||Case Study Analysis for the Proposed Section 316(b) Phase II Existing Facilities Rule. Part C - E.
||Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Water.
Economic analysis ;
Cooling water ;
Case studies ;
Performance standards ;
Environmental effects ;
Environmental law ;
Clean Water Act ;
Cooling water intake structures ;
||Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy.
||The Ohio River was chosen for a 316(b) case study because it is representative of large industrial rivers in the United States with cumulative impacts resulting from multiple CWIS. The river is a major waterway flowing southwest from Pittsburgh toward the Mississippi River. Throughout its entire length, the river consists of a series of navigation pools controlled by locks and dams maintained by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The locks serve to pass barges from one pool to the next, and the dams regulate pool elevation. In addition to navigation, the Ohio River provides water for industrial and municipal uses, and is an important source of recreation, including pleasure boating, swimming, and fishing.
||See also PB2002-102256.
||Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; and email at email@example.com. NTIS is located at 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA, 22161, USA.
||48G; 43F; 68
||PC A15/MF A03