You are here:
Evaluating common sensors for ocean acidification research in Tillamook Bay, OR
Citation:
Fairchild, W., T Chris Mochon Collura, B. Rutilla, C. Miller, AND S. Pacella. Evaluating common sensors for ocean acidification research in Tillamook Bay, OR. Hatfield Marine Science Seminar, Newport, OR, June 08, 2023.
Impact/Purpose:
This presentation is the culmination of ~5 years of research conducted in Tillamook Bay, Oregon from 2017-2022. The efforts of this research were to identify baseline ocean acidification metrics, water quality objectives, and organismal stress thresholds. The seminar will highlight the importance of identifying and quantifying measurement uncertainties of three commonly used pH sensors utilized in the estuarine environment for water quality studies. Estuarine managers, ocean acidification groups, and tribal nations interested in achieving high quality measurements of biogeochemical data will be interested and benefit from the goals and objectives outlined in this seminar.
Description:
Current ocean acidification (OA) monitoring within coastal and estuarine environments presents a variety of logistical and technological hurdles. Understanding the intricacies of sensing technology and assessing measurement uncertainty have large implications for the ability of monitoring programs to derive the full suite of marine carbonate system variables with acceptable accuracy. Additionally, there remain unresolved questions surrounding best instrument pairings to meet “weather” and “climate” goals of OA monitoring in coastal settings. In this study, we examined the performance of three commonly used biogeochemical sensors in a dynamic temperate Oregon estuary for coastal acidification monitoring: a YSI-EXO sonde; a Sea-Bird SeapHOx; and a Sunburst SAMI-CO2. We calculated carbonate system uncertainties for all possible pairings of sensor observations and alkalinity derived from an alkalinity-salinity relationship specific to our study area (Alksal = 56.1*Salinity+410, R2=0.98, n=197, SE = 54.5). Monitoring data from the SAMI-CO2 and SeapHOx were capable of meeting aragonite saturation state (Ωa) “weather” goals when paired with Alksal, but no data product was capable of achieving “climate” goals for pHT, partial pressure of CO2 (pCO2), or Ωa. Our analysis demonstrated how data quality objectives for meeting “weather” and ‘climate” goals were less stringent than commonly reported for ocean waters due to the different underlying carbonate chemistry of estuarine waters. Observed pHT from SeaFET and YSI sensors were in better agreement than commonly assumed (0.079 ± 0.073 units), but YSI pHT uncertainties introduced the largest errors in carbonate system calculations. Water quality and organismal threshold exceedance uncertainty was reduced by 78% when using SeaFET pHT as an input when compared with YSI pHT. We suggest that for OA monitoring groups with limited funding, a high-quality pHT or pCO2 sensor paired with a local alkalinity-salinity relationship may be suitable for estuarine OA research.