Citation:

Smoot, J., S. Padilla, AND A. Farraj. The utility of alternative models in particulate matter air pollution toxicology. Current Research in Toxicology. Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands, 3:100077, (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crtox.2022.100077

Impact/Purpose:

This review article explores the utility of alternative non-mammalian in vivo models in assessing the toxicity of particulate matter air pollution.  The use of such models may help expedite relative toxicity determinations of various PM sources and may help guide targeted inhalation studies in higher order models.

Description:

Exposure to particulate matter (PM) air pollution is associated with an increased risk of adverse human health effects. As more attention is brought to bear on the problem of PM, traditional in vivo models struggle to keep up with the risk assessment challenges posed by the countless number of unique PM samples across air sheds with limited or no toxicity information. This review examines the utility of three higher throughput, alternative, in vivo animal models in PM toxicity research: Danio rerio (zebrafish), Caenorhabditis elegans (nematode), and Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly). These model organisms vary in basic biology, ease of handling, methods of exposure to PM, number and types of available assays, and the degree to which they mirror human biology and responsiveness, among other differences. The use of these models in PM research dates back over a decade, with assessments of the toxicity of various PM sources including traffic-related combustion emissions, wildland fire smoke, and coal fly ash. This article reviews the use of these alternative model organisms in PM toxicity studies, their biology, the various assays developed, and endpoints measured, their strengths and limitations, as well as their potential role in PM toxicity assessment and mechanistic research going forward.

URLs/Downloads:

Record Details: