Office of Research and Development Publications

Ecosystem Services Deserve Better than “Dirty Paper”

Citation:

Chapman, P., H. Selck, N. Doorn, AND W. Munns. Ecosystem Services Deserve Better than “Dirty Paper”. ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Pensacola, FL, 36(4):867-868, (2017).

Impact/Purpose:

This Letter to the Editor is in response to a Letter submitted to the journal that questions why an earlier paper (Selck et al. 2016; ORD-015297) hadn’t lobbied harder for monetization of ecosystem services to inform decisions. We present our rationale for promoting pluralism in methods to capture peoples values associated with changes in ecosystems services, some of which do not involve monetization.

Description:

This letter presents our rationale for promoting pluralism in methods to capture peoples values associated with changes in ecosystems services, some of which do not involve monetization.

URLs/Downloads:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.3763   Exit

Record Details:

Record Type: DOCUMENT (JOURNAL/PEER REVIEWED JOURNAL)
Product Published Date: 03/28/2017
Record Last Revised: 03/30/2017
OMB Category: Other
Record ID: 335845

Organization:

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

NATIONAL HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS RESEARCH LABORATORY

ATLANTIC ECOLOGY DIVISION