SCIENCE AND SCIENTISTS IN DEVELOPING, ANALYZING, AND IMPLEMENTING PUBLIC POLICY - OCTOBER 2006. Presented at Seminar to be presented at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, October 16, 2006.
Description:
Resolving typical ecological policy issues requires an array of scientific information as part of the input provided to decision-makers. The ability of scientists (and scientific information) to constructively inform policy deliberations diminishes when what is offered as ¿science¿ is inculcated with personal policy preferences. The scientific enterprise is not free of values, nor is it objectively independent. By definition, scientific information is 'normative' when it contains implicit policy preferences and thus, by extension, promotes or at least tends to favor particular policy options. Normative science may corrupt deliberative process for developing sound ecological policy because it can be a tool for policy advocacy that operates under the guise of policy-neutral science. With its implicitly derived value and preference character, normative science provides little substantive help in reconciling the most divisive elements of ecological, natural resource, and environmental policy. My recommendation is for scientists to play the important role of informing (by providing policy-neutral scientific information) ecological policy discussions, but the role should be carefully circumscribed and understood by all involved parties. Scientific information is important, even essential, for developing wise ecological policies, but scientists should be vigilant to letting personal policy preferences infect their scientific input.