You are here:
Multiple lines of evidence to decrease drainage to surface area ratio for effective bioinfiltration stormwater control
Citation:
Oconnor, T. Multiple lines of evidence to decrease drainage to surface area ratio for effective bioinfiltration stormwater control . Presented at New Jersey Institute of Technology within the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department Seminar Series, Newark, NJ, March 20, 2023.
Impact/Purpose:
This is a presentation for a Weekly Seminar for NJIT on 03/20/2023. This presentation was previously cleared last year through STICS for an EPA webinar in May ORD-047593 “Multiple lines of evidence to decrease drainage to surface area ratio for effective bioinfiltration stormwater control.” We (Mike Borst and I) met with Michel Boufadel from NJIT at the Edison Environmental Center about future research collaborations. No significant changes were made to the presentation (added a reference of journal article).
Description:
Bioretention units were constructed at USEPA’s Edison Environmental Center to evaluate drainage to surface runoff ratio for sizing of bioretention stormwater controls. Three sizes of hydraulically isolated bioretention units were tested in duplicate with changes in aspect ratio of length from inlet wall by doubling successive length from smallest (3.7 m) to largest (14.9 m) while width remained the same (7.1 m). The watershed areas were nominally the same resulting in watershed to surface area ratios of 5.5:1 for largest duplicate units, 11:1 for the middle units and 22:1 for the smallest. Each unit was instrumented for continuous monitoring with water content reflectometers (WCR) and thermistors with data collected since November 2009. The bioretention units were filled with planting media initially comprised of 90% sand and 10% sphagnum peat moss by volume and approximately 99% and 1%, respectively, by weight. These units were then planted between May and November of 2010 with a variety of native grasses, perennials, shrubs and trees that were tolerant to inundation, drought and salt. In late 2012, a survey of shrubs planted in these bioretention units was performed. The published results of the combined analyses of moisture content, rainfall and size of shrubs indicated the smaller units had superior shrub growth due to the more frequent saturation of the root zone as measured by WCR, while the plants in the largest units, particularly away from front wall where runoff entered, potentially relied on direct rainfall only. Starting in 2017 additional monitoring was performed in these units including chemistry analysis by loss on ignition and total phosphorous of the engineered planting media and an additional survey of plants. As in the previous study, plants did better in the medium (11:1) and small (22:1) bioretention units compared to largest units (5.5:1), and there was greater buildup of organic matter and phosphorous in the smaller units. One species of grass that dominated the two largest bioretention units away from the inlet was drought tolerant which was indicative that plants in these units relied on rainfall rather than stormwater runoff. Oversized units do not completely use the control volume and many of the other original plantings grew slower or were less widespread in comparison to plantings in that smaller units that flooded more frequently and achieved greater growth.