||Comparison of Bioventing and Air Sparging for In situ Bioremediation of Fuels.
Kampbell, D. H. ;
Griffin, C. J. ;
Blaha, F. A. ;
||Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK. ;Solar Universal Technologies, Inc., Traverse City, MI. ;Coast Guard Civil Engineering Unit, Cleveland, OH.
Microbial degradation ;
Aviation gasoline ;
Biological treatment ;
Water pollution control ;
Land pollution control ;
Ground water ;
Soil contamination ;
Soil venting ;
BTEX(Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylene) ;
||Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy.
||Bioremediation pilot-scale subsurface venting and sparging systems were operated at a low aeration rate at an aviation gasoline spill site. Bioventing removed 99 percent of vadose zone contamination in 8 months with minimal surface emissions. The biosparging process is presently operating and has removed one-third of oily phase residue below the water table in 1 year. The ground water plume has been cleansed of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX) components by sparging.
||Pub. in EPA Symposium on Bioremediation of Hazardous Wastes: Research, Development, and Field Evaluations, Abstracts, EPA/600/R-93/054. See also PB93-221943 and PB92-121342. Prepared in cooperation with Solar Universal Technologies, Inc., Traverse City, MI., and Coast Guard Civil Engineering Unit, Cleveland, OH.
||Reprint: Comparison of Bioventing and Air Sparging for In situ Bioremediation of Fuels.
||68C; 68D; 57K; 97K; 97R
||PC A02/MF A01