Full Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 22 OF 60

OLS Field Name OLS Field Data
Main Title Economic impact of implementing two RACT guidelines in the state of Alabama Final report.
CORP Author Booz-Allen and Hamilton, Inc., Florham Park, NJ. Foster D. Snell Div.;Environmental Protection Agency, Atlanta, GA. Region IV.
Publisher U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV, Air and Hazardous Materials Division,
Year Published 1979
Report Number EPA 904/9-79-038; EPA-68-02-2544
Stock Number PB-297 354
OCLC Number 31275446
Subjects Air quality--Economic aspects--Alabama ; Air--Pollution--Economic aspects--Alabama
Additional Subjects Air pollution ; Coatings ; Cans ; Furniture ; Economic impact ; Guidelines ; Industrial wastes ; Benefit cost analysis ; Hydrocarbons ; Manufacturing ; Chlorine organic compounds ; Regulations ; State government ; Methane ; Ethane ; Alabama ; Air pollution abatement ; Reasonably available control technology ; EPA Region 4 ; Ethane/trichloro-trifluoro ; Freon 113 ; Ethane/trichloro
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
EKAM  EPA 904/9-79-038 Region 4 Library/Atlanta,GA 10/14/1994
NTIS  PB-297 354 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. NTIS 01/01/1988
Collation 1 v. (various pagings) ; 28 cm.
Abstract The major objective of the contract effort was to determine the direct economic impact of implementing Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) standards for selected industrial categories in Alabama. The study is to be used primarily to assist EPA and state decisions on achieving the emission limitations of the RACT standards. The economic impact was assessed for the following 2 RACT industrial categories: surface coating of cans and metal furniture. The scope of this project was to determine the costs and direct impact of control to achieve RACT guideline limitations. Direct economic costs and benefits from the implementation of RACT limitations were identified and quantified while secondary impacts (social, energy, employment, etc.) are addressed, they were not a major emphasis in the study.
Notes Prepared by Booz, Allen & Hamilton, Inc. "EPA 904/9-79-038." "May, 1979". "April 1979"--Cover. Includes bibliography.
Place Published Atlanta, Ga. :
Corporate Au Added Ent United States. Environmental Protection Agency. Region IV. Air and Hazardous Materials Division. ; Booz, Allen & Hamilton. ; United States. Environmental Protection Agency. Region IV. Air and Hazardous Materials Division. ; Booz, Allen & Hamilton.
PUB Date Free Form 1979.
Ti Tra Differently Economic impact of implementing RACT guidelines in the State of Alabama.
NTIS Prices PC A06/MF A01
BIB Level m
Cataloging Source OCLC/T
OCLC Time Stamp 19941013094953
Language ENG
Origin OCLC
Type MERGE
OCLC Rec Leader 01071nam 2200265Ka 45010